Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Stephen Hoskins

Stephen Hoskins has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

OK thanks Todd but you've not really responded to the content of my post at all.

I'm interested in whether any of you think that your country would be better off if it used a Land Value Tax (LVT) to replace income taxes? The basic idea is the income tax is really terrible because it punishes people from working hard to earn and income, while a tax on land value doesn't change the supply of land. This shift would improve productivity and make our countries more wealthy overall.

There are difficulties in transitioning to this system, for example a 1% LVT would instantly reduce land values by about 15%, hurting property investors. But it would also be enough to cut income taxes by about a fifth. 

What do y'all think? Would you support such a change to tax policy if it happened gradually over time? Or a sudden shift towards it if landlords were compensated for the reduction in the value of their property?