Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joshua Woolls

Joshua Woolls has started 8 posts and replied 158 times.

Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
Originally posted by @Joshua Woolls:
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

@Joshua Woolls

  OK, I'll bite.  Where are you finding properties with $1000 cash flow with property manager in place and no cash left in in the property after you refinance?

 $1000 is before Tax/Ins. and we manage our own properties(for now). We also buy straight cash and have not leveraged at all yet and don't plan on it until we run low on cash (1-2 more houses). Based on your previous posts of where you like to invest, I imagine we are looking at about the same properties. 3/1 brick ranches in South Redford.

 Same deal...same numbers.  I don't do my own PM.  Why?  I also leverage them by refinancing my cash back out.  Why would I leave it in?  I'm losing money when I do.

 I was actually just talking with my wife about this tonight. We want to get a property manager when we get to 10 properties. 

We are also getting ready to leverage a little once we use up our cash. I doubt we will highly leverage though. Real estate(at least for now) is a hobby to give some extra income. If it becomes more than that we may become more aggressive. 

Post: Buying a tax lien foreclosure?

Joshua WoollsPosted
  • Investor
  • Grosse Pointe Park, MI
  • Posts 164
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @David Begley:
Originally posted by @Jerel Garner:

Hello All I am New to BP and Real Estate Investing. I am considering my first deal as a JV with a relative. Here is the situation:

My relative has been a tenant in this home for a year and a half with out any problems with the home such as plumbing, electrical, heating, etc. The thing is the property manager stop collecting rent about 5-6 months ago, and has disappeared off the face of the earth. In the mean time the current tenant (my relative), has been receiving letters, at the home, from the county stating that the home is going into foreclosure unless the back tax are paid/disputed by March 31, 2014. If the owner does not pay the taxes by the deadline we are considering paying the back taxes and taking ownership of the own.
the plan would be for my relative to stay in the home while we do some minor cosmetic updates and then flip the house or rent it out.

Oh yea one more thing the house is in Detroit.

Any comments/ suggestions would help? Thanks in advance!

 I can't speak of Michigan specific laws governing tax liens or tax sales, but you should consult a local expert on these matters because i do know it's not as simple as paying the back taxes and taking ownership. Generally, if Michigan is similar to Georgia,  the state or  local government will auction the tax lien competitively to the highest bidder (and those bids can approach the value of the property, not just the back taxes) and the previous owner will have a 1 to 2 year Redemption Period (states differ) to pay the back taxes and penalties and which time your attorney must make best efforts to contact the owner of record to ensure they have no intentions of paying the back taxes/penalties during the Redemption Period.  Then, if no one steps forward and the redemption period passes, your attorney then can start the judicial Quiet Title action, which could take another 6-9 months and $3,500-$6,000 in attorney fees and court costs.   Oh yeah, your relative/tenant may even have to vacate the premises during the 2 1/2 year Redemption/Quiet Title action since they may legally be trespassers until you gain title.  

Good luck in your endeavors.  

 Michigan is a tax deed state, not a tax lien state. That means that the winner of the auction actually takes possession of the property. There is no redemption period as far as I know.

Post: Buying a tax lien foreclosure?

Joshua WoollsPosted
  • Investor
  • Grosse Pointe Park, MI
  • Posts 164
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Jerel Garner:

Hello All I am New to BP and Real Estate Investing. I am considering my first deal as a JV with a relative. Here is the situation:

My relative has been a tenant in this home for a year and a half with out any problems with the home such as plumbing, electrical, heating, etc. The thing is the property manager stop collecting rent about 5-6 months ago, and has disappeared off the face of the earth. In the mean time the current tenant (my relative), has been receiving letters, at the home, from the county stating that the home is going into foreclosure unless the back tax are paid/disputed by March 31, 2014. If the owner does not pay the taxes by the deadline we are considering paying the back taxes and taking ownership of the own.
the plan would be for my relative to stay in the home while we do some minor cosmetic updates and then flip the house or rent it out.

Oh yea one more thing the house is in Detroit.

Any comments/ suggestions would help? Thanks in advance!

 Jerel, I have been doing quite a bit of research on the Wayne County Tax Auction. All states are different when it comes to how tax auctions work, so you need to make sure that the info you get is specific to Michigan. From what I understand, Michigan is a Tax Deed auction state, which means that once the property goes to auction, the winner actually receives a deed and takes possession of the property. There is no redemption period after that. All other liens are wiped off of the title(with the exception of some government/IRS liens).

Essentially, with some minor exceptions, the property would be owned free and clear by the winner of the auction, but in order to sell the property, if the buyer wanted to take a loan, you would need to have title insurance issued and the only way you could get title insurance would be to keep possession of the property or file a Quiet Title action, which can cost a $1500-$5000ish.

