I am in California and use the standard CAR Commercial lease form and recently had a front window break. The tenant says they were not at the facility when it happened and it looks like it blew out not in. I, unfortunately don't know how that happened but do know that it also happened in the unit next door and they were at the facility when their window broke. They also said it broke from inside out. The lease says the tenant is responsible for the maintenance for the storefront windows, so that tenant is paying for the repair. My problem, the other tenant is an attorney and threw out the following:
As pursuant to the agreement on page 1 of 6, # 17, Maintenance:
“Tenant shall professionally maintain the Premises including heat, air conditioning, electrical, plumbing, and water systems, if any, and keep glass, windows, and doors in operable and safe condition….” Tenant’s contention is that Tenant maintained the Premises as directed. The windows and glass were in safe and operable condition as of April 30, 2014.
The dispute arises due to the “damage” incurred to the building during a recent bout of the Santa Ana Winds on May 1, 2014, which falls under the category of “other casualty.”Tenant refers to the Lease Agreement: page 3 of 6, #26, Damage to Premises, which states:
”If, by no fault of Tenant, Premises are totally or partially damaged or destroyed by fire, earthquake, accident, OR OTHER CASUALTY, Landlord shall have the right to restore the Premises by repair or rebuilding. If Landlord elects to repair or rebuild, and is unable to complete such restoration within 90 days from the date of damage, subject to terms of this paragraph, this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. If Landlord is unable to restore the Premises within this time, OR IF LANDLORD ELECTS NOT TO RESTORE, THEN EITHER LANDLORD OR TENANT MAY TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT BY GIVING THE OTHER WRITTEN NOTICE. RENT SHALL BE ABATED AS OF THE DATE OF THE DAMAGE. THE ABATED AMOUNT SHALL BE THE CURRENT MONTHLY BASE RENT PRORATED ON A 30-DAY BASIS….”
Clearly, the fault here does not lie with the Tenant, who was off-site during the damage, but with the structural design of the window frame/exterior walls. Tenant also notes that Tenant’s window was not the only window in Landlord’s complex to recently break for no apparent reason. Unless it is the Landlord’s stipulation that Landlord’s other tenants were somehow at fault for the breakage of their window, Landlord cannot find this Tenant at fault for the breakage, which occurred while Tenant was off-site.
When Tenant requested immediate board-up of the window in order to secure Premises, Landlord declined. When asked to fix the window, Landlord elected NOT TO RESTORE. At Tenant’s expense, Tenant removed the broken glass, and when Tenant attempted to stabilize the window, said glass broke on him, lacerating his arms. Tenant had to restore the window to keep Tenant’s property safe and because damage interfered with Tenant’s reasonable use of Premises, but Tenant does not agree that it was the Tenant’s responsibility to fix. Tenant asks for reimbursement in the amount of $692.57 for replacement of the glass. Tenant does not ask reimbursement for the wood and hardware purchased to make the wall whole until Tenant could have a professional glass repair company come and replace the window.
The compromise they are requesting, is for us to reimburse for the window and let them out of the lease 1 month early on July 31, 2014. If they vacate on that date, we will have received all the rent during the time they were actually there, we will only be out the cost of the window or to go to court and try to get August rent and the window and attorneys fees or loose our case? My tenant next door is interested and might take the space for half rent for August and full rent starting on September 1, 2014. Is there a real estate attorney out there that might know the answer?
I look forward to hearing from someone.
Thanks, Richard