Originally posted by @Paul Vail:
I don't have anything but empathy for you and a tenant that's clearly heading to the curb.
Maybe adjust your future leases -- Is there a regulation/law in Chicago that would preclude 'refunding excess rent'? My half-baked idea: charge a bit more every month as an 'ongoing maintenance escrow' or some similar language. Maybe $50 more than you'd otherwise charge, but with the stipulation that any excess 'escrow' at the end of their tenancy would be reimbursed. Then basically the tenant is building your 'security deposit' over time, without using that language? Naturally, longer-term tenants would create a substantial reimbursement, so maybe discontinue additional collections after 5 yrs, or a rent-reduction for 'long-term' residents. I've just started listening to the podcasts (I'm on 97 now) -- so I've heard you have an encyclopedic rulebook up there for landlords. Maybe there's a loophole to use as a future carrot. Wouldn't matter with this guy, but could solve solutions moving ahead?
Hi Paul, there are a lot of stipulations for holding money, such as a security deposit, for a tenant in Chicago specifically. This is why I didn't take a security deposit, to begin with. Therefore, I don't think this option is feasible. Thanks though!