Originally posted by Dave Kennedy:
Good post, its more difficult to buy a home then a rental property. Since its much easier to get a value using the income approach.
What is a good way to determine a homes value excluding all the peaks and valleys? Would you take a long term growth rate of RE (3-4%?)?
Thanks for your reply Dave.
Most of the homes are rentable. Of course, our discussion should exclude those multi-million dollar luxury homes that do not have established rental market. I think the easiest way to look at it is: does a home of interest has a rental market? And if the answer is positive, the home is not really a "consumer good" and we can use Income Approach without much risk.
The bottom line is, if we're not doing that, somebody from somewhere will be and the value of that home of interest will gravitate towards the fundamental value anyway (standard pricing arbitrage in place).
Ironically, standard plain vanilla Income Approach will get you a static home value. That means, the home value you calculate will be the same next year, and next next year, and next next next year, and that doesn't take into consideration of the real estate risks (peaks and valleys). HouseMiners.com actually employs a Nobel Prize winning methodology to calculate the so-called home-buying barrier price. The valuation model shares the same root with Black-Scholes model (celebrated and well-known valuation model for financial options), and is capable to take future price fluctuation into consideration.
I hope it doesn't sound too technical ... :roll: But price fluctuation is a fact in real estate market, and I believe the industry is going that direction since most of the players are getting more and more concerned about the risks of price fluctuation.