Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Nathan Gomes

Nathan Gomes has started 3 posts and replied 13 times.

Post: your take on renters insurance?

Nathan GomesPosted
  • Livonia, MI
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 3

@Frank Chin

Lowering the rent and giving the tenant the difference seems more approachable, but still requires some extra steps. And the tenant could cancel the policy any time, unless there is a way to mitigate against this and take punitive action? It's an easier sell to give a rent credit for getting the insurance rather than imposing an additional charge to the tenant. It would feel like a bait and switch on the advertised rent.

I don't know why I said 15/month is 300 per year, it's only 180. Anyway i don't like the thought of forced insurance. In New Hampshire you don't even have to get car insurance. Live free or die!

Post: your take on renters insurance?

Nathan GomesPosted
  • Livonia, MI
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 3

Yes, it's personal responsibility.  The owners were correct that it was the tenants' duty to insure themselves if they wished.  Red Cross and GoFundMe can take care of them.

$15/month is $300 in a year, not a small amount for low income folks.

Originally posted by @JD Martin:

Unless you are prepared to take action if they don't get it, and/or cancel it, I wouldn't bother. Action means that you will take failure to ensure as grounds for eviction. Keeping up with who has and has not kept up their renters insurance and evicting those who failed to get it, or keep it, would be nothing short of aggravating. We recommend it and leave it at that, and maintain our own good insurance policies. If a place burns down or is hit by a meteorite, and they lose all their stuff because they didn't have renter's insurance, oh well. 

I like this position and it makes the most sense to me.

Post: your take on renters insurance?

Nathan GomesPosted
  • Livonia, MI
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @JD Martin:

We recommend it but realize that most don't get it, and if they do get it there's nothing to keep them from cancelling it or failing to renew. Unless you are going to take action on tenants that do not get it, I wouldn't make it an actionable issue. Sometimes it is going to depend on your market; I live in an area where probably 50% of homeowners don't have insurance, so to expect that renters are going to keep up on something like that is laughable. 

Personally, I don't care if they carry it or not. I have excellent insurance, and if the tenant does something and my insurance has to pay, they are going to go after the tenant to abrogate their losses. If the tenant doesn't have any insurance, well, they'll have to deal with the insurance company in court. If the tenant suffers a loss because they don't have insurance, well, that's really too bad for them. Either way, I'm not going to get into the business of carrying out evictions over renter's insurance. 

I agree with JD here.  I've been doing this for less than a year, but the points JD makes are logical to me.  It seems too difficult to enforce.

During my years as a tenant, I never bought rental insurance and I would have balked at requirements to do so.

Post: Security deposit interest

Nathan GomesPosted
  • Livonia, MI
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

@Nathan Gomes I have no idea what the rate is but it's about $25 a month.

 Yeah at 2.2% APY $300k should pay about $550/month

Post: Security deposit interest

Nathan GomesPosted
  • Livonia, MI
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

@Nathan Gomes it's not worth bothering about. I hold almost $300,000 in security deposits and I think we're earning around $25 interest. You won't earn much unless you hold a significant amount of funds.

 But a 2.2% APY account would pay a lot more than $25 on $300,000.  I make $25 per month on only $15k in my Ally savings.

Post: Millionaire - RICH or Middle Class?

Nathan GomesPosted
  • Livonia, MI
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 3

Yeah, I'm aiming for $1 million yearly income rather than $1m net worth.  One million net worth doesn't carry a lot of weight these days.

I only recently got my first property occupied but I plan to raise rent every year, even if it's by a tiny amount.  Have to enforce the expectation that it will increase.  

What if you bluff and see how the tenant responds?

Post: Security deposit interest

Nathan GomesPosted
  • Livonia, MI
  • Posts 13
  • Votes 3

My Chase Business savings account pays negligible interest, and I would like a higher interest bearing account in which to place security deposits so I can keep the interest (in Michigan where this is allowed).

Where is a good place to put security deposits to get significant interest? My personal savings account is with Ally and pays 2.2% APY presently, but I cannot open an account under my LLC there. If I open another savings account there under my name it feels like commingling.

Thanks guys--

Will cost segregation end up costing me more to perform than the amount I end up saving? I closed on my first SFH on January 18, so I'm just starting out in this. But I want to deduct and depreciate wherever I can.