Originally posted by @Lane Kawaoka:
@Scott Steffek I live in Hawaii where I don't deal with tenants or head aches. I don't have access to deals. I have to pay a premium.
@Daniel Mulberry with 10 turnkeys I have 1-2 evictions a year and 3-4 big events that happen. That's only for a lame 3000 a month. I need x3 that at least. Now you are talking 3-6 evictions a year and a big thing every month. Sounds like you created a JOB.
Thanks for the replies Lane Kawaoka!
That eviction rate seems high to me, but I actually had an ugly eviction situation in my very first time renting my primary residence, so maybe not.
My previous question was about scalability. With 10 TK units, I can see that you get a lower return per door. But is there any reason you'd have more eviction and big events with TK rather than another way? I'm working overseas now, so no matter how I source a property, I'm going to have to handle maintenance and management through a PM. So I'm wondering if there is any reason that TK is less scalable than self-sourcing (or asking my PM to source and handle rehab). Obviously there is a reduced margin for all the fees going to PM, less ability to find great deals with my own eyes, then with TK additional loss for the work of the TK provider. OTOH, as a relative novice, there is added security in knowing that so much of the initial work has already been handled.
So buying Turnkey will cost a few percentage at initial acquisition (I may be off on the magnitude of that). Following that, it looks like the same cost structure as managing a self-sourced property remotely through PM. For scaling, I would think that as time passes and more properties enter the portfolio, the impact of that initial marginal loss to the TK provider would actually dilute.
Does that sound right? I take your point on all that work for $3000 not being worth it. This is the main factor that has kept me out of REI up to now.