Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Patrick Knock

Patrick Knock has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

I've done a few fix and flips in the Dallas Ft. Worth Metro area, and I know that a general rule of thumb for buying properties is 70% of ARV minus repairs. The houses I flipped had an ARV of 100,000 each, so I bought them for around 60,000 roughly. I have recently moved to Los Angeles, and the housing prices out here are way higher. The average home is about 400,000 each. In order to apply the 70% rule, you would have to buy the house for 280,000 and then take off even more for the repairs. Is that how investors are pricing things out here? Or do they ease up a little on the discounts? $100000 profit for 30 days labor on a fix and flip seems a bit unrealistic, but what do you all think?