Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jason Parks

Jason Parks has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

Originally posted by Dave Kennedy:
Good post, its more difficult to buy a home then a rental property. Since its much easier to get a value using the income approach.

What is a good way to determine a homes value excluding all the peaks and valleys? Would you take a long term growth rate of RE (3-4%?)?


Thanks for your reply Dave.

Most of the homes are rentable. Of course, our discussion should exclude those multi-million dollar luxury homes that do not have established rental market. I think the easiest way to look at it is: does a home of interest has a rental market? And if the answer is positive, the home is not really a "consumer good" and we can use Income Approach without much risk.

The bottom line is, if we're not doing that, somebody from somewhere will be and the value of that home of interest will gravitate towards the fundamental value anyway (standard pricing arbitrage in place).

Ironically, standard plain vanilla Income Approach will get you a static home value. That means, the home value you calculate will be the same next year, and next next year, and next next next year, and that doesn't take into consideration of the real estate risks (peaks and valleys). HouseMiners.com actually employs a Nobel Prize winning methodology to calculate the so-called home-buying barrier price. The valuation model shares the same root with Black-Scholes model (celebrated and well-known valuation model for financial options), and is capable to take future price fluctuation into consideration.

I hope it doesn't sound too technical ... :roll: But price fluctuation is a fact in real estate market, and I believe the industry is going that direction since most of the players are getting more and more concerned about the risks of price fluctuation.

Buying a a property is like buying a business. Nobody wants to pay too much for a business that generates only so much profits. Similarly, we need to think rationally about a property from an income approach, just like how the bankers think about a business.

You may ask: what if I'm buying one for my own use? The answer is: you should treat the home you're buying like an investment property equally. The key idea here is you want to find out the fundamental value of a home. And history tells us that all properties and assets go back to its fundamental value sooner or later. That means, relying only on speculative values set forth by people in real estate market can cost you big discount of your net worth later when property values really adjusts. Unless you have couple million dollars sitting in your bank account, the chances are, you care about your net worth. The bottomline is you don't want to pay too much for what a property is really worth fundamentally.

Owning a property gets you a series of rental income. So the income approach actually makes you think backward: For the rental income that you're getting regularly, how much would you want to pay for it? Savvy investors and bankers know that we can employ the so-called Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method. We're not going to take 10 pages to discuss it. But the key point here is, you want to compare the fundamental value (we call it Rent-Implied Home Value) with the selling price out there to determine if it's a bargain or not.

If your property value deviates largely from your Rent-Implied Home Value, beware! This is a strong evidence that your home value has large bubble content.

Some of the tips to avoid getting caught by bubble are:
1. Check how much is needed to maintain the gross rental income
People who are familiar with Rent-Implied Home Value concept may try to inflate it by hidding the ongoing costs needed to maintain the grosss rental income. Two properties may get you the same rental income, but one of them may cost you whole lot more to maintain.

2. Check how reliable the rental income is.
Yes, we acknowledge that there is vacancy risk. The vacancy rate actually tells you the fair probability that you can get your property rented. Be sure to find out the long term one.

3. Be sure to check if the rent yield is larger than Treasury bill's rate
This may sound technical. But it's important! Rent yield tells you how much return you're getting from your property. If it's less than T-Bill rate, why would you want to invest in this risky property in the first place when you can get more return risk-free?

4. Collect the most accurate rental and costs information
Accuracy depends on your dilligence. Garbage in, garbage out. Simple as that.

Fortunately, you don't need to crunch all that numbers by yourself. [LINK REMOVED] does most of the work for you, free of charge.

Next time you buy a property, remember, check your Rent-Implied Home Value.