Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Todd Handriegh

Todd Handriegh has started 4 posts and replied 25 times.

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Kerry Baird:

@Todd Handriegh, I think you need to write down your strategy and stick to it, because as I see it, your actions are at cross-purposes. 

Do you want to scale?  Then pull out a lot of cash and put your loans on long terms. Let the tenants pay the mortgages down, and don't worry about the interest paid over time.  It is deductible.  Save up an emergency fund.  Save for the next down payment. Rinse and repeat.

Do you want to pay off debt?  I personally would keep the long term mortgages, rather than the forced repayment of a 15 year amortization.  I have used the debt snowball...take all extra rents and accelerate the mortgage pay down on one house at a time, until they are all paid off.

My own strategy was to go "wide" and then go "deep."  What is yours?

 Well said.  Thank you.

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Dan H.:
Originally posted by @Todd Handriegh:

It is one of my rental properties, which is why the rate is higher.  I have 3 rentals, and cashing out could expedite my next purchase...or as stated, just put it in an index fund until the right opportunity comes along.

At the end of the day I just have this nagging feeling that as long as I can make a better return than the rate of interest, it's a win.  Even if it's not as big of a win as I wanted.

If I try and wait until later, rates will get worse, valuations may also get worse, I make $150 less cashflow and lose any potential returns on the investment of that $17k.  I think this is the best lemonade I can make of these lemons.

I think you need a new loan broker. I am closing tomorrow on two 30 year, jumbo cash out investment loans (one is cashing out ~1.75M) at 3.625%. With these 2 loans I have 9 rental loans (and one OO loan).

I do recognize credit score, assets, LTV (the one where I am cashing out $1.75M will be at 70% LTV and is a quad), points/fees, etc. play a role in the rates, but your rate sucks.

Also spending $4K to get $17K implies that you are paying 23.5% for your cash out prior to including the interests.  That is steep price to pay.  I do recognize you are also lowering your payment which increases your cash flow but that comes with a price (basically the loan duration greatly increases the total interest you will pay).

Now lets stay that you put the $17K in the S&P500 and that the S&P out produces your interest rate by 5% (so total of 9.5% which is really close to lifetime S&P500 return), it will take over 4 years to pay off the $4K, but it it worse than that because the $4K is paid up front (you return is in inflation adjusted dollars).

I understand the cash flow and I understand that in the long term you should find it easy to out perform the 4.5% interest.  My issue is that the cost of the money is too high.  $4k to get $17K and significantly higher interest rate (more than should be expected for going from 15 year to 30 year).

Normally I recommend refi over HELOC for long term use or unknown duration use (because HELOC are traditionally variable rate). However, in your case the fees are so high compared to the extract that I recommend at least looking into the HELOC. Recognize that the HELOC variable rate is more likely to go up than stay low or go down (because fed has already announced their intent to raise rates).

Good luck

Thanks Dan I like how you put that.

I did confirm with the lender that Brad suggested that I have been overpaying.  They offered me 3.875%, closing costs near $3k.  That's still a high "ATM withdrawal" fee, I realize.

The cashflow improves a bit more than I thought though...its about +$250/month.

Also, it's hard to quantify the opportunity costs of not cashing out, if it would mean the difference between acquiring another cashflowing rental a year or two sooner than without.  Typically my other rentals cashflow $400-700 per month...if putting that $17k to work could mean an additional year or two of $4800-8400, maybe it's not so bad to spend the $3k to get it.

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Natalie Schanne:

@Ted Hendry - don’t refinance. You paid points. You paid closing costs. Only person getting rich here is your mortgage lender. 3.5% is a great price. Yes you screwed up choosing a 15 year but move on, it’s ok. Work on optimizing your rent and expenses. My rent is up 20% year over year. I would only consider cash out if there was 100k+ trapped equity I couldn’t access at all.

Locally, See if you can set up a line of credit with any local credit union for any tied up equity in your properties up to 75-80% value.

Then work on getting some creative deals done or seeing if you can buy some more properties with 30 year investor financing and cash on hand you have.

If you think that your equity in s&p500 is better, maybe you just want to sell and cash in all your equity.

Also remember appraisers come up with different valuations. I had one appraisal for 310 and another appraisal for 365 on the same property in March 2021 within 1 week, with both given the same sheet of information about what I’m currently renting it for and what recent upgrades I did to it. (Always prepare this sheet so you can guide them to the valuation YOU want them to state).

Good luck buddy.

 Thank you. 

