Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Nic A.

Nic A. has started 4 posts and replied 17 times.

Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Originally posted by @Dillon Kenniston:

@Nathan Gesner Makes sense, thanks for clarifying. What we described is what I meant by a "wrap" mortgage. (Hope I was using the term correctly.)

So it sounds like the implication is:

  • 100% Equity = 100% seller financing available
  • 1-99% Equity = wrap mortgage available (proportional to whatever equity the seller has)
  • 0% Equity = sub-2 

Would y'all agree?

A "subject to" sale does not require no equity. The Seller could have 10% or 99% equity. The only requirement is that they have an existing mortgage. The buyer offers to take over the mortgage payments and the seller transfers ownership to the Buyer. For example:

Dave owns a house worth $200,000 but owes $150,000. Due to failing health, he can no longer afford the payments. Bob offers to purchase the home as a "subject to". Dave transfers the deed to Bob and Bob takes over the existing mortgage. Dave gets to walk away and Bob gets a house with no down-payment, no REALTOR, no bank, etc.

The downsides? Dave is transferring the deed so that Bob legally owns the property but the mortgage is still in Dave's name. If Bob misses a payment, it can impact Dave's credit rating. If Bob defaults and the property is foreclosed, that foreclosure goes on Dave's record. The downside for Bob is that the bank may learn of the transfer and decide to enforce their "due on sale" clause. This would force Bob to seek traditional financing and pay the original mortgage off. The hope is that he would buy it at a low enough price that this wouldn't be a problem in an emergency.

Again, I hope that helps.

@Nathan Gesner in this scenario is Dave paying taxes on the difference of Bobs payment minus the mortgage? Also in this scenario if Dave is currently collecting $450 in cash flow from tenants how can I present a deal that’s still lucrative to Dave.


Funny enough I’m working through a deal with these exact numbers and scenario.

Quote from @Jordan Moorhead:

We have an amazing contact in San Antonio for an agent, property manager and also a good contractor!


Could you share your referral for a contractor?

Post: Seeking Plumber in San Antonio

Nic A.Posted
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Pele Lewis-Zavala:

Hi Jake, I got some recommendations but have yet to move forward with the repairs. I plan to take care of that in a couple of weeks and would be happy to let you know how it goes!

@Pele Lewis-Zavala could you share the contact info for the recommendations you received?

I am looking to structure an offer using a "subject to" deal but am doing this for the first time. I'd like to bring on a local real-estate lawyer to help with the contracts. I'd also like to connect with anyone out there that has closed on other properties using a subject to approach.

Thanks in advance for any info!

Quote from @Nate R.:

I have a property in San Antonio that I have been wanting to sell for awhile. The tenant is on a one-year lease that expires in a couple of months. 

They have not kept up with the rent and are behind by more than a month, but they have been making payments recently. My property manager doesn't want to evict, even though at one point they were so far behind it seemed obvious to me that we would never collect the past due rent. He suggests waiting until the lease expires before taking any action. 

I've considered just selling to another investor rather rather than dealing with an eviction, fixing up the property and listing it on the MLS. How would I find an investor to sell to? I get these postcards from "cash for houses" buyers, but I assume they'd be looking for very deep discounts. I'm not sure if I can believe the Zillow estimates, but with the current value listed there, I would be sitting on over $100k in equity with about 50% LTV.


 Curious to know if this is still an open situation or if it's been resolved and how? 

Post: Looking For Reliable Handyman

Nic A.Posted
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 1

Hi BP forum! I am looking for a reliable handyman to help with a few repair projects I have for rental properties across San Antonio. Thanks in advance for the recommendations! Would be great to also have any background on the recommendations such as projects they've worked on for you or knowledge of projects they've worked on.

Post: New Investor in San Antonio

Nic A.Posted
  • Posts 19
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Jordan Moorhead:

@Sachin Relia I invest there but don't work in the 2-4 unit space in San Antonio. I do like the market but my biggest issue has been property taxes. Make sure if you get it below the assessed value that you protest taxes and send them the HUD!


 Great tip! How soon after purchase can you protest the taxes? Or is it based around a yearly timeline to submit a claim?