Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Quentin Mitchell

Quentin Mitchell has started 37 posts and replied 193 times.

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Jim Jaworowicz:

I have 9 doors in C/C- neighborhoods.  Most are smaller 2 BR units.  They cost less to purchase (2 BR) and repair (smaller sq. ft).  There are generally 2 people living in them so there is less wear and tear.  I update them when I buy and in between tenants and keep them in good repair when a tenant is in them.  I am able to charge top dollar rents and require a 600+ fico score with no evictions in their past.  I have little problem filling the units and average about an 11 - 14% return after all expenses (including Cap Ex and financing).  I use a property Mgr so I can concentrating on Investing and my other job.  It works for me.  The bottom line - you can invest at any grade level with the proper procedures/safeguards in place.

 I agree Jim the local market and a person's procedures make a huge difference in the outcomes.

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Kenneth Mooney:

@Quentin Mitchell the LARGE majority of investments I do and see people do are Class C properties. Would highly recommend them for a variety of reasons but mainly that you can make good money if you know what you’re doing.

However, if you’re having to worry about “an endless supply of tenants” you should evaluate your market against others.

Agreed 

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Wendy Lavana:

@Quentin Mitchell

I own several class C multi families in Ft Lauderdale Fl. Best investments I ever made. Sometimes hard to manage, but over the course of 5 years I’ve leaned to ignore lots of the tenant nonsense and get important things done.

On point #5. I went in thinking I could help make the neighborhood better by making my properties better and over the years I’ve become disillusioned. You can only help people who will help themselves. My tenants in class C aren’t interested in caring for new improvements, they’ll most likely take something new and improved and destroy it. I’ve learned that my Class C units simply need to be livable, understanding this has made managing and maintaining them a lot easier and cheaper. Most of my tenants receive government assistance and would be happy to find a reason to sue me, even when they like me. I am diligent about repairs and respect my tenants and trust me they will work to find reasons to fault you, even make things up. Once you accept these facts, get yourself a few reliable handyman who are willing to work with your tenants and ignore the verbal abuse that you’ll soon realize has nothing to do with you personally, you’ll realize you have cash flowing properties that like every other class of properties have problems. I have class A properties that are less problematic but cash flow lots less. And as far as tenants go, well class A can come with its own interesting personalities. Personally I didn’t get into rentals because I assumed they would be “passive income,” I knew they would come with some work. It can get bad sometimes but it’s always better than working 9-5 for someone else. I couldn’t afford to purchase a bunch of class A rentals when I got in, it didn’t make sense. I think getting in at class C level made me tougher, thicken my skin a bit. They’ve also appreciated a lot more than class AIf I could purchase more class C right now, I would. Housing organizations call me everyday to see if I have any available units. Fully booked and looking for new rentals, but unfortunately everything is priced too high.

Fantastic I myself am a fan of C's because of then entry price and honestly the experience they provide. In regards to #5 I was saying it's a plus not the main objective.  You are right if people don't want to be helped you can't, but If you can make money and help those that do want help it's icing on the cake.

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Brent Crosby:

@Quentin Mitchell not sure I buy #2. Lots of these types of tenants work in the construction industry in my area. During the last recession many were out of work for quite some time.

There are exceptions but the lower level jobs are usually safer in downturns because they don't have the same affect on the bottom line as the higher paying jobs.

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Jill F.:

@Jay Hinrichs I enjoy your posts!

And you are sooo right. I would never call what I'lm doing right now passive. However, I do think (with well thought out business processes) that  I will be able to eventually (in the next 5 years) hire a w-2 property manager and be able to travel more extensively.

What many people don't get about older assets is that @ $70/ft it would have cost 190k to build a 4 unit that I bought for 67 with 10k of diy renovation costs. No one (without subsidies) is going to do that on a low $0 value lot. And the thing is, these buildings are built WELL. They have oak hardwood floors, 6" mop boards with pretty base cap, mahogany doors, 11 windows in each one bedroom apartment most of which are still in decent shape-- that old wood is HARD-- if the windows haven't been painted, we pull the stops, re-rope the windows and then use screws to replace the stops and call it a day. The old moncreif gravity furnaces have no moving parts, they'll probably last another 75 years.

The funny thing is I bought for cash flow, not expecting any appreciation but they have apprreciated anyway (about 25% in the last 3 years). Someone is building a snazzy new building with apartments over retail down the street because we are in one of those opportunity zones and they got the city to force the shutdown of the homeless tent city so perhaps things will get better even in the hood.

I guess am one of the weirdos that likes managing these units. These tenants are NOT whiners.

Jill,

Also you know you just have to play the hand your dealt.. if this is what it is in your market that's what you do. Our summer home in Oregon is in Portland metro.. the hand we are dealt here is you basically cant buy anything for under 200k lots are 100k to 500k.. MF sells for 3 to 5 cap .. so with that all said we have a very robust infill building and rehab market. literally every area of town you CAN build something new and make a profit.. So that's the hand we are dealt.. In Vegas which has bounced back STRONG price points are about the same I fund a flipper there and you pretty much cant find anything under 120 to 150k.. and the starter stuff for OO is 200 to 225k and sell within 30 days.