It's not that I think the s&p500 is better, it's just somewhere to park it while I wait for the right deal. The stock market doesn't solve my financial independence needs.

Great idea with the fact sheet for the appraiser!

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Bud Gaffney:

@Ted Hendry refi !

 Care to elaborate?

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Max T.:

@Ted Hendry

I would not refi again just for 17k.

 Yeah.  It was a lot more appealing (35-40k) before the appraisal came back.  :\

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Brad S.:

Well, here are some thoughts, even though there is some missing info in the original post.

cash out investor loan @ 4.5% does not sound great, but that depends on some more specifics (LTV, FICO, loan amount, etc).

I just checked an online lender I know of and it looks like they will do a 30 year, 75% LTV, cash out investment (non-owner occupied) conforming loan, for Borrower with a 720+ FICO, @ 3.75% with total estimated fees of $1,919. You can get down to 3.5% with total estimated fees of $3,629. And your rate could be even .125% better with a great FICO of 740+ (3.375% @ $3,294 estimated fees) or better with higher fees. This is as of today.

So, #1 - your deal doesn't sound terrible, but not great either. But, again, that depends on your FICO, loan amount, LTV, etc.

#2) One of the only reasons to do a 15 year loan, is if you just don't want the hassle of paying extra principal on your own - kind of a forced savings account, where you are required to put a certain amount in every month. In other words, you can often get the same or similar "effective" interest rate on a 30 year loan, by just paying additional toward principal every month. But, the 30 year schedule preserves the option to pay the lower 30 year monthly payment, if you want the increased cashflow. I am sure you can find mortgage calculators online to figure that stuff out. 

#3) For most loans, you have the option of paying a minimum chunk down and then having the loan "recast" over the remaining term, which will lower your monthly payment. That way, if you decided having the cash out is not doing you any good, and just costing you money, you can just pay the principal down and essentially get back to the original loan amount. But, I think the minimum pay down may be $25k, but you have to check with the specific lender.

#4) 3.5%-4% money is still pretty cheap  and I think there should be opportunities to put it to use to make more, but $17k is not a whole lot to put to use on additional properties, in most markets.

#5) There are lenders that will do HELOCs on rental properties. That might be a way you can have the potential to easily and quickly get the cash out if needed, without having to pay for it to sit on the sidelines.

In response to some of the other things you mentioned Brad.

#1- I have used this lender for awhile, and I thought the relationship was getting me a fair deal so I wasn't shopping around.  They have been very chummy with me as a repeat customer.  Shame on me for being fooled if I've been leaving money on the table and paying higher rates than needed...we'll see what aimloan has to say.

#2 - I totally understand what you mean about 15 year not being the best strategy.  Last year when I refinanced I just wanted a lower rate, but the lender convinced me that a 15 year would save me money in the long run.  Probably good advice for the typical homeowner refinancing, but not the rental real estate investor looking to maximize leverage and cashflow.  Again...my fault for not knowing my own plan better than he would.

#4 - Yeah, $17k is not much to write home about.  Initially they were saying based on the listing info it should be closer to $200k.  But the appraisers have been getting a bit more skittish lately.  And it's not like I did a full remodel of the place or anything, just taking advantage of this crazy market.   Plus, that $17k in equity could disappear anytime the market decides to pull back, and then the opportunity to cash it out is gone.  I have about another $30k available for the next purchase, so that $17k would be a welcome boost.

#5 - Isn't the availability of a HELOC also subject to the market as well? If I cash out now, that money is available to me regardless of what happens to rates or valuations next year. A HELOC is going to depend entirely on the rate and market environment at the time that I try to get it, right? I guess I'm thinking if there is a downward correction in real estate, and my own property valuation also declines, then it's too late to do a HELOC. I would have to pull the money out now, while the market is high, and then it is unaffected by the swings in the market. Of course this is "trying to time the market", which I am not a fan of...I don't have a crystal ball and those who claim to are often wrong. However it does seem predictable and logical that rising interest rates will have a strong downward pressure on prices/valuations just because people can't afford as big of a purchase price when the monthly payment is more because of higher interest.

So it seems like now is a good time to take that money, because it could be gone by next year anyway.

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Brad S.:

Well, here are some thoughts, even though there is some missing info in the original post.

cash out investor loan @ 4.5% does not sound great, but that depends on some more specifics (LTV, FICO, loan amount, etc).

