Christopher - you're thinking the same way I am. Let me know if you find that article.
Ralph - you make some great points and that is exactly what I'm wrestling with. I would like to work with investors because I am one, but working with retail sellers and buyers is fine too. First and foremost I want to be an investor myself. Staying in real estate as an agent (as opposed to picking up accounting work, which is my background) will give me more flexibility to continue and be closer to my personal investing. It seems that the market is good for building a niche and representing investors as a buyers agent. One concern is that the homes investors buy homes at a much lower price point. In my county investors purchases would be at ~100k versus the ~250k median price of homes sold to retail buyers. So I'd have to sell more than twice as many investor homes than retail homes to get comparable commissions.
The other thing I'm bouncing around is whether I should stay with my discount broker that offers 100% commission with no day to day support, or join a traditional broker (with a strong brand name) that will take a big chunk of my commission, but will provide significant training on traditional real estate listings and buyer representation and will also allow me to focus on investors and/or retail buyers.
I've only been a Realtor for 3 months and I don't have any traditional training, I'm kind of learning as I go.
It seems that going to the full service brokerage would be my best option only if it's realistic that I can do both 1) build a niche working with investors and 2) also develop a more traditional book of business focused on maximizing listings so when the market turns I'm positioned to benefit from the pick up in retail sales.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Sanford