Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Paul C Minor

Paul C Minor has started 1 posts and replied 9 times.

Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:

3 million homes.  I see an opportunity for us to get on that train.  If the money is coming from the government (We the People), it won't raise the prices of houses because that expenditure is not coming from the builder, lender, or selling agent.  It could just end up being a tax break.  In the end, this is up to Congress, as they control the purse strings.  Also, stopping big companies like Zillow from buying up properties is a good thing.  There is no reason to make house-buying and renting a monopoly.  Make no mistake; people from both sides of the aisle would use this program if made available.


was the point to build 3 mil MORE homes than currently being built.. that will be tough given supply chains and manpower and zoning and land use rules.. your not going to for instance in Oregon bust the long standing urban growth boundary rules without revamping the entire states land use process's and laws.. plus what kind of housing.. ???  Projects for subsidized housing we all know how those end up.

 Think of it like infrastructure bills; if they are passed into law, they happen.  Of course we'll have to go through municipality zoning processes, but that's the nature of what we do.  There will be thousands of companies involved.  The bill proposal is in its early stages so I won't pretend to have all the answers, and I agree that subsidized housing initiatives need some work.


Feds have done subsidized housing already it creates basically ghettos.. I would think its too expensive to do SFR..  but maybe it will be like Habitat for Humans  although when you look at their projects houses biult as cheap as code will allow.. so to me I guess if you put them in dead and dying areas to spruce them up that could be an improvement

I live in a production home that's far from a ghetto.  These builders built the cheapest that code will allow.  The finishes we were allowed to choose were the only difference.


I get it I built half a dozen starter homes in FLA that were to minimum UBC code but they are still designed better than HFH when it comes to curb appeal.. and keep in mind your neighborhood is owner occ.. huge difference than subsidized housing.  I look at these projects as I move through the markets I work in  out east  MS AL OH MO etc etc.. and especially MS you look at a project that was built 5 years ago and its run down and no pride of ownership on 80% of them and basically just crap.

 I totally understand that houses need to be maintained - no matter how they're built.  Most recently, I worked with a client out here in Colorado that let their parade of homes house (from 25 years ago) in a gated community literally fall to pieces; mold between window panes, water infiltrating the kitchen due to lack of roof repair, patio pavers crumbling apart, downspout misplacements that caused water infiltration into the living room....just a mess.  The couple are both empty-nesters and each owns their own business.  They are myriad reasons as to why people let this happen, and I've personally witnessed it transcend socioeconomic boundaries.


I am just finishing up on a 90 home new build project I own in Oregon.. 700 to 1mil so first time move up basically..  there are 2 out of the 70 we have built that are going thorugh deteroration currently one you can tell from the outside.. the other I was in it the other day and the people are insanely messy.. hardwood floors ruined in less than 3 years just sad.. outside you would not know it.. but when they go to sell there will need to be a full gut remodel no doubt.  peeps are peeps

 This is true!  And the reasons vary, but probably not an appropriate discussion on BP, lol.

Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:

3 million homes.  I see an opportunity for us to get on that train.  If the money is coming from the government (We the People), it won't raise the prices of houses because that expenditure is not coming from the builder, lender, or selling agent.  It could just end up being a tax break.  In the end, this is up to Congress, as they control the purse strings.  Also, stopping big companies like Zillow from buying up properties is a good thing.  There is no reason to make house-buying and renting a monopoly.  Make no mistake; people from both sides of the aisle would use this program if made available.


was the point to build 3 mil MORE homes than currently being built.. that will be tough given supply chains and manpower and zoning and land use rules.. your not going to for instance in Oregon bust the long standing urban growth boundary rules without revamping the entire states land use process's and laws.. plus what kind of housing.. ???  Projects for subsidized housing we all know how those end up.

 Think of it like infrastructure bills; if they are passed into law, they happen.  Of course we'll have to go through municipality zoning processes, but that's the nature of what we do.  There will be thousands of companies involved.  The bill proposal is in its early stages so I won't pretend to have all the answers, and I agree that subsidized housing initiatives need some work.


Feds have done subsidized housing already it creates basically ghettos.. I would think its too expensive to do SFR..  but maybe it will be like Habitat for Humans  although when you look at their projects houses biult as cheap as code will allow.. so to me I guess if you put them in dead and dying areas to spruce them up that could be an improvement

I live in a production home that's far from a ghetto.  These builders built the cheapest that code will allow.  The finishes we were allowed to choose were the only difference.


I get it I built half a dozen starter homes in FLA that were to minimum UBC code but they are still designed better than HFH when it comes to curb appeal.. and keep in mind your neighborhood is owner occ.. huge difference than subsidized housing.  I look at these projects as I move through the markets I work in  out east  MS AL OH MO etc etc.. and especially MS you look at a project that was built 5 years ago and its run down and no pride of ownership on 80% of them and basically just crap.

