All Forum Categories
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
All Forum Posts by: Rafael Ro
Rafael Ro has started 5 posts and replied 34 times.
Post: What are some realistic tenancy terms and maintenance costs (turnkey)?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Thank you so much both of you!
I think there is a weird balance here, among professionals, where people may not want to bad mouth fellow professionals, particularly from the same areas, which can create a skewed picture.
Specifically here, I've considered a few of the things that you both brought up, but the word "average" has a very specific meaning... It's one thing to say that "a typical tenant would likely stay for X years" and another to say that "on average, across our properties and thousands of leases, we see that tenants stay X years" -- the first one is a bit of an assumption and the second one is a stated fact.
If we take that fact for granted -- that, for example, the average tenancy is 6 years -- then that means that some tenants stay 1 year and others stay 10 years, but when you're running numbers for a property as such then the realistic scenario is that you won't have any vacancies or turnover costs for about 6 years. To me - that sounds outrageously optimistic, rather than realistic.
Would you agree? In general, for a B or B- class neighborhood.. of course there are exceptions here.
Same question for the 3.8 years for the C class neighborhood.. if you're running numbers, would you think that "realistically" your tenants will stay for 3.8 years?
None of the turnkey companies I've talked to offer any type of tenancy guarantee (outside of guaranteeing that they'll re-tenant the unit within a couple of months) -- if you know any that offer guarantees of tenancy that would sound very interesting! I don't see how they could, since things happen... but again, granted there is no guarantee, these companies are claiming such high averages and they have such huge portfolios and good reputations, so it makes me wonder. Maybe I'm crazy.
Post: What are some realistic tenancy terms and maintenance costs (turnkey)?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Hello all,
I'm trying to analyze deals by plugging in the numbers into a spreadsheet, but I'm struggling to figure out what numbers to use for vacancy and maintenance?
Specifically, some of the deals I'm considering come from established turnkey companies (very reputable in these forums) that have been around for a long time and they claim very long tenancy terms.
One of them is claiming an average of 3.8 years (they deal in C class neighborhoods), and the other one is claiming 6 years or more (B- class neighborhoods). They're saying that's "average".
Furthermore, since these are turnkey companies and praise themselves on their renovations, the B class turnkey is using only 2% of rent (which averages around $1500/pm) for maintenance, and the C Class turnkey is using 7.5% of rent (avg about $1000/pm) in their calculations. They argue that the first few years maintenance would be insignificant since the properties are renovated, and so you're essentially stashing that money away for the future maintenance needs.
Do these numbers sound at all realistic?
Obviously every market is different, but what have you seen in your experience? Consider that a few big expenses (ie. roofs, HVACs, etc) are often taken care of for a little while, since they are replaced as part of the reno in a few of these example properties.
Thank you all in advance!
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Drew Sygit:
@Rafael Ro some great advice already here!
IF you decide to move forward in Memphis, recommend buying the first one turnkey to get you going.
You'll learn a lot about rentals and the market with the first one.
THEN, if you like results you can look for agents & PMCs to help you buy more and save the 20-30% markup you mentioned.
Recommend you also read below info to set your expectations correctly:
_________________________________________________________________________
We think the Midwest is a GREAT place for OOS investors to consider!
Check out some of things happening in Detroit in 2024:
https://michiganchronicle.com/2024/01/03/major-developments-that-will-define-detroit-in-2024/
Your first question shouldn't be WHERE to invest (that is #2 question), but HOW you will invest!
Many OOS investors set themselves up for failure because they don't invest the time to ACTUALLY understand:
1) The Class of the NEIGHBORHOOD they are buying in - which is relative to the overall area.
2) The Class of the PROPERTY they are buying - which is relative to the overall area.
3) The Class of the TENANT POOL the Neighborhood & Property will attract - which is relative to the overall area.
4) The Class of the CONTRACTORS that will work on their Property, given the Neighborhood location - which is relative to the overall area.
5) The Class of the PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANIES (PMC) that will manage their Property, given the Neighborhood location and the Tenants it will attract - which is relative to the overall area.
