Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Sriram Kumar Bikkina

Sriram Kumar Bikkina has started 7 posts and replied 33 times.

Quote from @Russell Brazil:

My house doesn't have a basement either. 

Hi Russell, thanks for the response. I noticed lot of homes without basement in the states but here in Canada that is very rare based on my observation. But yeah looks like not much difference with or without a basement.
Quote from @Mike Singh:

@Sriram Kumar Bikkina , thanks for providing more info . I haven't  heard of any specific  issues with a home without a basement due to crawl space . Maybe someone in this forum with some more reno experience might be able to help lol 

Your deal sounds good otherwise !!

Mike, thanks a lot for the detailed explanation. I took my first step into RE investing and want to get it right.

@Mike Singh, thanks a lot for the response. To elaborate, I put an offer for a semi in Kingston that doesn't have a basement. The home just has the ground level and the upper level which can be converted to a duplex quite easily and that's exactly what I am planning to do.

But while speaking to a friend, they told me that we should avoid homes without basement due to some crawl space issue or something. The one I bought doesn't have a crawl space for sure as this is 20 to 25 year old house.

This house is perfectly meeting my cashflow goal which is hard to attain in the current market and that is the exact point that motivated me to go for it. Based on the information you shared, I think I don't have to worry about it now. 

Hi All,

I won an offer to a home without basement and am wondering if I missed anything here. This is in Kingston and my realtor is very good and trustable and he did not warn me anything about homes that don't have a basement.

The semi I bought was under market and has no basement but is less than 20 years old.

Is this fine or do I need to look at anything that is concerning in these type of homes? I am not concerned about resale value as I bought this for rental potential and if that is the only concern I am okay with it.

Thanks,

Ram

Quote from @Eric Okullo:

@Chris Baxter I second your thought process. I've had friends try to get into the real estate game in Ontario and the prices of houses just don't make sense. It's like the point of diminishing returns. Are you going to rent a 720k house for $7,200 when area rents either way below this price point or non existant?


 Exactly, depending on the area a 700k property usually generates $3000 rent at max. That leaves us a negative cashflow. Duplexes or triplexes a a little better which can help us get  close to zero cashflow. That's my opinion after looking into lots of markets in Ontario.

Quote from @Scott Johnson:

@Sriram Kumar Bikkina, I also consider depreciation to be akin to cash flow, so if my actual cash flow is zero or a little above that I know I’ll be gaining more income reduction benefit from the property and the loan gets paid down over time.

Not sure about Canadian laws, but here in the US we can do a cash out refi and pull the money out tax free. The difference between this method and cash flow is that it takes longer to receive my mailbox money but it serves the same purpose and it’s tax free!

Hope this helps!

 @Scott Johnson appreciate your inputs from the US perspective. It is getting very difficult to find cash flowing properties in Canada at-least in Ontario. So my approach would now be to look for  properties that at-least cover my expenses, interest payments and as much principal as possible. This will allow me to  claim some tax deductions on expenses and go close to zero cashflow.

Quote from @Joe Splitrock:
Quote from @Chris Baxter:

@Sriram Kumar Bikkina I would not consider the interest on your HELOC as an expense on the property for cash flow determination. Interest paid to earn investment income is tax-deductible (in this case, on your personal tax return). Per @David Steinbok's point, though, the whole point of doing a cash flow calculation is to be hinest with yourself and to make sure you aren't funding the property every month. Many people will fudge numbers during analysis to have a property with +ve cash flow, even though in reality this is not the case.  


 Interest is absolutely an expense and should be included in cash flow calculations. Not including that would also be fudging the numbers. I would argue it is more important to understand the numbers. You may pay all cash for a property and have $1000 cash flow, but that isn't necessarily better than 100% financing and have $0 cash flow. It really depends on your goals and other benefits of the acquisition. As you pointed out, other factors such as taxes play into an investment. You have to look at MORE than just cash flow. Debt pay down, equity increase through appreciation, rent appreciation, future refinance, tax benefits are all other ways an investment can benefit you beyond cash flow. Thinking one dimensionally about anything is dangerous. 

That all being said, properties without cash flow can be risky. If you are just breaking even on all your properties, you may need to subsidize them with other income. That could be your W2, cash savings or other investments. 

Bottom line, keep your math accurate, but also understand what it represents. Run multiple metrics, not just cash flow.

 @Joe Splitrock, thank you for the details. Appreciate your inputs.

Quote from @Chris Baxter:

@Sriram Kumar Bikkina I would not consider the interest on your HELOC as an expense on the property for cash flow determination. Interest paid to earn investment income is tax-deductible (in this case, on your personal tax return). Per @David Steinbok's point, though, the whole point of doing a cash flow calculation is to be hinest with yourself and to make sure you aren't funding the property every month. Many people will fudge numbers during analysis to have a property with +ve cash flow, even though in reality this is not the case.  

Chris, thank you for the detailed explanation. 
Quote from @David Steinbok:

Cash flow is money left over from rent after all your expences are paid. That includes mortgage payment. If you are borrowing your downpayment and that is an expence, then I would definitly add that into your calculation as well. The purpose of buying rentals is to not use any of your paycheck money to carry the house.  So if you have to borrow the down payment as well, then your house should pay for that. Otherwise to me, that is still a bad investment. 


 David, thanks for the response. I suppose this is very tough to achieve given the current market situation? 

Quote from @Roy Cleeves:

Generally the cash flow calculation does not include interest expenses on the down payment. 

Ultimately you get to decide what your definition of cash flow is. 

Good luck and pick what works for you


 Roy, thanks for the response. This is a very very basic question but thanks for the explanation, this totally makes sense.