As stated in the original post: The contract does not explicitly state that "this contract will be deemed void if closing does not occur by closing date." It actually doesn't explicitly state anything about what happens if the closing date passes.
After speaking to a local attorney, he stated that even after an “expired” closing date, if there is intent to continue, the contract still applies even if the contract requires both parties to sign an addendum in writing, which this contract did. The reason for that, he states, is because if you’re taken to court, a judge would most likely rule on the fact that you continued to pursue a purchase agreement after the expiration date.
Seth is correct in stating that the seller could sue the buyer for the cost they incurred, agent fees, and if they sell for lower, then the buyer could have to cover the difference if awarded in court. According to the attorney, with little to no EMD in the deal, the buyer, if sued, could get away with little fees incurred to go through the process/court. During the time of litigation, the property can't be sold or marketed for sale until a judgement is made, which could take up to or more than a year if it were to get dragged out. In the case where a seller is out to sell the property quickly, it wouldn't be in their best interest to go through with all of that and would most likely sign a termination or release from the contract and take the next best offer.
In our case we are the buyers. This property (that was out of state), we got under contract without seeing (besides agent-sent pictures and an inspection report). It ended up having major structural issues that the inspector we chose (and who was highly rated) didn’t even mention In his report. We found this out on the final walk through that we did in person, our first time seeing the property with our own eyes. The seller blatantly lied on the seller disclosure (obvious cover up attempts were noted). The seller also left the place absolutely trashed. In this case, we had the right to go back to the seller and hold them responsible for providing false information on the seller disclosure and condition of the property if we had wanted.
At the end of the day, we ended up receiving a Termination of Contract from the agent the following day after the walk through... WITHOUT even having told them we were not happy with the walk through. We believe they tried to take advantage of us as out of state investors until we flew in to do a final walk through in person, noticed the issues and knew that these issues weren’t on our inspection report or seller disclosure. The agents had been pressing us to close, ignored phone calls and texts, and even turned the power off immediately before we did our walk through. They had been completely shady throughout the whole buying process and it was a dual agency with the sellers interest above ours, but that’s a whole other story. So, we believe they presumed we were going to attempt to get out of the contract after seeing the property first hand and didn’t want any conflict by sending over the termination of contract without us asking for it. They were correct!
Lessons learned:
1. Build yourself a trustworthy team in the area you’re looking to invest in. We made the mistake of assuming this agent was on our team. Don’t assume.
2. Inspection reports will not reveal 100% of issues, which we understand. However, even HUGE “in-your-face” issues may not make it into the report. Hire a good inspector who knows what you’re looking for.
3. Contracts apparently have a lot more wiggle room than the black and white printed on the paper. Make sure you know your local/state laws and talk to an attorney if you’re unsure.
New investors (especially out of state) we hope you take notes and learn from this as we have.