Vegas was a great place to buy in 2010.. values have risen by double or more..  Not that I did any buying here then.. I just want to live there for other reasons. 

 The strategy definitely makes a difference depending on where you invest, it's not a dramatically lower price point it may not make sense because the cash wouldn't be enough to justify. The point was it's an option that people can look at not the only option.

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Quentin Mitchell

I must’ve missed the mainly C part in a previous post. A genuine D class property will not have the building itself appreciate. The land maybe (or maybe not as you have identified), but not the building. You’re looking at a 50+ year old structure that’s already had deadbeats living in it for a couple decades at minimum and will be at least another decade (likely more) before the area is anything above a D. The same way as termites destroy a structure, so do hood rats. D class does not transition to B or higher in a 5 year window. Now, if you’re talking an already transitioning area (not D), maybe. Again, maybe not as you’ve identified. Further down the continuum you travel the more common tax depreciation techniques become accurate and eventually not even enough. Up here I’m allowed 4%/ year on a declining basis. D class tenants often do way more damage than 4% of asset value in a year. 4% can be a regular paycheck Friday for them.

Generally speaking D and C class the land has zero to negative value the day you buy and the day you sell it.. cities are littered with worthless lots.. when you can buy exiting inventory for far less than it cost to replace then the land has no value or negative value.

Just basic economics.. other than Texas and GA were I see production builders ( and OKC) building for about 70 bucks a foot or so. replacement costs from ground up are about 100 a foot and up.. Plus demo if any.  this is happening in areas that are regentrifying but those are very tight little specific niches of markets in each city.. and the money is made by flippers and new construction not buy and hold. 

This argument has been going on ever since I got on BP..  The folks that pop on here and talk about doing well at it are universally local and self manage and for them they like it or tolerate it .. but its not investing its a J O B to be successful at it.. I mean we see it all the time I want to buy and hold for passive income.. there Is nothing passive about running these types of assets.. 

Any class of real estate is about systems and developing your system it can be scale and any type of real state you need to work on nothing business is completely passive until it grows exponentially. 

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

...If you follow your market closely, you know exactly where gentrification will happen. Timelines can be affected by local policy makers as can areas so its never a “set it and forget it” type plan, continue to monitor closely.

Agreed

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Bob Daniels:

@Quentin Mitchell I believe he is talking about living expenses.  If you cashflow 5k/month from your rental properties, but your day to day living expenses total 5k/month (gas, food, clothing etc), then you are net neutral.  Years later you what you are left with is a bunch of beat up homes that are difficult to liquidate, and if you do sell them you now owe all that depreciation recapture. 

There was a thread just the other day about an investor who was stuck after numerous years with a bunch of low end units that he couldn't get rid of without taking a loss.

I get it but that was his example of cashflow more can be made from Class C as well is all I'm saying there are so many different strategies and ways to scale in this business and some people are better in area's than others so my point was for someone that may be needed to hear that this could be a possible option if they have the skill and are in a market where the numbers work in their favor.

Like I also mentioned before you never know where gentrification can happen but that is luck and in my opinion, any appreciation on SFH or small Multi-families is going to have a lucky component because of too many variables outside of your control. Now commercial can be a little more manipulated and then class B's are the clear better asset but again C is not bad either D is the least perferable I will definitely give you that.

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Quentin Mitchell

What I meant is, group a few doZen of them together that over a 5 year hold will cashflow $100 each monthly (round to $5,000) and then yes, you could use that to “live on”... but at the end of year 10 you’re left with an absolute garbage sfh that literally has zero value (physical buildings DEppreciate) and you’ve got some land value (land Appreciates)... so you may have paid $75k for both land and sfh to start, you ended up literally eating and paying for gas etc with all your “cashflow” and now in year 10 (or sooner for D class) you’ve got a knockdown little box, in the hood, beside 400 other little knockdown boxes...

Whereas buying in a B neighbourhood, the useful lifetime of the home if managed well will be (at minimum for a comparable asset) quadruple and you’re building genuine wealth instead of living paycheck to paycheck on monthly ”cashflow” from the hood rats.

You will never build genuine generational wealth on cashflow. You might live on it just fine, but that isn’t wealth any more than your day job paycheck is. By the time you’ve got our D class fully paid off it has nearly $0 value. Stuffing your kids stockings with the title to a $0 house likely isn’t your target

You're saying D I said C or D mainly C and I disagree that it will depreciate because one thing you're not taking into account is those D and C can become trendy areas and see appreciation is that 1000% but the long game of banking on appreciation to be is very risky but there are ton of factors that go into and most are out of your control. Now with that being said I am not opposed to B at all just saying C and D is an easier price point and experience booster to get someone started in real estate.

I also believe B's are good as well the post isn't to say one is better than another.

Post: My Case for C and D Properties!

Quentin MitchellPosted
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 197
  • Votes 105

@Thomas Sherlock Check out this thread