Thanks for all of the feedback.
To sum up, if I understood correctly, the options are:
1) Have the owner list and sell as-is and hope it closes before the bank finishes the foreclosure. I would make an arrangement with the owner to get compensation (on the side) for my help cleaning, etc. This option results in the most money for the owner, least risk (and money) for me, and still has the risk of foreclosure.
2) I make a loan to the owner to reinstate the bank loan which would get them back in good graces with the bank. Have the owner list and sell as-is and hope it closes before the whole foreclosure thing starts/finishes again. This option gets me more money (if it doesn’t foreclose), allows more time to sell but still eventually has the risk of foreclosure.
3) I help the owner pay for some of the repairs, create a loan for compensation, list and sell partially rehabbed for maybe a little higher price and hope it closes before the bank finishes the foreclosure. This option might make a little more money but the risk of foreclosure is the same as option 1.
4) Bring in a 3rd party rehabber to finance the repairs and pay for holding costs, list and sell at a higher price after rehab, then split the net returns. This option allows more time to sell but any profit would be split between more parties. This might be a good option if rehab costs are low, rehabbed sell price is high and holding costs are reasonable. Eliminates the foreclosure risk.
5) Have the owner sign over the property to me (SUB2) for some reasonable consideration to them at closing. I would do one of the first 4 options above but now as the owner. If this deal goes to foreclosure, the owner would still have a foreclosure on their record and I would not make anything on the deal (also might lose a friend) unless I went with option 4 and bring in a 3rd party.
Clarification question – If I take over a property SUB2, am I actually the “owner” or is the current owner still at risk of foreclosure?
Are there any other options already proposed that I missed?
I heard about a method where you can sell to someone who wants to buy a house and can pay the payments but can’t get conventional financing.
6) Option 6 might be this: I loan money to the owner to reinstate the bank loan, help find a buyer who would do the rehab for equity consideration. Create “wrap-around” loan(s) to buyer where I get payments on the loan to reinstate the original bank loan plus some extra consideration for my efforts and the current owner gets the rest of the payments. The current owners, and I, continue to receive payments from the new buyer. The current owner continues to pay on the bank loan. This option might result in the most money for me and the current owner but profits are spread out over a longer time and there is a risk that the new owners might not continue to pay which would start the whole thing over again.
Do any of you have experience with something like option 6? What are the risks/benefits? If it is a legitimate idea, how would I find a buyer, etc.? How does it work from the buyer’s and seller’s perspectives regarding property taxes, insurance, income taxes, etc.?