Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Shelly Glennon

Shelly Glennon has started 2 posts and replied 3 times.

FYI, I am not the one in the middle of the negotiations, just trying to get myself learning and understanding as I will likely be the one managing the Partnership for the next generation.

It looks like it's a 3% commission.  I get where y'all are coming from in terms of "be happy you've had a long, stable tenant," and yet I want to point out they have greatly benefited from being in the building this long as well.  They have pretty much always paid below market rates, have never had to worry about moving, up until this renewal, lease renegotiations have been quick and easy, all done between the Partnership and company directly, no professionals, no commissions.  

So, yeah, I get it, it's been a good setup for both parties.

That being said, (and perhaps this is my naivete coming into this new space) the fact that after all this time they decided to outsource the lease renewal negotiations feels like a "them" issue and like a one-off fee.  Again, perhaps my naivete, but it seems to me that commissions are largely about "finding" a tenant, hence it making sense to get ongoing commissions as long as that tenant lasts.  The renegotiated lease is largely taking the existing lease and just specifying the updated market rate and new lease term.

Family holds a light industrial property that has been leased to the same large utility company since the 80s and has never had a commission associated with the lease.  The lease was coming due and as part of renegotiating the next term, the tenant stopped doing lease negotiations in house and now there is a commission associated with the lease.  Tenant basically said they would agree to current market rate if landlord pays the new commission, or at a lower rate they would cover the commission.  Is it just me or does this seem very odd?  This is an existing tenant, no tenant search required, literally just the legal process of negotiating a new lease and signing it.  Why would there be a commission involved at this point?  And further, if it's the tenant who decided to stop negotiating in-house, why would any of that cost be on the landlord?

Hi, I'm new to BP forums, but been listening/reading for a few years. We have a family partnership that holds some commercial properties (light industrial) and I am looking to help resolve some family disagreements by finding a cash out refi option. The property has been owned outright for over 70 years, has had the same tenant over 50 years (a utility company), and we are looking at taking out around 40% LTV, and the mortgage payments would be covered 2-3x by the rental income, so very stable, safe lending situation.

Based on my research so far it seems the most easy to find CRE mortgages are short term (up to 10 years, though amortized 25-30), but I have also seen people repeatedly state that you CAN find longer term CRE loans. I will continue digging around for those lenders myself, but figured this would be a perfect forum to ask for advice. Thanks!