@Jane Istre
If you have a property in a lower class area that your lacking demand for which is evident or else it wouldn’t be vacant. Wouldn’t raising prices be counterintuitive to the solution of filling your problem?
Also if you’re in a lower class area that’s having issues with crime, in my opinion a house keeper required for the property would stand out. If that stood out then it wouldn’t be hard for the potential tenants to put the two together and feel offended by the idea is that your perception believes they need a housekeeper as if they’re irresponsible or perceived to be messy which may lead to them looking elsewhere.
If they meet your criteria, have no negative history then the risk of carrying your expenses on a vacant is probably more of a downside than the risk of renting to them.
If you’re renting to a younger group, it’s not a bad idea to allow digital payments done online if that’s an option as analog cashiers checks are sometimes less appreciated for a younger crowd.
Also if there is 3 separate people that are close together, it would probably be easiest to designate the primary contact of the group which you’ll relay information, communicate back and forth regarding property details such as payments, notices, etc.
Plenty of people all over the US rent to groups of guys that live together prior to them settling down and purchasing a house in their desired future place. If they’re properly qualified it sounds like a good opportunity to fill your vacancy.
Also take maximum security deposit just to hedge in case they damage the property by doing something stupid.
Also with a group, a higher penalty for late payments could lead to a better responsibility of them not being late out of being slow to make payment or “forgetting” to on time.