 I totally understand that houses need to be maintained - no matter how they're built.  Most recently, I worked with a client out here in Colorado that let their parade of homes house (from 25 years ago) in a gated community literally fall to pieces; mold between window panes, water infiltrating the kitchen due to lack of roof repair, patio pavers crumbling apart, downspout misplacements that caused water infiltration into the living room....just a mess.  The couple are both empty-nesters and each owns their own business.  They are myriad reasons as to why people let this happen, and I've personally witnessed it transcend socioeconomic boundaries.

Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:

3 million homes.  I see an opportunity for us to get on that train.  If the money is coming from the government (We the People), it won't raise the prices of houses because that expenditure is not coming from the builder, lender, or selling agent.  It could just end up being a tax break.  In the end, this is up to Congress, as they control the purse strings.  Also, stopping big companies like Zillow from buying up properties is a good thing.  There is no reason to make house-buying and renting a monopoly.  Make no mistake; people from both sides of the aisle would use this program if made available.


was the point to build 3 mil MORE homes than currently being built.. that will be tough given supply chains and manpower and zoning and land use rules.. your not going to for instance in Oregon bust the long standing urban growth boundary rules without revamping the entire states land use process's and laws.. plus what kind of housing.. ???  Projects for subsidized housing we all know how those end up.

 Think of it like infrastructure bills; if they are passed into law, they happen.  Of course we'll have to go through municipality zoning processes, but that's the nature of what we do.  There will be thousands of companies involved.  The bill proposal is in its early stages so I won't pretend to have all the answers, and I agree that subsidized housing initiatives need some work.


Feds have done subsidized housing already it creates basically ghettos.. I would think its too expensive to do SFR..  but maybe it will be like Habitat for Humans  although when you look at their projects houses biult as cheap as code will allow.. so to me I guess if you put them in dead and dying areas to spruce them up that could be an improvement

I live in a production home that's far from a ghetto.  These builders built the cheapest that code will allow.  The finishes we were allowed to choose were the only difference.

Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:
Quote from @Pete Widell:

Funny, no mention at all of her unrealized gains tax she has bandied about. 


 That's for those with a net worth of more than $100 million.  Congrats if you're there.


Net worth and liquidity to pay tax are two very different things.. I cant see this getting passed either.. sounds great to all the billionare haters  though.

 Agreed that piece likely won't pass.  Citizens United all but ensures that since said billionaires can lobby for candidates as if they were people.

Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Paul C Minor:

3 million homes.  I see an opportunity for us to get on that train.  If the money is coming from the government (We the People), it won't raise the prices of houses because that expenditure is not coming from the builder, lender, or selling agent.  It could just end up being a tax break.  In the end, this is up to Congress, as they control the purse strings.  Also, stopping big companies like Zillow from buying up properties is a good thing.  There is no reason to make house-buying and renting a monopoly.  Make no mistake; people from both sides of the aisle would use this program if made available.


was the point to build 3 mil MORE homes than currently being built.. that will be tough given supply chains and manpower and zoning and land use rules.. your not going to for instance in Oregon bust the long standing urban growth boundary rules without revamping the entire states land use process's and laws.. plus what kind of housing.. ???  Projects for subsidized housing we all know how those end up.

 Think of it like infrastructure bills; if they are passed into law, they happen.  Of course we'll have to go through municipality zoning processes, but that's the nature of what we do.  There will be thousands of companies involved.  The bill proposal is in its early stages so I won't pretend to have all the answers, and I agree that subsidized housing initiatives need some work.

Quote from @Pete Widell:

Funny, no mention at all of her unrealized gains tax she has bandied about. 


 That's for those with a net worth of more than $100 million.  Congrats if you're there.

3 million homes.  I see an opportunity for us to get on that train.  If the money is coming from the government (We the People), it won't raise the prices of houses because that expenditure is not coming from the builder, lender, or selling agent.  It could just end up being a tax break.  In the end, this is up to Congress, as they control the purse strings.  Also, stopping big companies like Zillow from buying up properties is a good thing.  There is no reason to make house-buying and renting a monopoly.  Make no mistake; people from both sides of the aisle would use this program if made available.

Post: Architectural Design Firm

Paul C MinorPosted
  • Posts 9
  • Votes 19

It depends on the project type.  If your project single-family residential we can design in most other states.  If it's commercial then you're looking at Colorado, Florida, and California.

Post: Architectural Design Firm

Paul C MinorPosted
  • Posts 9
  • Votes 19

Whether you have a single-family or multifamily development (or anywhere in between), we'd be interested in speaking with you.  We provide full service architectural design, as well as feasibility studies (predesign services) for prospective property purchases.

What sets us apart is our commitment to excellence and attention to detail. We understand that each project is unique, which is why we take the time to listen to your specific requirements and goals. By leveraging our creativity, technical expertise, and industry knowledge, we can help you maximize the potential of your property and achieve exceptional results.

If you're considering a new project or need assistance with an existing one, we'd love to speak with you further. Our team is ready to collaborate with you every step of the way, from initial concept development to project completion. Let's schedule a consultation to discuss how we can support your vision and make your project a success.

Blackstone Architecture, Inc.

(720) 222-5009

Arvada, Colorado

www.blackstone-arch.com