Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Pearla White

Pearla White has started 1 posts and replied 10 times.

Quote from @Mike Hourihan:

@Pearla White what do you do that brings in 200k? just curious

Transactional law and still a whole lot to learn about real estate apparently lol 
Quote from @Steve Vaughan:

As a private landlord I would agree as long as I could background check your sub-lessees. 

My PM I'm sure would not allow this.  They're just not in the exception business. 

Hopefully this specific property is owned and managed by a person vs Corp or entity, but at this pricepoint it's less likely is my guess.  Good luck either way!

Thanks. Perhaps I did not word my first post correctly. My intention is not to "sublease" per se or move someone in and go live some other place myself. Still, I was quite surprised at some of the answers here. 

Looking back, I have only resided in smaller units. It never occurred to me to notify a landlord that I have a family member or a good friend visiting from abroad. In fact, I never dealt with a manager or owner after the lease was signed, short of them sending someone over to fix a backed up sink once a year or so. 

They were happy to have a quiet tenant that kept the unit in good standing and paid rent on time. And I never had to worry about not getting my deposit back. I was under the impression the same was true for all the neighbors I crossed paths with. 

It looks like the more tenants you have in one building, the more headaches and the more restrictions. 

I will stick with dealing directly with private owners/renting from smaller buildings until I buy. lol 

Thanks for all the replies. This was eye opening. 
Quote from @Curtis Mears:

@Pearla White

No, my lease clearly states no sublease. I did have a tenant Airbnb one of my properties. Needless to say, he did not last long.

Thanks for sharing. 

It looks like he was doing something your lease prohibits behind your back. Would you kick a tenant out who rents a 3 bedroom from you, keeps the unit in good condition, pays rent on time and asks permission from you to let a friend occupy one of the guest rooms (after going through a BG check)?
Quote from @Kyle Varner:

Sounds like you are a doctor, and in that case I am very confident in your job prospects and thus my ability to collect what you owe me.  Back when I was managing my own units, I would have said yes to this arrangement.  Now, I have a property management company and they'd probably say no, and I'm not going to do anything without them because I don't have time to deal with tenants.

You will find a mom and pop landlord to do this.

But, please take my advice: You should *buy* a place. If you are a licensed doctor (or dentist, or veterinarian), there are like 101 lenders who will give you a loan for zero down on a primary residency, with no PMI. It would literally cost you less to move in by purchasing a place than by renting a place.

Worst case scenario, you decide to move out and you just rent the whole place out and basically break even but get appreciation and pay-down.  That's my unsolicited advice as someone who was in a very similar situation to you before I started buying every piece of real estate that I could.

Thanks for the advice. I am weighing the pros and cons of buying in my new state.

This is the only unit I am considering doing this with because it is a very well maintained RSO, in one of the most desirable area codes in the U.S, and is just at the price point where renting + access to other benefits (walking distance from work, school zoning, police coverage etc.) could tip the scale toward renting + investing in the stock market vs. tying up money in a mortgage.

It is almost impossible to buy comfortably in that zip code unless you are a multimillionaire. Housing like this rarely comes back on the rental market. I had to dig around to even found out about the RSO statute of the unit. 

I wish I had the scientific acumen for med school lol I took the easier path to a high income. 
- Your highschool mate with poor math skills.  

Quote from @Matt Devincenzo:
Quote from @Pearla White:
Quote from @Forrest Williams:

You should be able to take responsibility for your tenants and be the one on the lease. I would advise you put everyone on the lease though. Otherwise legally the others could trash the place and you'd be on the hook if they vanished in the night. It would be easiest to all apply together in my opinion. What are you going to do if the landlord says no, you can't add new tenants?

Your last line is precisely why I made this post. I would be surprised one could occupy a 3+3 and not be allowed to have another person come in, provided they pass a background check. What happens to people who get engaged or need a parent to move in, either of which will Riley have a weaker financial profile. 
The difference is adding a family member vs adding a roommate. If you want to add a roommate I can 100% say no, because that's a change to the lease terms (I rented to you and you alone). Adding a parent, spouse or having a child are all changes in familial status and would be fine. The familial change would actually be covered by fair housing legislation, though even if it weren't I would still allow the addition as a normal change in life circumstance. 
that is helpful, thanks!
Quote from @Matt Devincenzo:

From your title I thought I'd say no, but reading the description and more about your situation I'd be inclined to say yes. In my mind you're simply asking to move in with roommates, the difference in a normal RM situation is you don't already have two friends that you're looking with. But you by yourself seem to be able to qualify, so I can qualify you and we agree to some ground rules for your RM then I'd be comfortable with the coming/going.

