Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Dan H.:
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Dan H.:
Quote from @Account Closed:
....Maximizing profit is exactly what the Realtors.... ...have done in a rampant fashion.... ...thats the root of the problem you speak of.
Help me to understand this, I narrowed it to just the 1, for simplicity sake.
So your saying the whole housing problem, it's agent's, agent's who represent sellers and buyer's who some way some how have created the issues at hand.
How? And vs what?
An agent, representing a seller, YES 100% the job is to work for the BEST outcome of the seller, full-stop. Getting top dollar buyers will pay with best term's buyers will give. That is the job, literally and legally.
The listing agent has 0 control what buyers will or won't do, 0. So how is it the agent's "fault"? What else are they to do? Tell a seller "nope, sorry, I won't let you sell for that much, it's not affordable enough, your going to take $50k less and LIKE IT"?
AND, on opposite side, an agent acting for buyer's IS the counter-weight. Doing everything possible to get BUYERS there best deal, lowest price, best terms. So how in the hell is a buyers agent at fault of unaffordability? There fighting to make things MORE affordable.
It's a bizarre argument that only makes sense if picture it falling out the mouth of a rampant COMMUNIST who has zero knowledge or experience of and with real estate agent's.
Is that the case here? Are you a communist just pist over any/all things "Capitalist scum"?
Because I, as an agent, and EVERY agent I know, would LOVE a WAY more "affordable" market. We make the most on VOLUME. A $50k difference doesn't mean much more $ for us, our motive is VOLUME. And a better, more affordable market, means way more volume and that directly translates into more $ for the agent.
So you couldn't be more wrong, agent's WANT a more affordable market. We want it zinging along for EVERYONE. Agent's motive is affordability not stagflation.
As soon as you used the word communist, you told me everything I need to know about you.
"An agent, representing a seller, YES 100% the job is to work for the BEST outcome of the seller, full-stop. Getting top dollar buyers will pay with best term's buyers will give."
Yep. Agreed, thats what you'll do alright. Brewing up bidding wars, highest and best, ect.
"AND, on opposite side, an agent acting for buyer's IS the counter-weight. Doing everything possible to get BUYERS there best deal, lowest price, best terms."
You know better than that, and so do we. I just dropped my douchebag agent who was more focused on her 2.5% than my interests as a buyer, as of last week. The inspection came back looking like **** and she fought tooth and nail to pursuade me to stay in the deal and not pull out or ask for the credits.
So while you Realtors are motivated by commissions on both sides, with plenty of lenders you can refer your clients to to help them overpay, while you take advantage of their own greed/ignorance/desperation, and a government and central bank facilitating the whole thing for you over the last decade-
ya right, Reators had no hand in the surge of home prices vs wages across the country.