6) That a Class X NEIGHBORHOOD will have mostly Class X PROPERTIES, which will only attract Class X TENANTS, CONTRACTORS AND PMCs and deliver Class X RESULTS.
7) That OOS property Class rankings are often different than the Class ranking of the local market they live.
Class A is relatively easy to manage, can even be DIY remote managed from another state. Can usually allot 5-10% vacancy factor and same for maintenance.
Class B usually also okay, but needs more attention from owner and/or PMC. Vacancy and maintenance factors should be higher than for Class A as homes will be older, have more deferred maintenance and tenants will be harder on them.
Class C can be relatively successful with a great PMC (do NOT hire the cheapest!), but very difficult to DIY remote manage. Vacancy and maintenance factors should be higher than for Class A or B. Homes will have even more deferred maintenance and tenants will be even harder on them.
Class D pretty much requires an OWNER to be on location and at the property 3-4 times/week. Most quality PMCs will not manage these properties as they understand most owners won’t pay them enough for the time required and even then it’s too difficult successfully manage them.
***Only exception is if an owner has plan & funds to reposition Class D to Class C or higher.
Let us know if we can help in any other way.😊
This is very helpful - thank you.
It is also what I am starting to realize.
Class C and D areas/properties will always cash flow better on paper, but on paper things like extra repairs, turnover, evictions and such are often not taken into account.
I am leaning towards Class B. Not the nicest areas, but nice enough.. and I would be looking for minimal cashflow, banking on appreciation.
The reason is that I'm looking at this as a long term investment where my goal is to grow my money with minimal headaches (even if that means slower growth).
With that in mind, maybe Memphis is not the place to invest. Would you agree?
The Midwest is probably your best bet for a number of reasons. Home prices are one, cost of living and relatively disaster-free weather keeps insurance costs down.
You can look up the median home price for every city or metro area. Class A and B neighborhoods are above median price and C and D are below. It's tough to cash flow in a B neighborhood when you are only putting 25% down and paying a PM.
My strategy as an investor has changed over the years, today I look at real estate more like a collection of properties and less through the cash flow lens. My main question is will I be happy in 10 years that I bought this property? I also never had to worry about vacancies: if you own a desirable property, you will always have people lined up to rent from you. The same is true if you would want to sell it at some point. This can not be said about many 100k properties.
Turnkey providers made sense IMO back in 2010-2015 when it was easy to find deals, but hard to get funding, so you'd sell the ones you could not get funding for. Today you can get funding for a good deal without an issue, so the business model is kind of obsolete.
I used to buy BRRRR deals, but over the last years, we switched to buying homes that are in move-in ready condition. We still end up doing a few things like upgrading appliances or installing recessed LED lighting and dimmer switches and other life-style upgrades to attract top-notch tenants. Milwaukee inventory has just been so low, that even very distressed properties sell to first-time home buyers without a significant discount, so in the end it's cheaper for me to buy properties that already have a new roof, windows, kitchen, HVAC etc
I appreciate that insight and it makes perfect sense.
As I wrote in another reply too - one more benefit for me is that in a way it's "forced savings" - I have to find a way to pay the bill... But also (for the most part) the money goes back to me.
I think buying attractive, move in ready properties and possibly making small updates to make them look more stylish is the way to go. Less sensitive about the price too, because the goal is to hold for a long time..
In your experience, do you find that it's possible to cashflow or at least break even with these properties and today's prices/rates?
Yes, my banks require a 1.2 DSCR debt service coverage ratio, meaning they want to see rent 20% higher than the mortgage payment. If you finance conventionally you don't have that limitation, but you can set your own goal. You can buy a 250k property with 25% down and pay about $1600 in PITI, or 350k / $2100. That's my typical price range for Milwaukee suburbs and both will break even at 20% down, slightly positive at 25% and I usually end up with 30% down to get to the 1.2 DSCR. But that's without paying a PM.
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @Chris Seveney:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Hello all,
I would really appreciate your insights here.
