Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Nick Maugeri

Nick Maugeri has started 20 posts and replied 163 times.

Post: Two houses on one lot

Nick MaugeriPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Modesto, CA
  • Posts 170
  • Votes 70
Quote from @Cliff Benner:
Quote from @Nick Maugeri:
Quote from @Brent Geubtner:

I'm looking into a property that has two seperate houses on the same single lot. Is this a tax advantage over having two lots (one for each property)? I'm figuring that paying for one lot is better than paying for two in terms of taxes. Are there any other implications to having two houses on one lot that I may not be considering?


Should purchase two separate lots instead of two homes on one. Two homes on one lot will not appreciate as easily/quickly as individual homes on their own lots. Also, your buyer pool is greatly lowered when you try and sell, consider carrying costs and demand versus affordability in your area at projected time of exit.


I know for me, I would be more worried about the an appraisal, the property i found is one lot with two houses on it, the houses are the same sizes as the rest in the neighborhood and the purchase price is comparable to one house in the neighborhood. So if I could get them each appraised as the same value as the houses around, then it would be a great BRRRR I would hold onto for a long time.


Doesn't quite work like that. Appraisers will seek out other properties that are most similar - they use other sales that comp for two homes on one lot, three homes, etc. They don't say the median PPSF is $230, average home size at 1,500 SF results in value of $345K. Two homes results in $690K appraised value. They are instead going to find comps where two homes on one lot sold within a certain distance at $500K, and three homes on one lot sold for $650K, then establish an average and adjust for conditions. A glaring mistake many folks make is building an ADU and thinking that the PPSF is going to be tacked on to their home which is not the case. Rather, the appraiser will use other sales that have one home with an ADU as a comp, or JADU, etc.

Post: Two houses on one lot

Nick MaugeriPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Modesto, CA
  • Posts 170
  • Votes 70
Quote from @Brent Geubtner:

I'm looking into a property that has two seperate houses on the same single lot. Is this a tax advantage over having two lots (one for each property)? I'm figuring that paying for one lot is better than paying for two in terms of taxes. Are there any other implications to having two houses on one lot that I may not be considering?


Should purchase two separate lots instead of two homes on one. Two homes on one lot will not appreciate as easily/quickly as individual homes on their own lots. Also, your buyer pool is greatly lowered when you try and sell, consider carrying costs and demand versus affordability in your area at projected time of exit.

Post: Moving up in investment strategy

Nick MaugeriPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Modesto, CA
  • Posts 170
  • Votes 70
Quote from @Kenny Tran:

Hi all,

Just wanted to get some advice from the veteran investors out there. I'm 29 years old and bought my first investment property two years ago for $130K. I purchased it well below market value (which was around $190K at the time), and I was able to BRRRR it—so I currently have zero money invested! Today, it's worth about $200K. I cash flow around $60 a month from it, and I've got about $70K in equity. The low cash flow is mainly due to the 8% interest rate, but hey—I'm not complaining.

Now, I’m looking to “move up” and use a 1031 exchange to roll that equity into a duplex with stronger cash flow. Based on some rough numbers in my area, one side of the duplex would cover all expenses, and the other side would be pure cash flow—around $1,600/month. So I’d be jumping from $60 to $1,600 in monthly cash flow.

My strategy is to move my equity into something turnkey and with better cash flow. My question to all the veterans is: what do you think of this approach? The only downside I can think of is that, since I’d be buying at close to retail value, I probably won’t see much appreciation. Also, the property barely appreciated in 2 years due to the current economy so should I wait a little longer to see it appreciate more or cash in that 70k equity and move on. I understand its a personal preference on what to do and I am in no financial strain to need to sell right away.

I'd also love to hear from some veteran investors who started out like I did and worked their way up from SFH to apartments or commercial buildings. Hearing your stories would really motivate me!