The bids at the auction start at whatever the back taxes that are owed. If it does not sell at the first wave of auction, it will go up at a second wave where the minimum bid is $500.

Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

@Joshua Woolls

  OK, I'll bite.  Where are you finding properties with $1000 cash flow with property manager in place and no cash left in in the property after you refinance?

 $1000 is before Tax/Ins. and we manage our own properties(for now). We also buy straight cash and have not leveraged at all yet and don't plan on it until we run low on cash (1-2 more houses). Based on your previous posts of where you like to invest, I imagine we are looking at about the same properties. 3/1 brick ranches in South Redford.

Originally posted by @Adam Hershman:
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

@Adam Hershman

Q:  Is the margin or difference between rent and mtg with 20% equity better versus rent and mtg with 40% equity, and if so, is it enough to account for the additional risk?
A:  Yes.  What additional risk?

Q:  I believe debt is supposed to be paid, unless there is no reasonable way to do so.
A:  So do I.  That statement wasn't meant to be thought of as a business plan.  It was simply made to point out that if both the all cash in investor, or mostly debt in investor lost the house...the one with his cash still in the deal is losing more.

Very important point missed...the speed of money.  When you need NEW cash for each property, it takes time to accumulate.  That is the measure of how long it takes to get the next property.  

In my case, when I refi, I get that same cash back to move on...within 6 months.  Therefore, my cash is working for me...I'm not working for my cash, so I can move much faster.

Assuming an $75,000 cost.  Same for both of us.  Same $100,000 ARV in 6 months:

1 - You and I both bring the $75k in cash, but it takes you 10 years to accumulate that same $75k again based on using either the cash flow from the first property...or, the original means you used to get the first $75k.  Me, it takes 6 months.

2 - This means that even though my cash flow may be half of yours on the first property, I can double the use of my original $75k and have two deals by the end of the year....so by years end, I caught up to you in Cash flow.

3 - Now, the next 4 years I add 2 more properties per year using the same "cash in/refi out" system.  You are still waiting to accumulate the funds for house #2, while I have 10 properties.  If each property was the same, I would have 5 times as much cash flow as you would...and I would not have spent a dime "out of pocket"...since at the end of the 10th refi, I get my original $75k back.

4 - It isn't that I don't think of the mortgage payment as paying for the house.  It's simply the difference of where the funds to make these payments are coming from.  My payments come from the rent...the tenants money, and over time.  Yours comes from out of pocket...and is your money...paid up front.  

5 - This also means that from a CoCR basis, I'm ahead from the time I refi.  You are behind until you catch up when your accumulated cash flow over the years ($7500/year) = the cash you spent upfront to buy ($75k)

This is all I care about, if you can charge $750/mo for a 75k house, i need to buy some houses where you are. If you could assume a 33% appreciation in 6 months on every property you buy, you should buy property in perpetuity with cash, credit, and when that runs our beg and borrow for more.

Even if you can get $750 for a $75k house, and the property value staying flat @ $75k, you would have a $287ish (60K cash out leaving 20% EQ @ 4.03% national average) mortgage on each, and you use the 50% rule its still only $88 positive cash flow per property. If you look at leaving 50% EQ in the property you end up with a $180 mortgage (37.5k down or cash out leaving 50% EQ @ 4.03%) use the 50% rule and positive cash flow $195 per property.

You would effectively be doing this 5 times over ($15k x 5 = $75k), where I would be doing it twice ($37.5k x 2 = $75k). You would have a positive cash flow of $440 monthly ($88 x 5), and I would have $390 monthly ($195 x 2). Granted that's not including any costs associated with purchasing the properties, where I would clearly have the advantage. This also leaves me with equity that can be tapped before hitting the 20% EQ line.

I guess to answer my own question, even if I could get $750 a month for a 75K house, I think I would rather have 2 houses cash flowing $390 and be $75K (2 loans for $37.5K each) in debt, than be $300K (5 loans for $60k each) in debt for an extra $50 a month. It doesn't make sense to me because in your scenario, I am effectively taking on $4,500 of debt for every $1 of additional cash flow over my scenario.

To put it another way you would incur an average of $681 in debt for every $1 of cash flow, my way incurs $193 of debt for every $1 of cash flow. 

Again I'm not a real estate pro, it just doesn't seem like the meager additional income is worth the considerable amount of debt liability, perhaps if the debt was non-recourse, I could see the benefit, but if you are personally liable for that debt, I don't think the numbers work for me.

Adam

I hate to say it, but I wouldn't even consider a house that paid only $750/mo for 75k. I expect at least $1000 for 60k. And I find these on the MLS relatively easily.

Post: How much do you have to spend to buy a rental property in your area?

