Originally posted by Rich text editorRich text editor@Andrey Y.:
Please do keep us posted. The idea of him letting in non-accredited investors is very telling. If the DEAL is good enough, you wouldn't need non-accredited investors.
The requisite funds would be swiftly raised from accredited investors if the deal is good. Same goes for needing a massive brand and marketing campaign.
The need has to do with the amount of money being raised, not the investor accreditation. Every syndicator has a base of investors that they can tap to fund deals, but to keep growing, they need to be able to reach new investors. That's why they partner with equity-raisers, advertise deals to the general public or offer them on crowdfunding platforms.
Certain types of SEC exemptions don't allow them to advertise to the public unless they are for accredited investors only, but for Reg A offerings they can.
Because it has become cheap to service a high volume of investors using technology, there are now more companies doing offerings with low minimums to non-accredited investors using these new regulations (like Cardone Capital, Fundrise, Realty Mogul, etc).
What pool of capital is larger: the pool of accredited investor money (what is that, 1% of the general population) or the general public's?