Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Nicole L Redwine

Nicole L Redwine has started 2 posts and replied 3 times.

I recently bought a piece of property in my hometown.  Prior to closing, there was some issue clearing the title.  Not sure what exactly the issue was, but I do know the seller was one of those Quiet Claim deed companies.

I closed in July.  Still have no deed in hand (I paid cash).  

My agent reached out to the attorney's office and now I have this email from them:


"We received the recorded deed back from the court, but upon receipt and review for issuance of the owner's title policy, noted the legal description did not contain enough identifying information.  Accordingly, we prepared and send to the seller a corrective LWD.  We felt this necessary in order not to place a cloud on the title from this point forward.  As soon as the executed deed is returned, we will forward to the court for recording.  Upon receipt of the corrective deed, we will forward along with the owner's title policy."

Can anyone translate that for me?  Is it literally that the LWD could have been missing one tiny piece of information?

Thanks, Thomas.  I agree that having my uncle evict the guy is much easier than me doing it.  For sure.

And I consider myself fairly "creative" so I'm picking up what you're putting down.  

So this is a long story... but I wanted to ask people's experience, if anyone has some.

The VERY condensed version is that I am potentially going to purchase a house/property from my uncle.  He owns a house that has a "tenant" -- however, this tenant has NOT paid rent or utilities in 18 years (don't ask -- I don't know why my uncle allowed this to go on).  At this point in my uncle's life, with a VERY ill wife, etc, he does not want to own the property anymore and has offered to finance it for me so I can renovate or build a new house to sell.  

However, I would have to evict the current tenant.  Has anyone ever bought a property with a tenant who needed to be evicted?  

(Just to be clear, he will not and cannot do the eviction himself.)