Hey, I wanted to give you all an update on the situation. I spoke to a tree specialist and he said that that the only way a neighbor can be held liable in the City of Seattle for a fallen tree is if the neighbor does a professional tree inspection report and sends it to me by certified mail. Looks like this guy is trying to set me up by offering to pay for the inspection.
I spoke to the city and they said they don't inspect trees on private property. If I want to remove a hazardous tree, they told me I need to get a professional inspection, file for a hazardous tree removal permit, and pay potentially thousands of dollars in application fees and review fees, in addition to the tree removal.
Honestly, I just am not going to do this. That tree looks fine to me and it is holding up the hillside. If it gets removed, I think the foundation of my house is at risk. The truth is that any tree can come down in a windstorm. That doesn't mean it was hazardous and I have no reason to believe this one is.
I did offer to have my yard guy do another ivy removal. He did it a few weeks ago but this neighbor says it hasn't died off. I told him my yard guy will be there at 9am on Thursday and I will be there this week to hear what he would like to get done. Also, I will check out his claims that the ivy hasn't died off.
I guess that's where I will have to leave it. I am starting to feel harassed by this guy. Kind of wish I hadn't agreed to meet him on Thursday but I will hear him out and not commit to anything (other than removing the ivy if in fact it wasn't removed).
I have a good umbrella policy and I am in the process of putting my rentals into LLCs. I wasn't going to do this one since I plan to sell it soon but given the situation, it is worth a few hundred dollars for the extra protection.