I live in CA and have a family with 2 kids - we're not moving anywhere. Have about 50k I would invest (access to more), with excellent credit and good income too, from my full time job. I'm the sole breadwinner.
I tend to overanalyze things, often leading to inaction, mainly because I have a somewhat pessimistic outlook on the economy and I'm trying to avoid getting overexposed.
Realistically, BRRR or wholesaling or other ideas that require a bigger time investment are not good for me - I run my business so I don't have much time left.
With that in mind, my first idea was to buy a condo or a house in my local area (Palm Springs, CA) and use it as a long term rental.
The issue there is the current prices and CA laws - for the past year I've been struggling to find a property that's somewhat turnkey and that would at least break even... And CA is extremely tenant friendly so it's not a great place for a rental.
That's why I started looking out of state. I found a good turnkey property company out in Memphis. Everything about them seems to check out, and their properties (which they sell already tenanted, and they manage) seem to break even with 25% down. They claim a small cash flow, and while that looks too optimistic, I believe that they can at least break even, so the tenants would be paying it off which is great.
Another cool thing about that is that most their properties are in the low 100s, which means that I can buy 2 of them, and then buy another every time I can gather 25k more. It's scalable. And they sell lots of them.
My issue with them is that from a quick look it looks like they're selling everything at a 20-30% premium (which I understand and respect). At the same time, I can't help but think that if I could get connected with a great agent and property manager, then I could do the same and save a great deal of money.
Then again this would also mean that I'd need to build a small team, and I'd need everyone to perform whereas they're bringing it all in one.
Another big thing here is the risk - as I said above I have a fairly pessimistic view about the economy in the next couple of years.. If I own a property with a 1k mortgage per month and it stays empty (or I'm trying to evict) for a couple of months then I'll be ok. But if the mortgage is 2k or 3k then I'll be in a tough spot.
I would love to make a move before the end of the year and so I keep trying to decide which of the following is best for me:
1) Buy 1 more expensive CA property near here, and thus a better tenant (less likely to cause issues), but lose a little bit of money every month due to the current numbers, while hoping for future appreciation?
2) Buy a few out of state properties over the next few years, through a well vetted turnkey provider like the one I mentioned above, which should more or less break even or give me a little bit of cash flow, and since I'd end up with a few doors my risk would be a little more spread out?
3) Buy a few out of state properties directly through an agent and work with a property manager to manage them?
4) Keep my money in a guaranteed savings account making 4.5%, until rates drop more or something changes, and the numbers are better to make a move?
Thank you in advance to everyone who read this, and moreso to those who respond with their thoughts.
There is no such thing as a "safe and stable" investment in real estate if you are going to be active or passive. you can buy the best property in the best area and have a tenant destroy the place or have it mismanaged that can cost you.
Check out the syndication group on how many people were promised "safe" or guaranteed returns and lost little money to everything. From turnkey rentals to syndication - real estate has significant risk and the more leverage you use the more amplified that risk
I was expecting to hear more things about Section 8.. or other types of investments that may provide some more stability.
However, ultimately what I'm looking for is a better understanding of the type of real estate investment that would fit my risk threshold.. and this thread is helping me figure that out.
I started by thinking that the cheapest areas/properties may be the way to go.. because they are cheap (so worst case scenario I can foot the bill for a little while) and they can potentially cash flow. I'm now thinking that better areas/properties make more sense because they'd likely appreciate faster (which amplifies the return) and attract better/more stable tenants.
Would you agree with this blanket assessment?
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @Ashish Acharya:
@Rafael Ro Option 2 (turnkey out-of-state properties) suits your situation, balancing time constraints, risk tolerance, and scalability. A vetted turnkey provider offers a hands-off approach, with properties likely to break even or generate modest cash flow, spreading risk across multiple doors. Start with one property to gain confidence before scaling. If willing to invest more effort for higher ROI, consider Option 3 (building your own team), though it requires time to establish reliable management. Retain a cash reserve to cover vacancies or downturns, and align with your long-term goals by consulting a financial advisor. This approach mitigates risk while leveraging your resources effectively.