I just checked an online lender I know of and it looks like they will do a 30 year, 75% LTV, cash out investment (non-owner occupied) conforming loan, for Borrower with a 720+ FICO, @ 3.75% with total estimated fees of $1,919. You can get down to 3.5% with total estimated fees of $3,629. And your rate could be even .125% better with a great FICO of 740+ (3.375% @ $3,294 estimated fees) or better with higher fees. This is as of today.

So, #1 - your deal doesn't sound terrible, but not great either. But, again, that depends on your FICO, loan amount, LTV, etc.

#2) One of the only reasons to do a 15 year loan, is if you just don't want the hassle of paying extra principal on your own - kind of a forced savings account, where you are required to put a certain amount in every month. In other words, you can often get the same or similar "effective" interest rate on a 30 year loan, by just paying additional toward principal every month. But, the 30 year schedule preserves the option to pay the lower 30 year monthly payment, if you want the increased cashflow. I am sure you can find mortgage calculators online to figure that stuff out. 

#3) For most loans, you have the option of paying a minimum chunk down and then having the loan "recast" over the remaining term, which will lower your monthly payment. That way, if you decided having the cash out is not doing you any good, and just costing you money, you can just pay the principal down and essentially get back to the original loan amount. But, I think the minimum pay down may be $25k, but you have to check with the specific lender.

#4) 3.5%-4% money is still pretty cheap  and I think there should be opportunities to put it to use to make more, but $17k is not a whole lot to put to use on additional properties, in most markets.

#5) There are lenders that will do HELOCs on rental properties. That might be a way you can have the potential to easily and quickly get the cash out if needed, without having to pay for it to sit on the sidelines.

 Thanks Brad.  Can you PM me that lender?  I'd like to at least have a conversation with them.

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @John Teachout:

Well, if it were me, I'd have left things as they were. You don't seem to have a particular need for or a clear cut plan how to redeploy the cash. I think that the future is likely to have some instability in the financial world and having a bit of equity in the property probably wasn't a bad idea. Putting borrowed funds into equities seems like a particularly risky endeavor as the growth may be negative over the next several years. This will have to be your decision as the rest of us are only going to be giving our opinions and don't have all the data you do.

You're right, I am not quite sure of my next move, short of just continuing to acquire small multifamily unit in the next year or two.  And it is not too late to cancel the refi.

I would like to continue growing my real estate portfolio as a way to reduce my dependence on my full time job.  So far I've acquired 3 two-flat rentals, but I would like to explore larger multifamily...its hard to scale one duplex at a time, especially self managing.  Either way, the path forward will require more capital for investment.  

I 100% appreciate your thoughts on using borrowed funds for equities...not ideal, especially in a rising rate environment.

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Eric Kump:

Hey Ted, thanks for sharing your experience. I'm curious did you get any other quotes when you first started the process? 4.5% seems pretty high even with you pulling out cash..


The way that I look at it is that even if you don't love your new loan it doesn't have to be your forever loan. I'm sure rates will drop again in the future and you could cut it down even below the 3.5% you had it at. I would chalk this up as a learning experience, hind sight is 20/20... I'd still move forward with it unless you think that you will end up selling your home in the next year or two. 


If you aren't planning on staying long term another option could be to use the money to improve your home's value for the next time you are looking to do a cash out refinance? Otherwise the stock market doesn't seem like a bad place to put your money. 

It is one of my rental properties, which is why the rate is higher. I have 3 rentals, and cashing out could expedite my next purchase...or as stated, just put it in an index fund until the right opportunity comes along.

At the end of the day I just have this nagging feeling that as long as I can make a better return than the rate of interest, it's a win. Even if it's not as big of a win as I wanted.

If I try and wait until later, rates will get worse, valuations may also get worse, I make $150 less cashflow and lose any potential returns on the investment of that $17k. I think this is the best lemonade I can make of these lemons.

Post: "Cheap Money"...to refi or not, that is the question.

Todd HandrieghPosted
  • Investor
  • Lockport, IL
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 35
Originally posted by @Taylor L.:

Personally, I would stick with a past decision that was sub-optimal but good enough and focus on the next deal. Rather than continually try to optimize the past deal at the cost of time and loan costs. Right now I have a property that I could cash out refi and bring down the rate, but ultimately it makes the most sense to sell, cash out, and look for the next deal to maximize my return on equity. 

 This is the last property that I have any equity to tap, all the others are already optimized.  Even if I sold I'd still pay closing costs, and then again to purchase another, plus loss of rental cashflow in the interim, right?  

Thanks for your input!