Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Murray Stokely

Murray Stokely has started 2 posts and replied 5 times.

Post: Stop Predatory Investing Act to restrict deductions for investors with >50 rentals

Murray Stokely
Posted
  • Investor
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 2
Quote from @Bill B.:

Wow. That law will do a ton of good. They’ll be forced to start a second llc to buy the the next 50 properties. And then a 3rd llc for properties 101-150. At least they’re concentrating on the BIG problems now that they’ve solved homelessness, drug abuse, mental illness and the like.

After all these companies own almost 4% of the rentals. The are obviously the problem. This is a great precedent if they can apply it retroactively. Next they can go after all SFR landlords because they take homes away from owner occupants. And we all know renters shouldn't be allowed to rent houses. Stick them in big apartment buildings where they belong. That is the purpose of reducing the numbers of rental homes right? Get them out of our neighborhoods and back in those buildings.

I especially love the bill’s name. i wonder why it wasn’t called the “stop helping people rent houses instead of apartments bill”? Or get the renters out of our neighborhood bill?  Just like the inflation reduction act. Which spends billions and billions. Which every economist will tell you is the best way to fight inflation. 

it looks like it's worded to pierce through multiple LLCs like this and just talks about direct or indirect ownership:

"In the case of a disqualified single family property owner, no deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for any interest paid or accrued in connection with any single family residential rental property owned (directly or indirectly) by such disqualified single family property owner."

love your retitled short name for the bill :)

Post: Stop Predatory Investing Act to restrict deductions for investors with >50 rentals

Murray Stokely
Posted
  • Investor
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 2

FYI a bill was introduced on Tuesday that would restrict investors who purchase 50 or more single-family rentals from deducting interest or depreciation on those properties from their taxes.

https://thehill.com/business/4...


Likely of interest to some of the folks on this forum..

Post: Capital Gains Exceeds $500k - primary residence

Murray Stokely
Posted
  • Investor
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 2
Quote from @David A Lisowski:

Cash-out refi before selling so that your capital gain is under the $500k cap for joint filing.

That is not how it works at all.  Taking a cash-out refi does not increase your taxable basis and thus does not reduce your capital gain.

Post: BPCON 23 - Orlando, FL

Murray Stokely
Posted
  • Investor
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 2

Looks like tickets are for sale now on the Brightline trains from Miami to Orlando.  Has anyone ridden than can speak to the on-time % and general convenience?  Certainly sounds much better than flying commercial from Miami.

Post: QBI benefits for ~25 rental properties, most with paper losses

Murray Stokely
Posted
  • Investor
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Posts 5
  • Votes 2

The last two years the TurboTax online forms for bundling together Schedule E incomes into combined enterprises for QBI deductions were really buggy or outright missing, so I have a few questions to make sure I understand this better before going through that pain again.

Most of my rental properties have paper losses of $100-$10,000 this year, and I have W2 income well over the phase-outs for the $25,000 passive loss allowance.

1. If some of my ~25 Schedule E's show a small profit, but most show a loss, is there any benefit of going through QBI?  The aggregate is a loss, so does it matter?

2. How important is the aggregation into enterprises of my different schedule Es for this purpose?  I have handful of different LLCs, I could aggregate schedule Es and some shared expenses across a few different aggregate enterprises, but TurboTax online has made this pretty difficult in recent years.

3. Since I mostly have losses now, can I just enter them as separate properties for now but bundle them together into QBI enterprises in a future tax year when there is a positive income for the year and thus the benefit of the 20% deduction can be realized?

Any guidance would be appreciated.  Thanks!