@Matt Lenzi like every conversation revolving around real estate investing strategies, there is a lot of nuance.
If you had money to invest in 2012, which one do you think would have made you more money?
A) A 14% cash return 8 unit in Toledo, OH
b) A break-even cash return on a 4 unit in San Diego, CA
When you're first beginning, you see option B as no bueno and option A as no brainer. Spend enough time on BP and you'll see that cash flow is king. But in some scenarios, there is more to the argument than just numbers on a spreadsheet.
If you have the ability to live in a 4plex in California and break even from the other 3 units (plus having a roommate in 4th unit), then over time, the purchase price doesn't matter. Why? Because historically speaking, the appreciation seen in California real estate will trump any cash flow numbers from secondary markets.
BUT....
You shouldn't invest solely on appreciation.
So what do you do...
This property being a "deal" depends entirely on your financial situation and your goals within this game. If you can house hack this 4plex and bring your Cali living expenses to $0, the purchase price doesn't matter. If you don't care about the down payment money and really believe in your market over the long term, then the purchase price, cash on cash return, etc doesn't matter. Looking back, do you really think a 5% return vs 7% return really matters if you could have bought a 4plex in San Diego, CA and held it for 20 years?
The point is...
Whether this property is a deal or not is completely predicated on your situation and the opportunity cost of the money you will be putting down on this property.