Looks like your household could qualify as REPS and really offset your taxes if your portfolio is optimized.
This post does not create a CPA-Client relationship. The information contained in this post is not to be relied upon. Readers should seek professional advice.
Hello Ashish,
Would love to connect and discuss a little more about the potential tax aspects of all this. Would you be able to help if we're in different states (I'm in CA)?
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @Chris Clothier:
Quote from @Nicholas L.:
I think we need to help OP distinguish between "cash flow" and "a good investment."
As you have pointed out in other threads, paper cash flow on old midwest properties is illusory. But everyone in this thread keeps saying cash flow over and over.
To summarize:
-Old/older midwest properties in good neighborhoods that you will hold for 25+ years: good investments
-Cash flow on such properties: non-existent for the first 5-10-15 years
Yes?!
I am joking with this comment, but I was going to ask if you were new to Biggerpockets with your cash flow comment. It is pushed over and over and over, especially on social channels and from service providers, and often interchanged with other terms and defined differently constantly, but mentioned again and again. To the point where a new investor can be forgiven for not knowing there is any other reason to invest in real estate. It's super frustrating when you work with investors every day, and the common refrain is I want to buy a passive turnkey property, but it must cash flow. No discussion about why. There is no consideration for risks, areas, quality of the house, renovation, or management. Just make sure it cashflows on paper according to how I read in some thread to run my numbers!
End of rant - continue!
When I bought my house and after extensive research in the areas I was focusing on, I realized that unlike most other markets, real estate is much more "accurate". If I'm looking for a used phone then chances are that I'll be able to find a listing that's a great deal (substantially below market rate) after some time.. but with houses that wasn't the case. Even those priced low would just get a ton of bids and land on a market price.
I think that's true of investment properties too.. the worse the area (which of course comes with riskier tenants, more maintenance, and vacancies) the better the numbers look in theory in terms of "cash flow"... But in practice most of these numbers are likely not taking into account turnovers and repairs. I understand that.
The question is - would you say that it's pointless to look for better properties (ie. Class A or B) that have potential to cash flow or at least break even? Are they non existent or could certain agents with access to deals or that understand their local market better be able to find them?
For example, an agent in my area came to me with a deal for a house that looked overpriced... But then she explained that it's on a certain land that allows it to be used as a short term rental and that due to its location between within 2 months of the year (when huge events take place, every year) it would make enough to cover its mortgage for the year. I would have missed that, and many others would too. Could a good agent get you a better property with some "cash flow" potential?
I'm using quotes mainly because I don't necessarily mean cash flow per se. I'll have to pay the bills while looking for a tenant, I'll have to pay for repairs and all sorts of other things... If a property can come close to breaking even then it's essentially "cash flowing" in my book.
But if I buy a property where the numbers pencil out negative, before any unforeseen issues, then in my current financial situation I feel like I'd be overexposing myself. That same property could be a huge winner due to appreciation in the next 10 or 15 years... But I don't think I would want to bet that much on appreciation.. Ideally I'm hoping for a more balanced opportunity. Less potential appreciation, but better numbers so that if things go smoothly then I'd be breaking even, if not slightly positive.
Then again maybe that doesn't exist... Do you think it doesn't?
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @James Wachob:
Hello @Rafael Ro,
Thanks for sharing your situation—it's really helpful to understand where you're coming from. I can definitely see why you're cautious, especially with the real estate landscape in California and concerns about the economy.
When it comes to Memphis, I think it’s a great option for your out-of-state investment. The city offers affordable property prices, which can provide solid cash flow potential compared to the high prices in California. Homes in the low $100k range are pretty common, and that’s an attractive price point for real estate investors, especially when you’re looking for properties that can break even or provide positive cash flow. With your $50k to invest (and access to more), you could quickly scale your portfolio without stretching yourself too thin financially.
Memphis also has a steady rental market, which is driven by factors like population growth, job opportunities, and a strong economy. The demand for rentals remains strong, and with tenant-occupied properties, the risk of vacancies is relatively low. You’re looking at a market where cash flow is more predictable, and that's something you can count on in the long run.
