Originally posted by @Linda Weygant:
Start Up Costs are not the same as costs incurred to put your asset into service. Start Up Costs would be things like Market Research, Legal Fees to put together an entity or to purchase an existing business, consulting with a CPA prior to starting business, etc.
Being a real estate professional does nothing for you in your case. This issue comes into play when you are looking at being able to write off passive losses when your AGI is greater than $150,000. You have neither loss nor income since your asset is not in service.
If your asset is ready to be placed into service (is habitable), then yes, as soon as you place the ad and deem it ready to be placed into service, you could then look into whether or not your upgrades are eligible for the $2500 De Minimus Safe Harbor Election.
You cannot rent a house that is not habitable, so if your remodel is such that there is no working bathroom, no working kitchen, no available heating, windows and exterior doors missing, etc., then no ad in the world is going to make your asset "in service". Even assuming somebody would live in a construction zone, if the house does not meet the legal definition of habitable, then this would not qualify.
OK, now we are getting somewhere. So, for last year (due April 2017) return, I ignore that I even had a house because it was never placed in service.
For this years return I file next April, assuming I place it into service Nov 1, I get to depreciate 2 months worth of the asset. (If I put the ad up today, can I do 2.5 months? It is habitable, we are finishing up exterior paint and yardwork.) For my basis, I figure the percentage of the sales price that is the house based on appraisers office ratio (house/house+land), then add all the mortgage interest, home insurance, PMI, RE taxes, utilities, new roof, rental trucks, gas/tolls, electrical/plumbing, appliances, drywall and labor, insulation, doors/paint/trim, lawn service, tools and tool rentals, EVERYTHING I've spent up to this point, even if it was spent in the prior year, add it to the basis, then start my 27.5 years.
I literally have to depreciate my tools over 27.5 years? Really? I don't separate them out, can't take a 179 (does that exist still?)
So, say the numbers for a full year in the future work out like this: rental income 30k, depreciation 17k, expenses 25k, I have a net loss of 12k a year. My wife makes 130k, I can only write that full 12k off against her 130k if I continue to be a real estate professional, because if its a passive loss, we are phased out down to 10k allowed losses (25k minus 50% of 30k) - unless of course we get her MAGI down far enough to allow my losses without being phased-out, in which case I don't need to worry about being a RE professional anymore.
That all sound right?