Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Michael Keller

Michael Keller has started 3 posts and replied 16 times.

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Andrew Johnson:

@Michael Keller So my caveats are: a.) I'm not a builder and b.) I'm not an investor in Texas.  So basically, this is more of theoretical thoughts that practical knowledge:

1.) I'd never invest in a town that could only sustain 5 new rentals.  It just doesn't make sense to me.  The population is too small, there's no reason to move there, there isn't any growth, etc.  So if the market can truly only sustain 5 new homes, I'd run away, that's just me.

2.) I'll guess that the reason it can't sustain 5 new units is that $950 might be the upper end or peak of the rental range.  If you could rent for $600 and compete with existing homes you wouldn't have the "sustainability" issue.  Your new product would basically create issues for anyone with older/inferior product.  So that would put you at the peak of a market that isn't growing.  It's not a place I'd want to be but your mileage may vary.

3.) One of the reasons that I don't build where I invest (despite cheap land) is that there are a lot of unforseen headaches. But if you talk to people it's not exactly an accident that there are 3 main builders within city limits. Go outside of the city limits and there are less restrictions, more builders, etc. It's a small micro-example but trying to get to know 10 towns, their desires, maybe odd permitting processes, etc. could be a bad ROI (by that I mean: time) for your friend.

4.) Because of those first three I'd be focusing on a market or submarket where you could build 50 homes and have that new product not be at the top of the market.  It's more local, easier to navigate permitting, easier for construction crews, etc.  

5.) What would be more interesting is for you to provide data on what it costs to just buy a plain ol' boring home in the market and what it would rent for.  What's the advantage of building?  Why not just rehab?  It would certainly take less time, might cost less money, ensure that you're in an area of the town where people want to live, etc.  

Your third point is something, I had not considered -- and it's a good one. I'll have to giver that some more thought. Thanks.

As to your second/fifth point, the advantage of building is that it would give us a product that is significantly better than the next best thing on the market at a cost that would be similar to buying old and rehabbing. Surprisingly, the older, dated properties in these towns are renting for at or near $ 1/sqft, or in this case -- $950. Therefore, we'd have the best product on the market for the same price as the older units.

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Aaron K.:

Small towns are small for a reason.  People do not live there.  Depending on the size of the town you could have difficulty finding tenants especially tenants who are willing and able to pay more to live in new construction housing than what is currently available.  

Also with prices that low and the renter percentage being so high I would worry about tenants having stable employment you would want someone with $3,000 per month in income (3x the rent).  A $100,000 loan at 5% over 30 years is only $550 per month which many people with your desired income for the rental should be able to afford.

Just something to think about.

Good points. Statistics and my experience with these towns suggests there is stability in employment. Although these towns are small, they are very near larger, more prosperous cities, where many small towners commute for work. That being said, there is certainly still some risk with finding tenants.

As to buying v. renting, the $550/month only takes into account P&I, and not T&I. Also, it does not take a down payment into account. I have several properties in the Dallas area that run about $750/month PITI that rent for $1,200 plus. Those tenants could theoretically afford to buy, but they don't.

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3

I originally posted this in the development and new construction forum, but didn't get the responses I was looking for. I thought this might be a better forum for the question. Thanks!

Recently, a friend and fellow real estate investor approached me with an opportunity. He wants to build 3 to 5 1,000 sqft homes in small towns that are within a 30 minute commute to a mid-size city in Texas. Through a local builder, who is a personal friend, we can purchase the land and construct the homes for approximately $65,000 each.

Based on my analysis, I believe that the new homes would appraise for at least $95,000 each. These towns predominantly consist of renters -- around 65%. Additionally, the availability of new, quality rentals in these towns is almost non-existent. Based on my analysis, I believe these homes would rent for at least $950/month.

Assuming a 75% LTV on a cash-out re-fi, we would be all in for $750 per property after closing costs. At a 5.25% APR on a 30 year note, we would cash flow $2,300-$2,900 per property in the first 5 years. The total ROI would be 472%-555% per property in the same period. Of course, we could also take 10 year or 15 year note and decrease cash flow in the short term for a higher return after 10 or 15 years.

