Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Ellie Narie

Ellie Narie has started 94 posts and replied 200 times.

Originally posted by @Jeff Ronningen:

What about when they ask for 2 years W2’s? What about when they notice the company issuing her W2 and the company he owns on his tax return are one and the same? Play by the rules and you won’t get burned playing the game.

 She doesn't have income on her tax returns, she was in college.

Also, what about people who plan to quit a job after they close on a mortgage? Are they committing fraud? 

Originally posted by @Cara Lonsdale:
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Cara Lonsdale:

.....and this is how we got to 2008.

Remind me again....what happened in the Real Estate industry that year and the many thereafter?

started well before 08  it just blew up in everyones face about that time.. like I said I personally know 2 RMLOs that got 5 years in the big house for manipulating loan apps..  

 Why even go down that road?!  It is such a slippery slope.

There are so many different legit options to explore.  None of the other options are worth jail time.

 There aren't any other legit options to buy a multifamily with low downpayment and less than 2 years of self employment history. Hard money lenders require 30% down. 

Originally posted by @Amy Beth:

I think the boyfriend needs to just stick out his job for two years if he wants a mortgage. He could continue renting with his girlfriend and putting away money for his or their future house so that he can be ready to buy when he can qualify and pay off any debts he may have.

Unless he is going to marry her it will be harder to untangle things if they break up and share a deed to a house and a mortgage. If the couple does not want to commit to spending their lives together it is not a good idea to get into a house together.

Also if they both work for the same company it is going to be obvious that she is an employee of the boyfriend’s company. The mortgage company will even want to call the owner (boyfriend) of the company to verify her employment. I do not see how this can be overcome now.

 Boyfriend's name will not be on the mortgage or the house. 

Originally posted by @Phil G.:

It's not really the length of time.  It's that it is a contrivance intended to defraud.  Whether they do a convincing enough job to avoid detection or question of impropriety or the ability to mount a good defense in the case of a prosecution is a different question.  The question originally asked, was whether it was fraud.

 I guess the real question is, is this illegal to do? And if so, how should the girlfriend obtain financing so that it is legal?

Originally posted by @Phil G.:

The deceit is boosting the paycheck with the intent of manufacturing pay stubs to induce the bank to make a loan that it wouldn't otherwise do. Neither OP nor her boyfriend qualify for the loan given the actual situation.

 I am not saying that this situation is about me. However, what would need to be done so that the girlfriend qualifies for the loan without it being fraud? As I was asking before, is there a certain time period that the boyfriend has to pay her the higher income so that it wouldn't be considered fraud? 

Originally posted by @Eric James:

To me this example demonstrates some silliness of mortgage rules that won't count SE income but will allow any employer paid income.

 Exactly. The boyfriend makes plenty of money and would love it if he could qualify for a mortgage on his own, but unfortunately, he can't, because he doesn't have two years of self-employment history. Would it be fraud to do this workaround? 

Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:

in the day these were basically called Liar loans.

now a days the mortgage broker can literally end up in Jail participating in these schemes.  if your mortgage broker lays out a plan that he or she can agree with.. then your probably OK I am not any kind of expert on owner occ loans.. but I do know of a few RMLOs in OREGON that ended up in Sheridan for these acts.. ( Sheridan is state prison)

 I looked up the definition of liar loans, and it looks like people actually lied on their income and didn't have proof of income. I'm talking about having proof of income for just a month or two. Would the girlfriend have to reveal the fact that she works for her boyfriend and that she doesn't plan to "earn" this much income later on? 

Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:

what do you think.. ???

 I don't know, that's why I'm asking. How can the boyfriend and girlfriend make sure that they're not committing fraud but still get a mortage? Should the boyfriend pay the girlfriend the same salary for 6 months? A year? How long should the boyfriend pay that same (higher) salary to the girlfriend so that it is not considered mortgage fraud? 

Let's say there's an unmarried couple with kids. Boyfriend has a business and is considered self employed, but he can't get a mortgage because he doesn't have two years of self employment income. So, he "hires" his girlfriend to "work" at his business, but she really doesn't so much if anything, he just gives her a paycheck. However, at first, the purpose of this paycheck wasn't to get a mortgage, hence, her paycheck is only like $1000. BUT, now they want to get a house, specifically a 2-4 unit owner occupied with FHA loan. So what the boyfriend does is he will take money out of his savings account and increase the girlfriend's income for just a month or two so she can qualify for a bigger loan, so that her paystub shows that she makes a lot. And then after she closes on the loan, he will reduce her income back to the 1000. Now, girlfriend has been going to college full time for the last two years, so it's not like mortgage brokers will care about two years of income, because she can substitute that with her full time college transcripts.

Would this scenario be considered mortgage fraud, where the boyfriend specifically increases girlfriend's income (even takes money out of his savings account to do so) for just a month or two so she could qualify for a bigger mortgage loan?