Jerryll,
I stand by my statement 100%. No buyers...no business. You have a limited amount of time to sell a property, once you sign a contract. Here's what you said: "You don't need a buyers list when, you are honest with the seller and explain your plans to wholesale the house." So what if the seller objects to your terms? What if the seller says I need to sell within 30 days? I could go on and on. You either don't get the contract signed and go back to square one or you get it signed. Of course you should be honest with the seller. But that doesn't mean that they won't ask for a hefty deposit and give you a limited amount of time to sell it. If that's the case, the wholesaler has to come up with the money. The what if they don't find a buyer? They just lost their money!
Does a "killer" deal, make it easier to sell a property? Yes. Does a "killer" deal mean that if you don't have buyers, you'll still sell it? No. Typically, you get 30 to 45 days on a contract. If you don't have a buyer waiting in the wings, the clock starts ticking immediately. It's difficult enough to get a deal closed within 30 days, when you already have a buyer, let alone NOT having a buyer. So if you don't have one, you have to "go fish" for one. That takes time. An inspection has to be done, title has to be run, the buyer might want to go look at the property, the buyer might need to get his contractor into the house etc. You're asking for major trouble, trying to find a buyer after you sign a contract! I've seen more wholesalers lose deals, simply because they didn't have a buyer. I'm talking about good deals, not some garbage deal. You're putting the cart way before the horse and you're setting yourself up for disaster! Why would anyone with common sense, risk all of that? If they have a buyers list, the house gets sold right away, the buyer can put down the deposit and it can close quickly. It doesn't make any sense to take such risks, especially when there's absolutely no reason to.
BTW, I discuss with my students, in length, what constitutes a good deal. They know what a good deal is and what a bad deal is. They know how to run the numbers. Would you buy and sign a contract for a new car, before you had the money? Of course not! Why? Because it's a risk and it's simply bad business. What makes real estate any different?
When you tell a wholesaler that if they have a killer deal they'll find a buyer, IMO, you're setting them up for disaster. What if they don't find a buyer? Then what happens? EVERYONE involved in the transaction just got screwed. That's what happens. The house isn't sold, the homeowners are ticked off, the wholesaler worked his butt off trying to find a buyer and didn't make a dime for his efforts. As a result, he gets screwed as well. There might also be earnest money involved that the wholesaler loses too. I know, I know, if he "sets" up the deal properly, that won't happen. Do you now understand what I'm trying get new wholesalers to understand? Why in the world would you risk losing thousands of dollars and working your butt off for absolutely nothing? It just doesn't make sense! Yes, you might find a great deal and be able to sell it on social media or wherever. If that happens, you lucked out. If you think you that will happen on every "great" deal every time, without having a buyers list, you're in for a very rude awakening.
I will always stand by: no buyers...no business. When you go to into business, you're suppose to do your best to eliminate risk or manage it the best way possible. if you have no buyers, you're not managing or eliminating risk. You're actually increasing your risk and why in the world would you do that? It just doesn't make any sense. Obviously you're more than welcome to run your business the way you see fit. But to try and convince new wholesalers they don't need a buyers list first, is just plain wrong.