Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Rud Sev

Rud Sev has started 3 posts and replied 14 times.

Post: High level of taxes for syndication

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8

Thank you all for your information and feedback. I learned a great deal, appreciated!

Post: High level of taxes for syndication

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Evan Polaski:

@Rud Sev, I would ask the syndicators you are considering if they have any sample K-1s they have issued in the past to try to get a general idea of how they treat their common taxable items.

There are a few things that are likely needed to be outlined:
Your capital account balance for the investment, i.e. how much money the syndicator is saying you have outstanding at any time and used to calculate preferred returns, can vary from your taxable capital balance shown on K-1.  My next comments are ONLY for tax purposes and may not align with how the waterfall works in the offering.

Your syndicator may treat all distributions paid to you, up to your full capital balance and any allocated debt, as a return of capital for tax purposes.  This is often shown in the distributions box, and reduces your taxable basis in the deal.  Net effect, typically, means distributions are not taxed in current year, but do lower your basis resulting in larger tax bill upon sale.

Depreciation reflected in the net gain/loss from rental box on K-1.  As noted in articles Michael noted, this may or may not have any real impact on your taxes, depending on if you have any other passive gains/income to offset.  Net losses here also reduce your taxable basis making sale gains larger from a tax perspective.

If you don't have any depreciation, you can owe taxes on the net rental income, even if no distributions were made to you.  If syndicator is building reserves for the first year of ownership, for instance, and not paying distributions, AND recognizes rental profit, you will have a larger tax bill that year, since you "made money" in the IRS's eyes, even though you did not receive any cashflow from your syndicator.

On a more general note, a preferred return does not mean you will get that amount of cash flow each year.  It is simply a return threshold that needs to be hit before the GP can share in any profits above that level.  


 Thank you Evan! This is exactly the answer I was looking for!

Post: High level of taxes for syndication

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Sean O'Keefe:
Quote from @Rud Sev:

Sorry @Sean O'Keefe, I shouldn't have used the word "gain". I meant yearly K-1 reports showing yearly income from cash flow (prior to year of sale), would those be taxed as ordinary income please?

Hopefully, now you have enough info to talk to your current CPA and get clarity, You are using the word "cash flow" and this could be income or a distribution based on the scenario you described. If you look at @Michael Plaks article you'll notice that the distribution isn't taxable. 

.

.

.

*This post does not create a CPA-client relationship. The information contained in this post is not to be relied upon. Readers are advised to seek professional advice.

Thank you Sean, sorry I've bad at explaining the general use case I'm interested in. The case I was interested in was distribution, leading to income reported in K1 (e.g. depreciation doesn't match the income made that year). I should have used income instead of cash flow. 

Post: High level of taxes for syndication

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8

Sorry @Sean O'Keefe, I shouldn't have used the word "gain". I meant yearly K-1 reports showing yearly income from cash flow (prior to year of sale), would those be taxed as ordinary income please?

Post: High level of taxes for syndication

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8

A quick follow up that I have (I understand things can really quickly become complicated): if there is cash flow, and that cash flow is larger than any depreciation (assume no cost segregation), K-1 reports a gain, is this gain considered to be ordinary income please?

Post: High level of taxes for syndication

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Michael Plaks:

Thank you @Michael Plaksgreat article. Particularly enjoyed the second one - it may have left me with more questions than answers, but I think I get more of the gist of it. Thanks!

Post: High level of taxes for syndication

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8

Hello,

I am new to the world of syndication (LP investor) and want to understand how taxes at a high level for syndication as LP before asking individual specific questions to my CPA.


Notably, I want to understand how preferred returns/cash flows are taxed, if at all, until the amount invested has been returned. I could not find the answer I'm looking for when searching.

The following example could be used:

- Amount invested $100k

- Preferred return (5 years): 8% or $8k

- Disposition (Sale) (Year 5): $200k

This simple example assumes no cash flow beyond the preferred return, no cost segregation/bonus segregation, and doesn't take depreciation into account.

Would the first 5 years of cash flow (preferred return) not be taxed, and only the remaining amount on the disposition would be taxed (e.g. $200k - $100k + 5 * $8k = $140k)?  Would the federal tax liability be $140k at year 5 for the sale, with long term capital gains (ignoring any Net Investment Income Tax)?

If there is a good post or article regarding this topic, I'd be happy to read it. Thank you!

Post: Carry back or forward loss from sale of real estate

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8

Thank you both very much!

I’ve asked my CPA to walk me through any NOL carryforward and just in general how the carryforward losses were calculated as well. Thank you.

Post: Carry back or forward loss from sale of real estate

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8

Hi Michael,

Thank you, I will message my CPA asking for a more detailed explanation.

I've been inquisitive with my CPA, but unless I ask question I do not get explanation (and unfortunately not a walk-through), although I've shown interest understanding this further and further.

I'll try to reformulate my question more clearer (and with more data) - the problem that I have and will have is figuring out if my questions and confusion are due to a lack of understanding on my part, or my CPA is truly making mistakes.

Regarding carry back, thank you for this info. I ran into this recent TurboTax article  that led me to believe it was possible: Second, you may have a net operating loss (NOL) if the Section 1231 loss is large enough to reduce your other income below zero. If so, you can carry back the NOL for at least two years and use it to offset taxable income in those years.

Post: Carry back or forward loss from sale of real estate

Rud SevPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Mountain View, USA
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 8

Hello,

I sold 2 properties at a loss in 2023, and one property for a small gain in 2023. When looking at my tax return from my CPA, the losses and gains show up on Form 4797 (Part I for the losses and the gain in Part III).

I noticed that the loss from Part I was shown on schedule 1 line 4. and helped zero my taxable income in Form 1040 line 15 (I had a negative total income on line 9 and 11). This is great, although it looks like I couldn't use the standard deduction due to the loss. I am having a doubt here, as this seems like active losses from the sale, whereas the property was a commercial rental property held > 1 year. This is my first flag.

My total income is negative, so my loss is greater than this year's income. However, my CPA has a carryover capital loss worksheet for next year which pulls in losses from Schedule D / Form 8949 (sell of stocks), but not the long term capital loss from selling rental income property (on form 4797). This is m second flag. I am also reading the section 1231 regarding net operating loss (NOL) and wonder if the leftover could be carried back on the last 2 years of tax return?

I am unsure if my CPA has: 1) mischaracterized the losses from the sale of my rental income properties, and 2) is missing out (either carry back for 2 years, or future carryover) the loss from the sale. If there is any doubt, I would seek a second opinion but I am unsure if my CPA is wrong in this case, or if I should question further. This may be trivial and I may be missing something simple.

Thank you for your help and guidance.