Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Puri Indah

Puri Indah has started 7 posts and replied 36 times.

Hello BP Nation,

I have a hypothetical question:

If you have $1M worth of property sale in San Francisco and you'd like to 1031 it out of State for an A class Multi-Unit(s), where would you buy and why? 

Thank you.

Post: 1031 Exchange in San Francisco City

Puri IndahPosted
  • Posts 36
  • Votes 11

I wasn't actually asking about the process itself, more if anyone has successfully done that knowing the challenge of buying (not selling). It is easy to sell a vacant unit in SF, but hard to find one of the same kind. Definitely challenging to do both at the same time. 

Did anyone ever do a 1031 Exchange in San Francisco? I'm thinking about doing this for a 3-unit (vacant) building for probably a duplex also vacant. Both should be in the same ballpark in terms of prices. Just not sure if it is possible or how complicated it could be.

Would appreciate info/advice.

Thank you!

Doesn't the buy disqualify you for the condo conversion?

Thanks for all the feedback, guys! We went ahead with the 30 years fixed.

@Joe Villeneuve: to answer your question: cashflow at $2,500/month with 30 years, or $3,000/month with interest only.

Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
Originally posted by @James Herbold:
Originally posted by @Puri Indah:
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

What does the cash flow look like with each of the two options

 $500/month more with interest only..

 I think he is trying to figure if the $1,565 is $10 cash flow or $500 cash flow. Would help with analysis?

With just the information you have given, I would say do the 30 year.  I agree with what @Sam Shueh, but also add that even if you can refi in 10 years you might not be able to get that rate?

 Correct.  I can see the $500 difference.  I'm wondering if the 30 year is cash flowing positive at all, and if the extra $500/month on the interest only loan means that deal would cash flow less than $500, more than $500, or just $500...per month.  With the info you've given us, all we know is the interest only loan cash flow $500/month better than the 30 year loan.

Yep, I should have clarified :) Also, income-wise we don't really need an additional $500 by risking not getting a refinance after 10 years. I just wanted to make sure that this is the right strategy, or what most of you would do as sometimes I'm clueless with these stuff :)

Originally posted by @James Herbold:
Originally posted by @Puri Indah:
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

What does the cash flow look like with each of the two options

 $500/month more with interest only..

 I think he is trying to figure if the $1,565 is $10 cash flow or $500 cash flow. Would help with analysis?

With just the information you have given, I would say do the 30 year.  I agree with what @Sam Shueh, but also add that even if you can refi in 10 years you might not be able to get that rate?

 Oops sorry. So cashflow at $2,500/month with 30 years, or $3,000/month with interest only.

Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

What does the cash flow look like with each of the two options

 $500/month more with interest only..

I have $340K left on my rental mortgage and I'm refinancing it now.

Got 2 options:

1). 30 years fixed at 3.70% or $1,565 monthly payment

OR

2). 10 years interest only at 3.65% or $1,030 monthly payment.

I have no W2, so refinancing after 10 years maybe a bit of a challenge.

What would you do?

Originally posted by @Tanya F.:

I think that the whole issue is a direct consequence of wages and salaries being too low for a significant portion of the population. Pay people a living wage and rent control is not necessary. 

 Not entirely true. Techies in SF (nothing against them) make tons of money, many cases much more than their moms and pops landlords. And still get rent control in their Apartments.