Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Nader Hachem

Nader Hachem has started 41 posts and replied 124 times.

Post: FINDING TOO MANY DEALS?!!?

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41
Originally posted by @Jonathan Greene:

You are just running newbie projections that don't translate to real life. Taking a standard 25% of anything is misleading and will help you lose money in most cases because you are putting the data first. How many properties have you see in real life for investment? If zero, you shouldn't be buying. You need to see a ton of properties so the numbers and formulas you are running make sense. The plague for new investors is just running data based on some random formula or calculation and not realizing that costs are all market-specific and property-specific and if you don't know what to look for, no calculation will save you.

I've been to a few properties but definitely not enough. I would agree that things differ from property to property or market to market... At what point do you run your numbers? What it seems like would make sense would be to run a nice conservative calculation, see if the property is worth visiting, visit the property which helps you fine tune your numbers and come back to decide if the property is worth it or not. There has to be a way to vet out the bad properties so you're not visiting every property you see. You could use the 1% rule but again, that's just a suggestion and you see that pretty often where i am

What is your approach of analyzing properties? I honestly got 25% from the following: 6% for vacancy which was pulled from the specific city data, 5% for capex and 5% for repairs (pulled from online searches) then 8-10% for property management.
 

Post: FINDING TOO MANY DEALS?!!?

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

There are plenty of properties in the area that can cash flow.  We are blessed to live in an area that does. 

But, what is more important is understanding total return.  For example, what kind of cash-on-cash returns are you seeing?  

When I was investing in single family, I regularly invested in properties getting $500/mo in cash flow, but more important, generated 20%+ cash on cash returns.  Those are harder to find now.

The CoC returns are usually 9-13% which I'm fine with. I'm more focused on getting a property which helps me over the hump. I also know that 9-13% isn't a total Return, doesn't take in account appreciation, tax benefits or mortgage paydown. Some people may not pay attention to that but personally I think you should! The biggest benefit of real estate is that it provides 4 ways of income! Unlike stocks which is only appreciation + dividends (sometimes)

Post: FINDING TOO MANY DEALS?!!?

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41

Okay okay the title might be a bit misleading. I'm currently a real estate investor in the midwest, more specifically Metro Detroit. I've read a few of the biggerpockets books and spent a lot of time watching the podcasts, reading forums, etc. One thing I hear often is that there aren't enough deals out there, blah blah… When I run my numbers i run them setting aside ~25% for expenses (vacancy, repairs, cap ex, Prop management - even though ill be managing the first one myself). With these numbers i find a good amount that meet my cash flow goals of $200 per door. 

What's the explanation? Is it just because I'm in the midwest ill be cashflowing often - but no appreciation. Am I running numbers right ( i have an agent who runs the reports with comps)

Thoughts?

Post: Becoming a home inspector

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41

I've been interested in everything real estate and I'm currently looking for my first rental property within the next year, but in the meantime I have some spare time and have been looking for some extra cash while saving for the rental.

I've thought of becoming a home inspector on the side, it'll help me with some extra cash all while learning about real estate - to an extent that some of the books can't teach you.

Anyone out there have experience in becoming a home inspector, thoughts?

Currently in Michigan.

Post: Investing in SFHs in Redford, MI

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41

@Joe Villeneuve yep I see that road, analyzed a few both south and north of that area. Will continue to do my research of Redford! Looks like a very promising area

Post: Investing in SFHs in Redford, MI

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:

Redford has been one of my areas to invest in over the years. The great thing about it is it's very consistent, and ever changing, at the same time.  Redford, for those unfamiliar with it, is 2 miles wide, and about 5 miles tall (N/S).  To the East is Detroit, and the West Livonia (much better than Detroit).  Redford is divided up into South Redford (better section), and North Redford (Redford Union)...with those two different school systems and zip codes.  Redford's name came from a Ford Plant on the Rouge (red) River.  (How creative, LOL...ask me how the city of NOVI was got their name).

Now, if you looked at this info above, most outside observers could come to a rational conclusion about property values, areas to buy for rentals,...flip, and so on...and, most would be wrong.  Redford is made up of, based on my last market analysis (done last week actually) at least 15 different micro- markets ranging from good to bad rental areas, to good to bad flip areas, and good to bad combinations of rental and flip areas.

What I wrote above can be used to describe almost every area of the country though.  Just edit the size, name, flanking cities, and number of micro-markets and substitute that info with the info from the market you are analyzing, and you have your market.

 Thanks for sharing that Joe! When referring to "N and S" Redford, what would you say the dividing point between the two is, I-96? Is that market analysis something you're willing to share? (Understand if not). 

And where did NOVI come from!?

Post: Things to look for when first checking out a rental property

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41

What kind of things do you guys look for when first checking out a rental property, aside from the obvious roof, windows, furnace, big ticket items. Are there things that you specifically like to check out when going to your first showing of the house?

Post: Investing in SFHs in Redford, MI

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41

For those who invest in the Redford area, what are your thoughts? I've been looking for my first rental property in Redford/Taylor areas and Redford seems like a good area as far as the numbers - cheaper single family houses (<150K) and higher rents. How is Redford outside the spreadsheet? Are there areas (west/ east of telegraph or north/south of 96) to avoid? Or areas that thrive? Good/Bad neighborhoods?

Let me know your thoughts!

Post: Real Estate Vs Other Investments

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41
Originally posted by @Jeff He:

@Nader Hachem

I invest in both real estate and the stock market.

The 401k is nice because of its tax status. If you're a high earner, a traditional 401k will lower your tax status. If you have a lot of time until retirement, a Roth 401k let's your earnings grow tax free. (cough cough Peter Thiel's untaxable $5billion IRA). I've gotten good returns on the stock market and plan to continue to invest it.

Real estate is nice because it's less volatile then the stock market. I haven't seen my money grow as fast as my stake in $SQ ($33/share to $230/share), but I have still gotten good returns. I do like that Real Estate is easier to analyze than stocks. It's a lot easier to invest in a legitimate good deal than to engage in speculation. I also plan to continue to invest in real estate.

The key takeaway is that it's important to diversify. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.

Disclaimer: Not tax or financial advice. Please seek a professional

 Definitely think each has their own advantages. Also, i believe real estate would have much better tax benefits over time!

Post: Real Estate Vs Other Investments

Nader HachemPosted
  • Dearborn, MI
  • Posts 124
  • Votes 41

@Justin Windham great point! I follow that same logic - retirement accounts/stock investment and real estate. It's not one or the other, it could be both. I know there's situations where you could use your Roth to purchase properties (don't know much about it). But it's great to diversity.

The only difficult part I see with doing both (as a beginner) is funding, the more you invest in your 401k and Roth IRA, the less you have for those down payments and ways of financing