Another reason Memphis is popular with out-of-state investors is the city's history of solid returns. Many people choose Memphis because the market offers a good balance of cash flow and long-term appreciation. It’s a market with low risk and high potential, which makes it an attractive option for those looking to diversify outside of expensive markets like California.
Regarding turnkey properties, it sounds like you’ve already found a good provider. The advantage of buying through a turnkey company is that they’ve done most of the work for you—finding the property, getting tenants in place, and handling property management. This can be a great option if you don’t have the time or desire to deal with the day-to-day operations of managing a property. Sure, the premium they add (20-30%) is something to consider, but you’re paying for the convenience of having everything handled. Plus, if you want to scale quickly, turnkey providers make it easier to buy multiple properties without worrying about finding each one individually.
If you’re feeling comfortable with taking on a little more responsibility, you could also buy directly through an agent and work with a property manager to handle everything. That route might save you some money, but it would require a bit more of your time to find the right team and manage the process. Luckily, Memphis has a strong network of real estate professionals who are used to working with out-of-state investors, so you'd have plenty of support.
In terms of risk, I think buying in Memphis is a good way to manage that. The more affordable price points, combined with a steady rental market, provide some peace of mind. If you buy multiple properties, you can spread out your risk and avoid putting too much pressure on a single investment. Even with potential vacancies or slow periods, the demand for rentals should keep things stable enough to cover expenses.
Ultimately, I think Memphis is a great place for your real estate investments. You can grow your portfolio, maintain manageable risks, and still see some solid returns. Whether you go with a turnkey provider or build your own team, I’m confident it’s a solid market that will work well for your goals.
Please reach out to me if you'd like to learn more about our city.
Do you think Memphis has Class B (or B+ or A) properties that could realistically cash flow or break even with today's prices and rates?
My understanding is that the properties in the low 100s are more in Class C areas, where realistically the tenants are not going to be great. Is that fair to say?
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @Allie McAlister:
Hi, Rafael.
I've worked with many investors who began their journeys with turnkey providers. As a first time out-of-state investor, I completely understand how the upside looks on paper when it comes to working with these companies. It's easy- often the properties are already rented and managed, and you can be arms reach away from the property while someone else takes care of it.
However, it's not uncommon for these providers to charge a 20-30% property premium, considering the services they provide. You may be willing to pay that extra percentage off of the top, but at the end of the day, you do not have to go through a turnkey provider to find a rent-ready ( and oftentimes, already tenant-occupied ) property, and a good property management team to manage the property for you.
My advice to you would be to find and develop a relationship with a knowledgable realtor in the market(s) you're taking a look into. They'll be able to find you turnkey deals in the open market, and help you stay in those A and B class neighborhoods it seems that you're looking for. And, if you're working with an investment-focused Realtor, they'll most likely be looking to keep you as a long-time client and not just sell you an "ok" house to make a quick commission off of you.
If you're seriously considering Memphis as a market you'd be interested in, I'd be happy to connect with you and discuss the turnkey options I see in this market, and see if those could be a good fit for you. I also have connections with a couple of great property management teams that would alleviate that out-of-state management anxiety.
Hello Allie,
This all sounds in line with what I'm looking for.
2 questions for you.
1) Does Memphis have Class A or B properties that can (realistically) come close to cash flowing or break even, with a property management company running them?
2) As someone that's out of state, how would you recommend that I vet a real estate agent? Everything would start from finding the right property - if I make the wrong decisions with that, then the rest can break down quickly. I need someone that has access to good deals, and a good knowledge of the rental market too, so they can identify an opportunity while others may miss it.
But on the flipside, the wrong agent can pretend to know, or think that they know all that... When they don't.. and may steer me the wrong direction.
Any insights?
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @Robert Ellis:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Hello all,
I would really appreciate your insights here.
I live in CA and have a family with 2 kids - we're not moving anywhere. Have about 50k I would invest (access to more), with excellent credit and good income too, from my full time job. I'm the sole breadwinner.
