Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tara Adi

Tara Adi has started 2 posts and replied 5 times.

@Matt Devincenzo I have an update. The board and HOA hired a legal counsel for this matter, and the attorney responded in my favor and said that our by-laws do not have any clauses related to construction defect and that they pertain to building maintenance only. Therefore the HOA would have to pay for the windows per the percentage distribution. To this, the two trouble-making unit owners got a letter of their own from their own attorney which basically again cited the condo-by laws without much context, and were factually incorrect as well. They even questioned the board for going to the HOA attorney in the first place. This is expected as the attorney's opinion was not in their favor. No time was given for me to process this letter. Some of the other unit owners suggested a middle ground that the HOA pay 50% only. While 50% is better than 0%, I was put on the spot and forced to make a decision. Even had I abstained from voting, that option received majority votes. I still have to deal with mold, and damage to hardwood floors. I don't have the funds to pay a personal attorney, and frankly it'll be money down the drain. Could you please explain the second option you mentioned? About litigating through my insurance? How does that work?

Thank you. We have a set percentage split for each unit in the deed, depending on sqft of the units. I have personally spoken to 3 attorneys who all said the same thing as you, and I have communicated the same to the board. The board has hired an attorney, who I personally think isn't quite up to the mark in condominium law. They practice general real-estate law, and do sales transactions for condominium. When we spoke with them, they said, "If the common elements are restricted, then whichever owner or owners are benefiting from those limited common elements are accountable. However, given the situation, it doesn't imply that an agreement couldn't be arranged. There might be possibilities to alleviate some of the expenses through negotiation. Any resolution to share the costs would need to acknowledge the restricted nature of the common elements involved, such as the windows." Which I found to be total BS, I don't want a part of the expenses alleviated! All of it should be divided per the percentages! The only reason this attorney in question was hired is because they are a friend of someone in the building, so everyone just accepts what they tell as the absolute true fact! And the board has always been inclusive of everyone in the HOA to be a part of the decision making. So the bigger units, especially the ones trying to sell their unit, is always questioning the boards decision making, even on simple things like "hiring an attorney for legal counsel". Because they want to ensure the board hired someone they can influence. They were afraid the board hired one of the experts in condominium law that I recommended. The attorney is currently reviewing the documents. If they come out against my favor, can I coax the board HOA to at least talk to the actual attorneys who are experts in condominium law?

I wanted to share a situation regarding a persistent water intrusion problem affecting only two units within our newly constructed condo building consisting of 12 units. Since early 2022, we've been dealing with this issue, primarily near the windows. Our investigations, supported by reports from certified structural engineers and multiple masonry and window technicians, have identified defective masonry work as the root cause. We also contacted the window company, who identified it as faulty installation by the builder rather than a product defect. The issue has persisted for two years, with one of those years falling within the builder's warranty period.

Unfortunately, our attempts to address the situation with the builder have been met with unresponsiveness, even after involving legal counsel. Despite considerable deliberation, the HOA decided against pursuing legal action due to its high cost. However, the prolonged decision-making process has resulted in irreparable damage to the windows, confirmed by the window company as improper initial installation by the builder. Had the repairs been prioritized as soon as a decision was made not to sue the builder, the extent of damage would have been limited. We are getting cold draft, water intrusion through all the windows during extreme cold temperatures and rain. This has led to mold which has already started to show and warped hardwood floors.

Recently, the HOA finally resolved to commence a masonry repair project and agreed to fund the replacement and proper installation of the windows. These decisions were unanimously supported by the members present. However, two unit owners have invoked the Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement (MRR) section of the bylaws, claiming that window maintenance falls under the responsibility of unit owners. One of these unit owners, who is now refusing to pay, is also attempting to sell their unit, so obviously they don't have a vested interest in the building anymore. The other unit owner has deep pockets and is using scare mongering tactics.

It's important to note that the entire HOA, not just the board, is involved in the all of the decision-making process for the building. I've also come across an article authored by a renowned attorney in Illinois Condominium Law (https://www.cai-illinois.org/liability-condo-associations-damages-caused-failure-common-elements/) which states that since the association neglected to address the masonry issue, which is a common element, they bear responsibility for damages to the limited common element and the interior as well. Furthermore, they indicated that since this pertains to a "defect" issue, the MRR provision does not apply. Although the builder may be at fault, the responsibility now falls on the association as the HOA opted against pursuing legal action against the builder.

For added context, my insurance says to ask the HOA's insurance. The HOA's insurance won't cover it as it is due to building defect.

So, in this scenario, who is liable for the window replacement costs: the HOA or the unit owner? I'd appreciate any insights or perspectives on this matter. I don't have "deep" pockets and can't afford to hire my own $$$ attorney.

Hi experts, 

I am looking to buy a newly constructed condo with 12 units in the building. There is a rental cap of 50%. I was informed by the realtor that the condo document could be amended to reflect that I can claim a spot in the 50% cap. Is there a specific language that can be used to do so? I just want to ensure that I am not forced to sell (especially at a loss) a few years down the lane, in case I have to move to a different state. I am aware that the HOA plays a big role in this too. But I just want something concrete written in my condo doc, so that I can hash it out with the HOA in future.

Appreciate your help! 

Best,

Tara