Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Ralph Smith

Ralph Smith has started 1 posts and replied 3 times.

I would consider a heloc on the property in Fort Collins to get the down payment for a property in Loveland. If he puts the rental under a personal business having a mortgage there (business expense) is better than having a personal debt. 

It's already been said but both markets are hot, I'd favor Fort Collins because it's a larger city and from what I've seen, has higher rental prices.

Thanks for the geetings! 

I think I've got the math figured out now. In my case there was significant appreciation which I didn't show and wasn't thinking about with the example numbers I gave. 

That was key piece I was missing. Similar to having a having a higher value property after rehab (ARV) which would allow for a bigger loan just assuming 70% loan to value (LTV).

Just to add to my example. After appreciation the property is now valued at $130,000.

Now we refinance for 70% LTV ($90,000) and we receive a check for $30,000. Now I've got my initial $20,000 out plus $10,000 from equity.

Of course there's been payments over the two year period so it depends on the situation if that $10,000 is a plus or minus and we'd want to make sure the property is still cash flowing on that new loan, but I think I've got the "how" down now.

Cheers!

Hey y'all I just moved back to CO after spending 15 years in Austin, TX. Been on the FI road for a while and I'm looking to expand into real estate.

I've reading up. Can anybody help explain a scenario that seems related to the refinance piece involved in the BRRRR strategy. Specifically I'd like clarification on how you get your money out.

Let's say you have a property valued at $100,000. You acquired it with a conventional loan and 20% ($20,000) down. You've been making payments 2 years and you now owe only 60% ($60,000). 

So is it the case that you would attempt to refinance for 70% ($70,000) of that value meaning you would get a check for $10,000 that you could then use for future investments?

That's my understanding of how the math works, but in reality I still have my $20,000 in the house and I'm just pulling out the equity. Even if I used other people's money I could only pay back $10,000. 

Obviously the numbers are just made to make the math easy and this isn't exactly BRRRR case study, but I've ran across this situation a couple of times and I'm just wondering if there's a way to get you money out in this scenario. It seem like it would be similar to leveraging against existing properties, but I'm not seeing the real benefit. Unless you have a ton of equity and you just want a low interest loan.