Thanks for all the replies. I understand what y'all mean. Well, let me explain it another way. Let's say I acquire the house solely and "hire" my contractor to do the rehab. The thing is, he'll do so much more than that. The day the house closes, my realtor will give him the keys. He will have scoped out the work, so he'll start right in doing demo, getting materials, etc. I'll talk to him on the phone about work updates, scheduling, and choosing finishes, but he'll be 100% there doing it while I'm 800 miles away. I'm planning to use an iPhone app where we can do video in real time, so I'll get periodic live updates via video that way. Eventually, he'll meet the realtor and plan out the open houses, though of course I'll set the pricing with my realtor. I don't even think I'll be there to close when I buy or close when I sell. So I'm really hands off, by and large - and it really shows the extent to which it's all his work on site. Which is to say, if I didn't know him and trust him, I wouldn't even consider flipping in that city. It's because we've worked together and he's into starting with flipping that I'm wanting to do it. That's why I want to make sure we both win, not like I'm just paying him a wage.
I suppose it makes sense to start out with me 100% in control, and when he has some skin in the game, then we can work out different numbers. The thing is, as it stands, he may make $10,000 doing the work, I'm in for $10,000 of material, and after expenses maybe I end up making $10,000, so it's like we're 50/50 partners anyhow. Could be - I don't know, but I'm just throwing out numbers. I feel that by being partners (whether that's legally stated or otherwise arranged) that he'll be motivated to get it done fast and definitely right and be in the game, not just punching a clock. Does that make sense?
So all said, what do y'all think is the best working arrangement in this scenario?