Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Peter Babiy

Peter Babiy has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

Post: Buying to Rent vs. Building to Rent

Peter BabiyPosted
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1
  • Votes 1

Hello everyone!

First and foremost I'd like to introduce myself. My name is Peter, I'm 27 years old, and my wife and I reside in Seattle, WA. As far as real estate goes, our short term goal is to own at least 3 rental properties, then, our long term goal is to build our custom dream home. 

In short, my question is this: 

Does it make sense to buy land and build a new single-family home we can rent out vs. buying a fixer-upper and renting it out? 

The long version:

Seattle is a tough market, even in the suburbs it's extremely competitive. We've been looking for a decent fixer-upper for quite some time now, but options are limited, even at the auctions. After months of relentless searching, I had a different idea... Why not buy 1.5-2 acres of flat land, build a small rambler and move in. Since we're currently living in an apartment, this seems like a good logical first step. Then, sub-divide the land and build 2 more ramblers and rent them out. 

According to my math, not only would we save a substantial amount in acquisitions, our maintenance costs would be considerably lower. In addition, this approach would in a way hit two birds with one stone: it would allow us to enter the renters market, AND live essentially rent-free while we're building our dream home. Once we're ready to move into our new home, we'd rent out our 3rd rambler. Now we're living in a new home AND we own 3 rental properties...all for a MUCH lower price tag with minimal maintenance costs (vs. buying 3 fixer-uppers). 

Of course, the trade off is time and the hassle of building, but quite honestly I think I would enjoy the process. The idea that I could look at these properties one day and say "hey, I built this" really excites me.

Here's my math:

  • Land: 130k
  • Permits, road, utilities: 120k
  • Small rambler x3: 120k each
  • Misc: 30%

TOTAL COST: 793k

For land, permits, road, and utilities I'd pay with cash. Then I'd take out a construction loan on the remaining 500k'ish (with 20% down). 

At the end of the day, not only would I be saving at least 50k (vs. buying 3 fixer-uppers), I'd own 3 beautiful and brand new properties. The rent from the first 2 ramblers would cover the cost of my entire loan (and some), giving us time and allowing us to live rent-free while we build our dream home.

With that said, am I missing something? Any major drawbacks? Would you recommend for or against it? Because in my mind, it seems like THE way to go...but then again, what do I know :/

A little about me:

  • My background is in design, although I've spent the last decade or so running a tech company (software, design, digital marketing, etc)
  • We're currently renting an apartment, have some cash saved up and would like to diversify into real estate
  • No kids, no dept
  • I've never built a house, but the process doesn't intimidate me (besides, I'd be working with a builder)

Thank you so much for your time! Any advice is greatly appreciated :)

Peter