All Forum Posts by: Seby T.

Also got additional info that the tenant who lived at the property  is  a convicted criminal on probation. The mugshot of the criminal available online doesn't match the picture in Driver License of the "tenant" who supposedly signed the lease. Whatever NASA technology  they used, seems like the PM  can't match the face of real person to the picture in DL !

Originally posted by @Steve Maginnis:

Hello @Seby T.. I'm sorry to hear you have to go through this. It must be extremely stressful for you and many others going through similar issues. I think it would be difficult to go after the PM in this scenario, but I could be wrong.  While I don't have much else to offer, I am very interested in hearing what technology NASA uses for managing properties?  Did they give you any insight as to what that is?  My instinct is to laugh at that, but my curiosity is piqued.  

Originally posted by @Theresa Harris:

The PM should have checked.   Was there anything in the unit to suggest someone else was living there (or the real name of the person they rented to)?

Originally posted by @Valentina Naumenko:

What a craziness. Hmm. If they have never lived there, then how did they get a court notice about the hearing? It is mailed to the property. As per PM, normally we use Transunion or other channels for a background check. Paystubs, Landlord verification, ID. Then we interview the applicants. Finally, when we do a move-in inspection, we check the ID to make sure that we deal with the right "tenant".  See what was done first.  If you find that PM was negligent, then maybe you can seek a reimbursement for damages from the PM or PM's insurance.