Joshua WoollsPosted
  • Investor
  • Grosse Pointe Park, MI
  • Posts 164
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
Originally posted by @Ron S.:

@Joe Villeneuve

 What part of Redford? Is that in the South area? What kind of rehab costs are you needing to do on the homes your buying for 50k to have them rent ready?  I'm doing some research into Redford and it seems its very saturated with rental homes. Seems like you would need to have some better than average homes in that area to attract the better  tenants.  Are you able to keep long term tenants there with all the rental competition?  I picture a high turnover rate when tenants have so many homes to choose from.  And we know its costly to turn over homes.

 Not true.  Redford is a stable rental market.  It's the perfect storm.  You can get S Redford for the above including rehab, and even less in the north.  I pretty much have Redford locked in as far as the different micromarkets.  Call me if you want to discuss.

 I'm with Joe... I only have three (soon 4) properties in Redford, but it really is the perfect storm. Solid homes for great prices that rent to solid tenants for good rents... I buy at 55-60 and usually have less than 2K in updates/repairs when all is said and done. Rents for $950-1200.

I have looked all over the metro, and I can't find any other burb that does this for me. I am relatively new to the area though, so if someone knows something I don't, please let me know!

Post: Looking for House to Rent in Livonia, Farmington Hills, or Redford Michigan

Joshua WoollsPosted
  • Investor
  • Grosse Pointe Park, MI
  • Posts 164
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Tyler Larsen:

Thank you for the reply @George P. 

Ideally, I am looking for a place north of I-96. Fiancee works in Southfield and I work in Plymouth Township, so somewhere in between those locations as well.

Did you find something? I have a 1300 Sq ft in Redford that is available. $1100 a month. It is south of 96 though, which is the better area of Redford. 

Post: Losing my Proper(ginity): Is investing out of state for your first purchase too risky?

Joshua WoollsPosted
  • Investor
  • Grosse Pointe Park, MI
  • Posts 164
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Joshua Woolls those are great returns. Do you have a zip code or two to suggest as I have been contemplating a few states in your region for cash flow. 

 Oak Park, Redford, Dearborn Heights, Westland, Wyandotte, Allen Park. The good opportunities are less and less all the time, but they are still there if you look. There are some areas on the east side of the city that aren't too bad as well, but that is farther than I travel right now.

Post: Losing my Proper(ginity): Is investing out of state for your first purchase too risky?

Joshua WoollsPosted
  • Investor
  • Grosse Pointe Park, MI
  • Posts 164
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Brian P.:

I would always keep a toe in my own front yard but always open to other yards. If I lived in Detroit I wouldn't hesitate to invest out of state, and it would only be days before I left to check out of state properties never to return. 

San Diego is a great town, loved it, even opened a real estate office there in a prime spot by the Shadow Ridge Country Club area in Vista ( It was ground floor time) and another in a little one room setup in La Mesa, and lived near Bird Rock. Wanted to try the area called the worlds most perfect weather. Quickly released the spaces and moved back to the S.F.Bay Area because my wife was very very homesick. Still did a few Commercial deals and upscale homes there just after we had left to clear the leads off my desk. 

I still think there are deals there but they aren't likely to fall into your lap so keeping your toe in the water is good. Boise, I have a ton of relatives there that I never see and it is sort of stable but if your looking try looking at the Salt Lake City area if your going the buy and hold route. I have lived here now for several years after moving here to get a heart transplant, the only real drawback for me is the snow, I'm a sun and surf guy. 

For those of you that say the opportunities are are limited in SoCal I can tell you there is 500 million to be made in L.A.County right now and if I could get my wife to move there and find the right doctors I would be there tomorrow but I can't do it long distance. No partner offers please. The only people I would partner with on this kind of action are all dead, It is the old story the gods take the good people and leave the garbage. Maybe some one will figure it out but it has been hanging like a carrot in front of me for over ten years now. But I know there are some LA investors saying there isn't any fruit on the trees here, lets try somewhere else.

 Why would you invest out of state if you were in Detroit? Is it the terrible 15-20% returns? I just looked found a nice little rental in SLC for $895, and it's only 120k... I buy(nicer) houses for 55k and rent them for $1100 in the Detroit suburbs. 

Post: what are some recommended markets?

Joshua WoollsPosted
  • Investor
  • Grosse Pointe Park, MI
  • Posts 164
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Payman A.:
Originally posted by @Scott K.:

come to Detroit suburbs.  Its a thriving market

 Thanks Scott.  Is that where you are?  I've heard Redford is one of the places to consider but then I'm sure the numbers would have to be adjusted.  Do you have any estimates as to what kind of cash, return, & time frame I'd be looking at?

 Redford is great for buy and hold properties that have good rents. I cannot see it being a great place to flip. I love it for the cost vs. rents though. 40-50k is going to be your minimum all in cost for anything that is not completely destroyed though.