@Travis Biziorek well let's dive into DC vs. Detroit!
Here's Detroit's profile:
- Avg. Price of a 1-4 unit property: $162,533
- Avg. Annual Rent: $13,825
- Avg. Vacancy: 6.8% ($940)
- Avg. Property Tax ($2,438) - 1.5% (this is actually a LOW estimate for Detroit)
- Average insurance: 0.57% ($919)
- CapEx + Maintenance Allocation: $3,000 plug
- Property Management: 10% ($1,382.50)
- Cash Flow = Rent less expenses = $5,145
- CoC ROI = Cash flow/Cash Invested (Property Value: 3.17%
Now let's do Washington, DC:
- Avg. Price of a 1-4 unit property: $409,300
- Avg. Annual Rent: $26,420
- Avg. Vacancy: 6.2% ($1,638)
- Avg. Property Tax ($2,251) - 0.55% of property value
- Average insurance: 0.2% ($820) of property value
- CapEx + Maintenance Allocation: $3,000 plug
- Property Management: 10% ($2642)
- Cash Flow = Rent less expenses = $16,068
- CoC ROI = Cash flow/Cash Invested (Property Value): 4.02%
DC, relative to Detroit, may actually be the better cash flow market, on average. Investors forget that the 50% rule has absolutely no basis in reality, that the fixed expenses of property taxes and insurance have a huge impact on cash flow, particularly in markets with lower average priices and rents, and that vacancy rates can and do have a huge impact on long-term cash flow.
With regards to CapEx and maintenance, it's hard to get any real guesses here, so fire away with reasons that it might not be fair to attribute the same allocation to both DC and Detroit. Same with Property Management.
I would also like too point out that at double the effective rent, the average DC landlord is having a very different tenant management experience than the average Detroit landlord. I bet that this means that there may be less turnover, less CapEx and maintenance allocation needed, and perhaps lower property management fees. But, I do not have hard data to back that up.