Not having done this before I don't have a guideline, but my initial thoughts would be:

  • Clearly define are these 30 day stays or less than 30 day Airbnb type stays? 
  • Assuming 30 day + stays my tenant criteria are XXX (credit score, income, criminal etc), and you need to qualify each RM at that standard
  • Maybe we stablish a minimum timeframe for each RM e.g. 3 month etc to reduce turnover...though that's less important I think
  • Once you've chosen someone you and I do a single page addendum updating who it is you're renting to (or you at least agree to the minimum information you will keep in the event I need it). This is so I know who is/isn't in the home, but I will not be interfacing with them, that's your job. 
  • When you leave everyone else goes before hand, and all issues, damage etc are on you alone (you can pursue the RM for what they should cover)

Depending on the interest I already have in the property I may be looking for a bit of a rent premium. All things being equal if I can rent to a family for $4,500 then why rent to you with the possibility of a more involved tenancy? But for an additional $300-400/mo maybe that works. You would still likely save quite a bit on your monthly costs while being in the location you want, and I get a premium on the rent.

Great insight. Definitely no AirbNB. I work a high pressure job and cannot have high turnover around me, and do not mind having an empty room a times. More like an extra guest room that can be occupied at no additional stress to me because I am comfortable with who I bring in. 

I only looked into this scenario because I like the location, amenities and mots importantly RSO status

The extra $300-$400 you mention makes perfect sense but would probably discourage me as I am not actively seeking to fill the extra bedrooms. 

Thanks for giving your input!

Quote from @Forrest Williams:

You should be able to take responsibility for your tenants and be the one on the lease. I would advise you put everyone on the lease though. Otherwise legally the others could trash the place and you'd be on the hook if they vanished in the night. It would be easiest to all apply together in my opinion. What are you going to do if the landlord says no, you can't add new tenants?

Your last line is precisely why I made this post. 

Thanks for the advice on liabilities. I always found the trashing and housing court shenanigans in the U.S puzzling. Deep cleaning between tenants was something new to me when I moved here. Everyone I knew handed a clean unit back to the LL and the new tenant moved it in no time. They have more to lose in reputational damage, potential effect on professional career and immigration status than skipping rent or trashing a place. 

I was less concerned about liabilities as a lease holder then letting someone expect they can stay indefinitely as long as they pay rent because they are a co-tenant. 

Quote from @Forrest Williams:

I would not be keen to lease to someone who's going to let two unscreened tenants live with them. Yes, you may have screened them, but as a landlord I have no proof of that. And I'm not sure what your standards are, maybe you're fine with a 550 credit score for example. If you only want a student to live with you and screen out everyone else, that potentially puts ME at risk for a fair housing violation. Unlikely, but an unnecessary risk.

If you were fine sharing an apartment I would potentially consider letting by the room and putting my own tenants in the other rooms, however that is much more of a headache than renting out the unit as a whole. The best proposal you could make would be to have your roommates ready when you apply. If you make over 200k, you shouldn't have much of a problem qualifying, even if your other tenants aren't great.

I understand your concerns. I would definitely let the LL do his own screening. I meant to say present tenants I would have also pre-screened. 

If I have the other tenants ready and we apply together, am I still the master tenant? This is important to me because I would like to remain in the unit long term, eventually on my own. 

Would it be easier to qualify on my own and then reach out to the landlord for permission to add a new person to the lease while I remain the person paying the rent to the LL?

Quote from @Brad Jacobson:

Hi Pearla,

I self-manage my properties and often get inquiries like this.  I simply ask that all adults that will be living in the property apply.  It doesn't matter if the rent all comes from one individual or multiple, but it needs to be made clear that you're not the one screening and selecting your roommates.  That option needs to remain with the landlord as they have the ultimate duty of ensuring the property is leased properly.

If you can, start looking for potential sublease options now and apply jointly.  That would be the easiest way forward and I don't foresee any PM or small landlord having any issue with that as long as it applies with the local zoning laws.

Good luck!

Thanks for the response. It makes sense. 

But how do I manage to remain the master tenant if we apply together?

Would you recommend moving in on my own first, and later request permission to add someone to the lease?

What is the process like if I want to add a friend or distant relative moving to the U.S for school and they dont have a credit history?

Income: > $200,000 (gross) before bonuses; Credit: mid/high700 to 800; Rental History: Great, references available. Clean background. No pets, no smoking. Quiet, clean, responsible. So are the people I tend to be around. 

Desired Rental: 3Bedroom, 3Bath @ $4500/month in an expensive, safe location. 3X income is routinely preferred in the area. 

Job is new but very secure. You do not lose it or get fired. I am a great tenant. Landlords love me because I keep a very clean unit they like to showcase when owner/investor house tour is needed lol 

My dilemma: I need to live very close to work, in a very expensive area. I am also very responsible financially and have always lived below my means. Hence, I am looking to rent a place and sublease 1-2 rooms to a responsible tenant, likely someone with similar background or a student whose parent or guaranteed loans are footing the bill. I am very good at screening people. 

*** I want to remain the master lease holder and be responsible to pay the landlord ***

Would you rent me a $4,500 unit under these circumstances? Would I have freedom to move 1-2 people in or is this something that is frown upon? Under what circumstances would you let the other people in? 

I am looking to be a long term tenant and remain the lease holder. The unit I am looking at is a RSO. 

What can I do to be more attractive to a property manager given my desire to sublease, at least the first year, as I want to quickly pay off some educational loans and then live by myself in the same unit. 

Thanks