Not sure how age is relevant. I recommend doing a 1031 into a commercial property as it sounds like that's what your ultimate goal is. The answer to waiting for more appreciation versus exchanging now - exchange now, the tax benefits will outweigh the appreciation over two years unless you're expecting dramatic growth suddenly in the area. Commercial allows you to force appreciation, so run a CBA on several options and do not go turnkey - need something with a small amount of value add.

Post: Help Me Think Through My Investment Property in Central Mass

Nick MaugeriPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Modesto, CA
  • Posts 170
  • Votes 70

If your property is in an area the city is trying to redevelop - see if they can assist, there may be grants, etc. Otherwise, cut your losses and move on. A CBA or IRR analysis will point to this strategy as well.

Post: ROI Realty Partners- Why Investors Should Pay Attention to Hickory, NC

Nick MaugeriPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Modesto, CA
  • Posts 170
  • Votes 70

@Ivette Raygoza this is a good example of what we discussed yesterday in how to build a team in various markets. Kasey's location is set to Charlotte but she is providing sub-market analytics which implies that she may operate from Charlotte to Greensboro - and several others. Much of this data is likely taken from low level news or publications, but she's compiled and presented it in a clean way without the fluff. This is what you want on your team when purchasing out of state. Note the 'diverse' rental strategies as we discussed, supplemented with growing demand and stability from education and infrastructure through the general plan. 

Quote from @Jason DiDonato:

The numbers when I do that are significantly skewed because the rents were so low. Purchase price was $600K. Rental income was $3,505 ($42,060 annual). Expenses when purchased $16,518 ($6,360 annual 10% capx), NOI of $25,542. Cap Rate was 4.3%.

Current rents are now $80,400, Expenses are $21,540 (10% capx included), NOI of $58,860. If I did the same 4.3% cap rate the value would be $1.3 mill which is not an accurate value for the property, unless I'm missing something!


Looking to understand value as we will need to potentially refinance in 1-2 years because its seller financed and has a larger rate increase and ballon clause in the near future.
  


I don't know all of the details, but high level estimates: 

Acquisition: 

GOI: $42,060 

EGOI: Less 2.5% vacancy, $41,430

Taxes, R&M, Capex, Insurance, PM: Less 40% (est.)

NOI: $24,860

CAP: 4.3%

Existing:

GOI: $80,400

EGOI: $79,195

NOI: $47,516

CAP at 4.3%: $1.1M

The CAP in your market it not 4.3%, likely closer to 8%: Value then is ± $595K. You can confirm this based on (1) comparable sales and (2) contacting local CRE Brokers to determine market CAP for asset type. You don't use the same CAP rate, just because you purchased at a 4.3 CAP does not mean that the CAP is 4.3%.

Quote from @Jason DiDonato:

I was looking more towards the market cap rate.  Trying to get a better understanding of what the true value of the property may be.  We have a change in the interest rate for year 4 and 5 before final balloon payment is due and I was just looking to see what value might be based on what we have and will be getting the rents up too.  Appreciate everyone's help!


Contact a local CRE Broker and ask them what the market CAP rate is for your asset type (MU/FLEX). You should want one on your team anyway. If you need recommendations, referrals, etc., send a DM and I'll share a few professionals who do the most volume in your market.

Post: Where to Lease Commercial Real Estate Effectively

Nick MaugeriPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Modesto, CA
  • Posts 170
  • Votes 70

You need more exposure, pay a CRE Broker and they will get it Leased. Probably only cost you 1-2 months of rent on the fee and that's better than vacant units for 3-5 months. They'll also bring a better tenant than you'll find on your own.

CAP is not estimated. You just need to run comps to determine CAP for a given market. Looks like you should be around 8%. To determine your CAP, divide $50,220 by the purchase price. If your asset can be valued at an 8 CAP, current value is $627,750.

Post: Commercial Lease Renewal

Nick MaugeriPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Modesto, CA
  • Posts 170
  • Votes 70

The Lease should not renew automatically for an indefinite amount of time, consult and pay commission to a CRE Broker to handle this.