I tend to overanalyze things, often leading to inaction, mainly because I have a somewhat pessimistic outlook on the economy and I'm trying to avoid getting overexposed.
Realistically, BRRR or wholesaling or other ideas that require a bigger time investment are not good for me - I run my business so I don't have much time left.
With that in mind, my first idea was to buy a condo or a house in my local area (Palm Springs, CA) and use it as a long term rental.
The issue there is the current prices and CA laws - for the past year I've been struggling to find a property that's somewhat turnkey and that would at least break even... And CA is extremely tenant friendly so it's not a great place for a rental.
That's why I started looking out of state. I found a good turnkey property company out in Memphis. Everything about them seems to check out, and their properties (which they sell already tenanted, and they manage) seem to break even with 25% down. They claim a small cash flow, and while that looks too optimistic, I believe that they can at least break even, so the tenants would be paying it off which is great.
Another cool thing about that is that most their properties are in the low 100s, which means that I can buy 2 of them, and then buy another every time I can gather 25k more. It's scalable. And they sell lots of them.
My issue with them is that from a quick look it looks like they're selling everything at a 20-30% premium (which I understand and respect). At the same time, I can't help but think that if I could get connected with a great agent and property manager, then I could do the same and save a great deal of money.
Then again this would also mean that I'd need to build a small team, and I'd need everyone to perform whereas they're bringing it all in one.
Another big thing here is the risk - as I said above I have a fairly pessimistic view about the economy in the next couple of years.. If I own a property with a 1k mortgage per month and it stays empty (or I'm trying to evict) for a couple of months then I'll be ok. But if the mortgage is 2k or 3k then I'll be in a tough spot.
I would love to make a move before the end of the year and so I keep trying to decide which of the following is best for me:
1) Buy 1 more expensive CA property near here, and thus a better tenant (less likely to cause issues), but lose a little bit of money every month due to the current numbers, while hoping for future appreciation?
2) Buy a few out of state properties over the next few years, through a well vetted turnkey provider like the one I mentioned above, which should more or less break even or give me a little bit of cash flow, and since I'd end up with a few doors my risk would be a little more spread out?
3) Buy a few out of state properties directly through an agent and work with a property manager to manage them?
4) Keep my money in a guaranteed savings account making 4.5%, until rates drop more or something changes, and the numbers are better to make a move?
Thank you in advance to everyone who read this, and moreso to those who respond with their thoughts.
Investing in out-of-state properties can be a great strategy if approached thoughtfully. The key to success lies in ensuring you're entering the market at the right value. Whether you’re buying or building, focus on doing so below market value to secure immediate equity or strong cash flow potential.
It's also important to thoroughly research the local market—pay attention to trends like rent potential, job growth, and population increases. Partnering with local experts who understand zoning, permitting, and market nuances can help you avoid costly mistakes and maximize returns.
If you're in a high-cost area, out-of-state investing can provide access to markets with better entry points and higher ROI potential. Cities like Memphis and Columbus often have more affordable properties and good cash flow opportunities, making them popular choices for investors. Ultimately, it's about aligning your goals with the right strategy.
Makes sense. One concern that I have is that I need to be able to sustain this during a downturn. I'm thinking that the cheaper Memphis properties would end up empty if something were to happen... And then I'd have to foot the bill... Whereas tenants in nicer areas may end up sticking longer.
Post: Safe and stable investment: Do I buy rental properties or keep money in a HYSA?
- Posts 34
- Votes 10
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Drew Sygit:
@Rafael Ro some great advice already here!
IF you decide to move forward in Memphis, recommend buying the first one turnkey to get you going.
You'll learn a lot about rentals and the market with the first one.
THEN, if you like results you can look for agents & PMCs to help you buy more and save the 20-30% markup you mentioned.
Recommend you also read below info to set your expectations correctly:
_________________________________________________________________________
We think the Midwest is a GREAT place for OOS investors to consider!
Check out some of things happening in Detroit in 2024:
https://michiganchronicle.com/2024/01/03/major-developments-that-will-define-detroit-in-2024/
Your first question shouldn't be WHERE to invest (that is #2 question), but HOW you will invest!