The only limitations I see are the ability to scale and lack of appreciation. Each town could probably only sustain 3 to 5 homes. Additionally, the homes would likely never see any real appreciation. Nevertheless, if we built 50 homes in 5 years (5 homes in approximately 10 towns), we could have $145,000 in cash flow a year.

Does anyone see any glaring problems that I'm not considering? Why or how would this not work??

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Manolo D.:

Kevin Martin What payroll? What light? He lives on his truck and his 16 y.o son that will help him build does too.
Michael Keller All the concerns voiced out here is a lender concern, if you are hitting road blocks in the financial section, these might be the reasons why. I couldn’t even build a detached garage for $50/sf. Soft construction costs, utility taps, drawings (re-platting included), etc part of the 50k construction cost, is unheard of. We get it that you are trying to verify the scenario only, but shouldn’t you cover all scenarios before you verify a transaction and cover all the behinds and pitfalls? Let’s say you’re mid building, builder finds out he’s going to lose and bails out, what is your backup? What’s the next builder bid?

I'm not sure I fully understand your response. A lender would not be involved until the house is built and we cash out re-fi. We have cash on hand to build a few of these at a time. Again, I understand that $65/sqft is inexpensive, but I'd be willing to wager construction costs are significantly less expensive in rural Texas as compared to LA. I do, however, appreciate your question about the builder backing out. That's the type of thoughts that I'm looking for -- potential problems with the proposed project. That would certainly be a risk associated with the project. That being said, as long as we were able to secure a builder to finish the job at 95/sqft, we would theoretically break even.

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Kevin Martin:

.@Michael Kellerinteresting post here as we are doing something similar but different. I have a few questions..

1. Do you know this builder and how did he come to the price of 65k

2. Is the 65k and “all in” price to build or just vertical construction? Are they 2/1 or 3/2?

3. How is the contractor making his money in this deal? Does the 65k include is overhead and profit?

4. Did you say replatt? This might completely kill the deal if the zoning doesn’t allow or the city makes you do crazy things. Do the lots have Utilites or do you have to bring them in? Road frontage/access? Ect, etc

There are many many things to look at when you get into deals like this; you are basically becoming the developer. Or you are just the “money guy” and have to trust the builder and his knowledge and capabilities 100%. 

The builder is probably thinking he can build it at $50/sqft his cost of labor and material times 5 houses which comes out to 75k. At the best best best case after he counts all his trips to Home Depot and all the unknowns in construction he will come out to $60/sqft and probably closer to $65/ sqft. He will make 25k at best before overhead for 8mnths of work and think he actually made money because he was able to make payroll and keep the lights on.

1. He came to the price of 65k after having built this same house multiple times.

2. 65k is all in price.

3. I have no idea how the contractor allocates his overhead and profit. I do know that 65k is everything we owe him to deliver the finished product.

4. There are utilities and road access in place to the first potential set of properties.

Post: Cozy

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3

I use it for both screening and payments. It works great for both. It does take a few days for payments to process, but that's true of any online payment method.

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Mike Wood:

@Michael Keller I agree with others, that $65/ft2 is way, way low.  If that price is possible, i doubt the rents would that high, as the finish must be so low that it will turn off most renters other than Section 8 renters.

I agree the price does seem low. However, I'm trying to determine why the deal wouldn't make sense assuming the price is accurate. That being said, I have very good reason to believe the price is accurate as I know the builder and have seen the finished product. The finish out, while not high quality, would be superior to just about everything available in these markets.

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Don Gouge:

Unless you have some secret source for cheap materials and free labor I don't see how you can do this for 65k. What is the cost of the lots? Free?

The land is very inexpensive. $4,000 would buy enough land for 3 houses. We would have to have it re-platted, which would add some expense.

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3

@Matt K. Valid point. The builder is not a fly-by-night contractor, but there is absolutely some degree of risk in relying on only his price point. Thanks!

Post: HELP! Tell me why this won't work...

Michael KellerPosted
  • Investor
  • Richardson, TX
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 3

@Jay Hinrichs

We would be doing the deals all cash.

I've accounted for taxes post-construction. During construction they would relatively insignificant as you mentioned.

I agree on the lender pre-approval.

Thanks for your input!