Originally posted by @Jiri B.:
@Mike Jones If you submit an offer, the listing agent is required to present the offer to the seller. However, if they are asking for proof of found, the seller will likely just reject your offer. But either way, the listing agent has to present your offer no matter what the offer is. They cannot "screen" the offers. All offers has to be submit to the seller.
Also note, if they are asking for it, and you really want the property, then do what they are asking to make your offer stand out. Usually not providing those items indicates that the buyer is not serious.
For auctions, you usually need to have proof of founds (cash or cashiers check) to register for the auction.
That's after the winning bid. Not before the bid. You can't provide proof of funds when the sum isn't determined yet.
Which is my point, it makes zero sense to not allow me to place an offer without proof of funds when you're going to put the property up for auction with zero proof of funds required to bid.
I really don't have a problem providing proof of funds, it's just the logistics.
1. My bank does not have a local branch in the state. Getting a written statement from them will take time, as well as depositing some cash I have on hand.
2. Showing them the amount of funds I have in my account may trigger a higher counter offer.
3. They might may not accept my offer regardless.
Seems like a backwards way of doing things and a major inconvenience for the buyer. In my opinion it has nothing to do with weeding out buyers who aren't serious, it's just a negotiation tactic. It makes much more sense to request such sensitive information after you have decided to move forward with an offer.
It's really sad, because I could give them a check or buy a certified funds money order and pay them right now. I have been saving up for place like this for years. It hurts to miss out on it because of something so trivial.