Thank you all very much for the range of perspectives you shared above. Just to add some context to my original post:
- The $30k in capital gains is, indeed, mostly depreciation recapture. It was depreciated ~$100k over ~5 years. The rest is from a modest profit at the time of sale. I bought for $600k and sold for $640k — however, I say modest because there was a last-minute seller assist of ~$30k that took quite a bite out of the proceeds.
- To get a little more specific on profits and losses: my parents gave me $150k and I gave them back the net $166k from the sale. Per my records, I had a loss of ~$30k over ~5 years from management costs, repairs, appliances, etc. My loss was somewhat offset by the tax benefit I had from reporting depreciation over 5 years, but it's been difficult for me to quantify exactly how much I benefited. I'm not a CPA and I had other income and expenses that were commingled with the property on my returns.
- It's not lost on me that my parents acted as a lender, and that a lender would never pay someone's taxes. However, can I suggest a different analogy here? Since I returned their principal investment and the profits in full, wouldn't I have been more akin to a investment broker who was acting on their behalf?
- I fully understand that in the eyes of the IRS I'm still the one to pay the tax because the income was in my name. But intuitively — I gave back to my parents everything they gave me, and then some. If you gave a stock broker $150k and they gave you more than that back, the broker wouldn't be the one to pay capital gains. I absolutely, 100% realize that I need to be the one to pay the tax bill. So my question (which could have been clearer) is less about tax burdens and more of an ethical one of: which party should the tax payment originate from? Maybe I posted this in the wrong forum, but appreciate all candid and respectful takes here all the same.
- To the small minority who chimed in with something to the tune of "geez, I'd disown you too, you little Gen-Z brat": maybe take a beat before you judge somebody's character by a low-context post here. The money my parents gave me was a guilt payment for a lot of messed up stuff that happened in my childhood. It's not something I felt entitled to, but they offered it freely and I tried to do something constructive with it. It was a messy deal with a messy outcome. I'm trying to do what I can tie it up equitably, so I appreciate everyone's input here.