Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Account Closed

Account Closed has started 0 posts and replied 13 times.

Post: Using "And / or Assigns" vs. just "or assigns"

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Waco, TX
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 12

It is important to know the rules of your state

Post: Using "And / or Assigns" vs. just "or assigns"

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Waco, TX
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 12

I'm not making an argument against or for wholesaling. I started out this way many years ago. I am however saying that the way most wholesalers work is pretty close to acting as an agent since they have zero intent to buy the property. It is the pretending that some, NOT ALL, of those who strictly wholesale that they have an intention of buying the property that most have an issue with.

Post: Using "And / or Assigns" vs. just "or assigns"

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Waco, TX
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 12

I don't know about the rules in your state. In Texas, if you intend to purchase a property as a buyer, you can also put "and/or assigns" after the buyer's name. I think a lot of "wholesalers" in every state, tend to get very close to if not out right overstepping the line of essentially practicing real estate without a license. This is not the spirit with which "assignable contracts" are meant. I only write a contract on something I will and can close on no matter what. I do however always make it assignable and for random reasons have wholesaled 4 out of 25 deals in the past 8 months. It is usually a phone call to an investor buddy who needs inventory and I have too much. Or vice versa and they are calling me. Again, all of this is normal, wholesaling with zero intent to buy though, I would imagine in any state is more or less skating by on the technicalities regarding contracts. 

Shopping around contracts at a higher price than a seller will accept is more of what is known as a "net listing" where the agent would get any amount of an agreed price. The difference in most cases with an agent is that this is an above the board transaction where the intent of the third party (non principal) in the transaction is made clear, in writing, and governed by rules and restrictions.  Again, I know the rules, etc... and that wholesaling, at least here in Texas, is legal. However, it my point is that I believe wholesaling is meant for someone to attach a contract to another investor if they can't or no longer want to buy. Not what we know wholesaling to be currently. The fact that it is an industry within the industry speaks to how the practice has been manipulated. Essentially what we have are "investors" who have no intent or ability to buy acting as agents for the seller in the manner they would if they were providing representation to said seller on what is known as a net listing. Only the seller thinks they have solved their problem.