Many OOS investors set themselves up for failure because they don't invest the time to ACTUALLY understand:
1) The Class of the NEIGHBORHOOD they are buying in - which is relative to the overall area.
2) The Class of the PROPERTY they are buying - which is relative to the overall area.
3) The Class of the TENANT POOL the Neighborhood & Property will attract - which is relative to the overall area.
4) The Class of the CONTRACTORS that will work on their Property, given the Neighborhood location - which is relative to the overall area.
5) The Class of the PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANIES (PMC) that will manage their Property, given the Neighborhood location and the Tenants it will attract - which is relative to the overall area.
6) That a Class X NEIGHBORHOOD will have mostly Class X PROPERTIES, which will only attract Class X TENANTS, CONTRACTORS AND PMCs and deliver Class X RESULTS.
7) That OOS property Class rankings are often different than the Class ranking of the local market they live.
Class A is relatively easy to manage, can even be DIY remote managed from another state. Can usually allot 5-10% vacancy factor and same for maintenance.
Class B usually also okay, but needs more attention from owner and/or PMC. Vacancy and maintenance factors should be higher than for Class A as homes will be older, have more deferred maintenance and tenants will be harder on them.
Class C can be relatively successful with a great PMC (do NOT hire the cheapest!), but very difficult to DIY remote manage. Vacancy and maintenance factors should be higher than for Class A or B. Homes will have even more deferred maintenance and tenants will be even harder on them.
Class D pretty much requires an OWNER to be on location and at the property 3-4 times/week. Most quality PMCs will not manage these properties as they understand most owners won’t pay them enough for the time required and even then it’s too difficult successfully manage them.
***Only exception is if an owner has plan & funds to reposition Class D to Class C or higher.
Let us know if we can help in any other way.😊
This is very helpful - thank you.
It is also what I am starting to realize.
Class C and D areas/properties will always cash flow better on paper, but on paper things like extra repairs, turnover, evictions and such are often not taken into account.
I am leaning towards Class B. Not the nicest areas, but nice enough.. and I would be looking for minimal cashflow, banking on appreciation.
The reason is that I'm looking at this as a long term investment where my goal is to grow my money with minimal headaches (even if that means slower growth).
With that in mind, maybe Memphis is not the place to invest. Would you agree?
The Midwest is probably your best bet for a number of reasons. Home prices are one, cost of living and relatively disaster-free weather keeps insurance costs down.
You can look up the median home price for every city or metro area. Class A and B neighborhoods are above median price and C and D are below. It's tough to cash flow in a B neighborhood when you are only putting 25% down and paying a PM.
My strategy as an investor has changed over the years, today I look at real estate more like a collection of properties and less through the cash flow lens. My main question is will I be happy in 10 years that I bought this property? I also never had to worry about vacancies: if you own a desirable property, you will always have people lined up to rent from you. The same is true if you would want to sell it at some point. This can not be said about many 100k properties.
Turnkey providers made sense IMO back in 2010-2015 when it was easy to find deals, but hard to get funding, so you'd sell the ones you could not get funding for. Today you can get funding for a good deal without an issue, so the business model is kind of obsolete.
I used to buy BRRRR deals, but over the last years, we switched to buying homes that are in move-in ready condition. We still end up doing a few things like upgrading appliances or installing recessed LED lighting and dimmer switches and other life-style upgrades to attract top-notch tenants. Milwaukee inventory has just been so low, that even very distressed properties sell to first-time home buyers without a significant discount, so in the end it's cheaper for me to buy properties that already have a new roof, windows, kitchen, HVAC etc
I appreciate that insight and it makes perfect sense.
As I wrote in another reply too - one more benefit for me is that in a way it's "forced savings" - I have to find a way to pay the bill... But also (for the most part) the money goes back to me.
I think buying attractive, move in ready properties and possibly making small updates to make them look more stylish is the way to go. Less sensitive about the price too, because the goal is to hold for a long time..
In your experience, do you find that it's possible to cashflow or at least break even with these properties and today's prices/rates?