Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Chris M. ... When evaluating an applicant, do you back out the depreciation reported on the tax returns in order to determine the "true" cash flow? I remember this being an issue on one mortgage of ours, but not the subsequent one. Not sure what changed in the interim.
Yes, everyone should be doing that. Fire any loan officer that doesn't know that. Fannie has basically three different ways of calculating cash flow; Freddie and most jumbo follow Fannie's lead. There are several ways you can arrive at the exact same number; I've found the quickest is to take gross rent, subtract recurring non-PITI expenses, divide the resulting number by 12, and subtract actual PITI from that.
If you want to argue that something is a non-recurring expense that you shouldn't be hit with, like a massive electrical upgrade, be ready with receipts and invoices.
If you want me to use rent * 75% instead of the Schedule E calculation, because it was a BRrrrrrrrrr that so far looks like crap on your tax returns, and you REALLY want to avoid the back and forth BS with underwriting (trust me your LO hates that more than you do!), be ready with all the invoices, and ideally show me a crap ton of before and after pics (that might be built into the photos in the purchase appraisal and then refinance appraisal, but take a dozen before/after pics from the exact same angles anyways), paired with invoices/receipts that dollar-for-dollar match your tax returns. Line 19, "Other (list)" is a great place for your CPA to put "See Stmt 1" and then Statement 1 has itemized expense (1), (2), (3), etc, that matches a bunch of invoices or receipts that you've written (1), (2), (3), etc, on, and oh look I even have before/after pics with (1), (2), (3) written on them! CPA may want to put it under "repairs" and lump it all together -- no no! We want it broken out so we can overwhelm underwriting with evidence!
Hey Chris,
Wouldn't at some pThanks!oint a person hit the 10 loan limit? Scratch that. Answered my own question. :)