Originally posted by "REI":
Many older investors in CA when I lived there had built up a portfolio by keeping the prior family home when they traded up. Normally people with a good career and no desire to be a full time investor. They would end up with 3-6 homes in total. It really made a difference when they wanted to retire.
This is the intention as I've seen many in the previous generation do this and retire comfortably.
But I believe it is somewhat a different ballgame now with the base real estate prices being so much higher. So is it a viable way to go about it or would liquidating it and purchasing cheaper rental properties (that still would neg cash flow) be more preferred?
Similar homes in the region rent for about $2300-2500. My current mortgage is $2450 + prop tax which is significant adding another ~500/mth and insurance so figure about $3k/mth.
The home is less than 10 yrs old and needs relatively minimal maintenance. I am very handy and will landlord and fix issues so extraneous costs should be low.
I guess the real goal is to minimize the neg cash flow. If interest rates cooperate in the near future, I'm hoping to bring the mortgage payment down to the $2200 region.