Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Steven M.

Steven M. has started 9 posts and replied 60 times.

Post: Seeking Info on The Current Phoenix, AZ Marketplace...

Steven M.Posted
  • Developer
  • Encino, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 15

I am a Land Use/Land Impact Analyst in Los Angeles. I have some clients that have expressed interest in perhaps purchasing and developing raw land in the greater Phoenix area for spec building. They are aware of the significant increase in homes prices, bidding wars of homes, low inventories, lower unemploymentm etc. etc. I thought I'd throw out some feelers here on BP and ask if anyone living there has actually seen "rare sightings" (I'm being a bit clever) and a recent surge of new homes being built for spec in and around the Phoenix metro. I was wondering if the market has reached the "extreme measure" where you actually see NEW homes going up (and more than a few) as you have driven around in the past few months. Thanks in advanced for your market intel and watchful eye.

There is no diversity of home ownership anymore. Owner ocuppiers are becoming rare. You got a huge population of "investors" a herd mentality. If you have a one dimensional market of millions of investor owned homes, too much concentration of one kind of owner, that spells trouble in my mind in untold ways. We had too much concentration and a one dimensional market already with sub-prime borrowers. We know what happend with that. Too much of one thing without diversity is not a good thing.

Originally posted by Matt Jankowski:
Ok, it seemed from your earlier posts that the crisis you foresee has as a prerequisite a rebound in prices. I think that doesn't make sense.

You are correct to identify that the demographics of home-ownership are changing, and you are correct to think that such a shift will have consequences, but it probably won't be as simple as an "investor sell-off".

Some things I think about: Investors perform maintenance on their properties in different ways. They finance properties in different ways. When investors renovate to flip, they do so to very different standards than the home-owner himself would.

10,20,30 yrs down the road, these changes will surely have an effect on something, but what will it be?

My concern/thoughts that there will be a big broad shake out of these "fakers" and "early/short-term dumpers" and I am feeling there are more than we think who are doing this by the seat of their pants. I just hope they all don't start dumping the market with homes in a concentrated / short span time.

Originally posted by Michael Quarles:
Where are the fab 5 on this topic. J. W. B. C. & J.

To the post: Personally I don't care. I buy and sell based upon the current market. And investors are already dumping property. They're called shorts. Our profession should push those out who can't hang and reward those who see the light.

From your mouth to the man upstairs ears!

Originally posted by Albert Hasson:
Steven, I understand your argument but I don't think it's likely that one day everybody who bought a rental house in the past few years is going to sell all at once. There are going to be many like myself who will hold them for 10 or more years. Others who are looking to make a quick profit may sell over the next few years but certainly not all at once. Here in Phoenix we are up 25% from our low last August and rising at a 3% monthly rate, yes monthly rate. Inventory is so low now it's unbelievable. There is tremendous pent up demand for housing so any inventory released by investors in the next few years will definitely be absorbed IMHO

I hope you are right Albert but I have fears in places espcially like Phoenix, Vegas, Miami etc has too many homes owned by one type of investor. Not everyone will have the patience, timeline, finances, efforts or whatever to own rental properties.

On another matter, are you seeing a lot of spec homes being built in Phoenix? I have some clients who are looking to buy land there. Don't have have a pulse on the building market there (if there is any). I am aware of the heated market there. Thanks!

[/b]

Originally posted by Matt Jankowski:
This is what your hypothesis sounds like to me:
Prices will rise, causing investors to sell, causing prices to fall ->
Rising prices = falling prices?

If your theory is that a rebound in housing prices will directly lead to a crash in prices, I believe your concept is contradictory.

It is possible that we could expect appreciation beyond a certain point to be mitigated by investor sell-off, "profit taking" as prices rebound. In fact, you could make the argument that this is happening now. I know that in my market and in many others, volume is way up but prices are not necessarily rising in correspondence. This could be one answer.

Post: Update on Building home instead of rehabbing for profit.

Steven M.Posted
  • Developer
  • Encino, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 15
Originally posted by Jennifer Beadles:
Hi All!

So I would love to have a very clear, line item answer for my costs.. but it varies from municipality to amount of dirt I have to move and/or where the nearest utilities are. Here is the last deal I did (which wasn't necessarily my best, but it was a rural area and winter).

