All Forum Posts by: Pavan K.
Pavan K. has started 13 posts and replied 46 times.
Post: Bigger Pockets Tax and Financial pro finder

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Would like to know from users who have had success in using Bigger Pockets tax and Financial Service Finder based on your zipcode . I have been on this forum only for an year to get advice on rental investments . I had to end my relation with my current CPA and tax pro and looking for new Professionals. Lost on how to find the right one for the start. Should i go by the number of reviews of google or a larger firm ? Looking for advice on how would you start in the first place. Thanks for reading and your guidance.
Post: CPA says no to Depreciation

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Quote from @Matthew Young:
Good Morning Pavan, hope you are well. I have been a practicing CPA for a little over a decade, focused primarily in the real estate industry. There's a lot of great comments on this thread here from other investors, but a few points of clarification I would ask:
1. Was the property available and marketed for rent during the calendar year 2024? This matters as it helps determine the "placed in service" date. As an example, if you bought the property but put some work/time/money into it to get it before putting it up for rent, the time prior to it being listed for rent would not be eligible for depreciation. It would have just been held as an investment like you would hold a publicly traded stock. Based on your most recent response, it sounds like you had it available for rent in 2024 so my advice would be that it should have been placed in service on your 2024 return.
2. Based on your comments, it sounds like your income is likely to high to deduct the loss in 2024 so it may not have had a benefit to you on your 2024 return itself. I would argue though that not starting depreciation on it in 2024 is incorrect. As a few folks mentioned here, depreciation isn't optional so if it were to ever be looked at by the IRS, they would say you should have taken 3 months of depreciation in 2024 and even though you didn't, they would treat it as if you got those losses. Then, as also mentioned here once you sell the property you are subject to recapture on the lost depreciation, even though you got no benefit from it. Along with that, if you were to rent the property for enough gross rents that you have net income on paper before the depreciation, any built up losses in prior years can be used to offset income in a current/future year i.e. if you had depreciation in 2024, didn't use it and then carried it to 2025 where you had net income, that "carried forward" loss would reduce your taxable income in 2025. It would eventually get "recaptured" if you sold, but you get the benefit in the present with the downside being at a future date.
Overall, I agree with the sentiment of this thread and would say that depreciation really should have been taken on your 2024 return, and if it were me my next step would be to file the Form 3115 in 2025 and pick up the "lost" depreciation from 2024 so at 12/31/2025, you're back to where you should have been.
Feel free to shoot me a direct message if there's anything I can help clarify, happy to help.
- Matt
Yes, the property was in service( listed for rent as soon as the property was handed over in October 2024). The property got rented only in Feb 2025 (we have harsh winters ,and no one really moves).
i spoke to the Tax guy and asked about the depreciation. He mentioned, since I didn't have any positive rent in 2024 ,wouldn't have affected my tax . Hence he will be taking the depreciation in 2025.
i had few rental expenses in 2024,like appliances ,blinds etc(little over $10k, it will be carry forwarded to 2025)
Not sure if that's how it works, wanted to see what the pro's do.
Post: CPA says no to Depreciation

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Update: Since I did not have a rental income in 2024" .Depreciation wouldn't have made an impact on the overall tax situation.For the year 2025 , standard depreciation will be applied from 2025 onwards is what I'm told.
*property was purchased in October but got rented in 2025 only, though property was in service( available for rent since October 2024).
Post: CPA says no to Depreciation

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Quote from @Ashish Acharya:
@Pavan K. Depreciation isn’t optional, it’s required by the IRS, and not claiming it means you pay more tax now while still facing depreciation recapture (up to 25%) when you sell, even if you never took the deduction. On a $600K property, you’re likely missing out on $18K+ in annual deductions, which could save you $6K+ per year in your 32–35% tax bracket. You should ask your CPA why they advised against it, whether they’re aware of IRS recapture rules, and how they justify not using depreciation to offset rental income. Also ask if you can file Form 3115 to begin depreciating this year and catch up missed deductions. If their reasoning doesn’t hold up, it may be time to reconsider your CPA.
This post does not create a CPA-Client relationship. The information contained in this post is not to be relied upon. Readers should seek professional advice.
Post: CPA says no to Depreciation

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Hey Experts! Would love your inputs on this one.
Every blog/article I read regarding rental property advices to use depreciation for the rental property. Last year I bought a single family home as an investment property ($600k ~) . I hired a CPA suggested by my advisor and asked about depreciation during my tax filing session and to my surprise CPA advised against depreciation and doesn't recommend it. I wasn't expecting this and didn't have any questions to ask as to why not.
Now that the tax season is over and have all the time in the world to explore on the depreciation , what questions should I ask my CPA . Im fluctuating between 32-35% tax bracket if that helps .
Post: When does it make sense to do a Cost Segregation?

