Steven,
Was just trying to communicate directly and efficiently so as
not to waste anybody's time. Sorry about that.
As to your favor of option 1, can you elaborate a bit and/or say
anything as to why it would be favorable to option 2? After I
finished typing my post above the other night, I found myself logically going toward option 2 more, since it seemed cleanest, and it allowed for a complete separation of the assets consumed by each tenant, in order to track the depreciation independently of one another.
At this point, I know I can make the final depreciation amounts
come out the way I want them to, however what I was confused about is,
what is the most acceptable practice in the industry for achieving that?
Reason I bring this up is, I have a few improvements that fall in this
category, ie, a garage, new driveway, and a privacy fence. The other assets
that I track all either align 100% for one unit or the other completely.
As for option 2, using the garage example,I imagined that I would create 2 lines on the form 4562 for the same physical asset, but that each line item would have its own 'date placed in service' and each would be placed at 100% 'investment' use percentage, and each would depreciate independently of one another, each on its own time table (i.e., both at 27.5 years, but that each asset was placed in service at different times).
Also, along these lines, a previous tax preparer recommended that I might treat each rental unit of the duplex as its own property, since each was placed into service at different times, and thereby (I assume) be represented as such on Schedule "E" in columns A and B respectively (ie, Property A= initially rented unit, and Property B=newly rented unit as of Aug 2011). In your opinion, do you think it would be best to separate the expenses and depreciation (and rental income for that matter) for each unit in separate columns on Schedule E as such?
Thanks again for your help.
Allan