Lot acquisition price: $66,961
Permits/mitigation fees: $6000
Total building costs: $181,400
-includes all materials, labor, septic tank & drainfield, utilities, staging, landscaping ect

Total : $254,361
Net on closing HUD after commissions ect: $302,835
Total Profit: $48,474

The house was 2677 sf w/3 car garage so with permits and total building costs the square footage price was $70.

Thanks Jennifer. Boy, I now really gotta move out of this hole of L.A. I live in.

Post: Update on Building home instead of rehabbing for profit.

Steven M.Posted
  • Developer
  • Encino, CA
  • Posts 65
  • Votes 15
Originally posted by Rich Weese:
Jennifer seems to be busy, so here is mine. We just received a "clear to close" from the underwriter today on a 2 story spec in my TX subdivision. Appraised at $174,200. Home is 4 BR 21/2 baths, 2 car garage, granite tops, fully fenced and FULLY landscaped.

2028 sq. ft.
$107,701 TOTAL costs w/o lot. I own the subdivision, so lot costs are low- $12,200 although I'm currently selling them at $23,900+
price per sq ft is $53.10 w/o lot

I would be close to my $50 sq ft without rear sod and fencing. This is a nice home with rock/brick on front, auto gar door openers, most appliances etc.

I sold home for 174K with some concessions. Rich
p.s. If I left something out, just ask.

Where abouts in TX is this Rich?

You all make great points and are spot on but my chief concern is that we now have a one dimensional population of homeowners: Investors. That's not a good thing. That's how we all got into this mess in the first place. We had a huge population of one dimensional homeowners: sub-prime borrowers. Assuredly, these many thousands or hundreds of thousands of "investors" people buying up these cheap homes can't and aren't ALL suited nor will want to be landlords for long, nor are they ALL "buy and holders" and certainly not ALL are financially fit to be property owners.

My concern is that we have too much of one singular population of homeowners today and not all of them are going to be hanging on for 10 or 15+ years. Most will cash-out and flood the market with too many homes when they can't handle it or they see prices tick up even a bit. There is no diversity of home ownership anymore. You got a huge population of "investors" a herd mentality, and I think it's a VERY large sum of people who will want to be out of it in 5 years or less for whatever reason you can think of. This is not a good thing. As a land developer, this is not a good thing.

Mark is right, 5-15 years before prices rebound, closer to the 15 in my opinion especially in places like here in CA, NV, FL and AZ. My take eon real estate: go where the jobs are and companies are moving (like Texas) and low cost of loving.

I think we have traded in one serious problem for another and that story has yet to be told. You can't have one type of homeonwer out there or the domino effct will happen all over again.

I would like to address a concern I have about the herd-mentality of everyone and their uncle becoming "investors" and how this is likely to have very serious long term implications on housing that few have thought much about. This is my concern:

For the past several years the housing market has been predominantly made up of many thousands of cash-only investors buying up millions of cheap homes across the country. Many drawn by the allure of being real estate "moguls" and by unscrupulous real estate DVDs/Books/Seminars/Mentors/Infomercials come-ons etc. Being circumspect as I am, I ask myself this: I want to know when this country finally gets out this real estate rut in the next couple of years (assumingly), what will happen to the millions of homes owned by most of these starry-eyed investors who want out and aren't in this for the long haul.

I am in fear we will invariably have a whole new set of huge problems (not foreclosures): either the wide-eyed (many) inexperienced investors (now “landlords”) wanting to get out of being a landlord; investors wanting to simply cash-out sooner ("this is not for me") than later or for whatever reason they have to dump/sell their investment homes. Thus creating a potential flood of investor-owned homes in the market diluting home prices further. And here we go again...but now with a whole different set of real estate problems: too many investors selling their homes all at the same time in a short few year time span as soon as they see prices starting to notch up ("sell and take the money and run"). I fear avery large number of these people who got into the foreclosure buying boom will all be dumping their houses on to the market place to get out of this. Look, not all these investors today can be in it for the long haul and want to be in it for years to come. The minute prices go up and the economy picks up, like Wall Street, it will be 'sell, sell, sell'!

Seemingly, this notion will curb future home building with too many investors cashing-out of their investments flooding the market. It's inevitable. I am just concerned we are just shifting one problem (foreclosures) for another (investor dumping) in a few years from now. Am I missing something here? I don't hear much talk about this potential looming problem.

Just a thought.