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Quote from @Natalie Kolodij:
Several notes:
1. $50k land value on a $600k property sounds very low / possibly incorrect
2. That price for a cost segregation study is on the high end for a single family home
3. "I would need to get a cost segregation study done in the first place" Need to get it done for what?
4. Without a cost segregation you depreciation the building value of your property across 27.5 or 39 years. It's not required in any way.
With a cost segregation study your building value will be broken out into many detailed components which will have lives of 5,7,15 and 27.5/39 year lives instead. Allowing you to accelerate some of the depreciation. (and utilize bonus depreciation on the assets with lives of 20 years or less)
5. Possibly most important: can you utilize any losses generated by the rental property? Or will you be subject to the passive loss limits?
Without a specific use for losses generated; utilizing a cost segregation study to generate large losses you can't use won't benefit you.
- Are you or your spouse an IRS real estate professional?
- Is this a Short-term rental?
- Do you have other passive income sources?
-Is your Adjusted gross income under $100k which would allow you to use some amount of passive losses?
1. $50k land value on a $600k property sounds very low / possibly incorrect. "
"This is a new suburb,mostly farmlands ,converted to residential zone . I did check county records for the land value."
2. That price for a cost segregation study is on the high end for a single family home.
" Noted. I'll shop around,when its time "
3. "I would need to get a cost segregation study done in the first place" Need to get it done for what?"
" I might have understood it incorrectly. The study needs to done for tax filing purposes?"
Unfortunately, we don't qualify for RE professional and this is a long term rental. Was hoping to find if cost segregation could offset or reduce tax liabilities on W2 income , which looks like it won't unless we are RE pros or it's a short term rental. Kind of in the higher tax bracket and finding ways to reduce our tax burden .
Post: When does it make sense to do a Cost Segregation?

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
I'm new to investment and rental properties. This will be my first year filing taxes which will include 1 rental property.
i do my own taxes since it's straight forward with one W2 and now a investment property.
Would like to understand if a cost segregation is necessary in my case.
Single Family home ,Property value $600k ( rounding off for easier calculations) land value $50k . Property was in service( for rent ) since October 2024 but was vacant until Jan 2025.
i reached out to a CPA and was told I need to get a cost segregation study done in the first place which would cost around $5000 and also told it's not mandatory to get it done. But all the articles I read , says it's best to use cost segregation(which will eventually be recaptured when sold or do a 1031) Given it's vacant for 3 months in 2024 . Do I really to get a cost segregation done ?
Thanks much
Post: House not rented for 100+ days

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Quote from @Adam Bartomeo:
Quote from @Pavan K.:
Quote from @Adam Bartomeo:
Why would you ever consider taking a listing down when it’s not renting? You are losing thousands of dollars a month in potential rents and actual expenses. Vacancy is the biggest killer of profitable rentals.You’ll never be able to get it rented if it’s not listed. It is better to lower the price and shift the lease ending date late spring.
Umm!! Not sure what you meant. The listing is down because it's rented. I have got the security deposit as well .
The latest comments have the updates . Thank you for your inputs though.
Post: House not rented for 100+ days

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Quote from @Adam Bartomeo:
Why would you ever consider taking a listing down when it’s not renting? You are losing thousands of dollars a month in potential rents and actual expenses. Vacancy is the biggest killer of profitable rentals.You’ll never be able to get it rented if it’s not listed. It is better to lower the price and shift the lease ending date late spring.
Umm!! Not sure what you meant. The listing is down because it's rented. I have got the security deposit as well .
Post: House not rented for 100+ days

- New to Real Estate
- Posts 47
- Votes 26
Thank you for all your inputs. This is a large single family new construction house(3000sqft+ 1200sqft basement unfinished).
I was able to rent it out from next month. I would blame it on the season , winter is brutal here and no one would be willing to make a move. As the season gets better , there is more interest.