Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Melody T.

Melody T. has started 5 posts and replied 29 times.

Post: First investment in multifam via syndicator

Melody T.Posted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 32
  • Votes 12
Quote from @Paul Azad:
Quote from @Ryan Arth:

A value add play that shows yields and IRR comparable with the long term S&P average...

 She is getting a 1.46 multiple over 4 years , so 1.46 X to the Y 0.25 equals 10% compounded annual return, which should be totally covered by depreciation so that's an effective yield of 16% if in top bracket. Which she then may have opportunity to 1031 to avoid the 20% cap gain and 25% depreciation recapture, So overall its a pretty good investment if it pans out?  The SP500 has returned "long term" 8.4% nominal and 6.9% real, per Dr Jeremy Seigels 1801-2023 data set and would be fully taxable at sale.  As she personally knows the syndicator she may be able to garner far more info in conversations with them about this and other investments, which can give her an informational asymmetrical advantage over 99% of retail investors as well. 

Thanks, Paul. Appreciate the commentary 

Post: First investment in multifam via syndicator

Melody T.Posted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 32
  • Votes 12

Things have been slow trying to build my real estate portfolio through single family and small multi fam. I'm looking at a lot of opportunities, but after I run the numbers, I'm not really finding decent CoC returns and cap rates, especially looking in the Cleveland area right now. My offers are getting beat by folks who have some magically optimistic pro form apparently and it's not worth jumping in for sub par returns and tenant headaches (or PM headaches). As such, I'm thinking about trying to scale via syndication.


I know a principal at a syndication with over $2B in assets. They're very well established so I feel pretty comfortable with the sponsor and their track record. The property I'm considering investing in is a multifamily facility, ~600 units with 95% occupancy, and the play is to increase value by renovating the units and holding for 4-5 years. They've made $3M of equity available. The investor Cash on Cash yield is projected to be 5.9% in Yr 1, 7.1% Yr 2, 8.06% Yr 3, and 9.89% Yr 4. This includes distributions and in year 4, distributions + sale proceeds. Annual average yield 7.67%. IRR 10.78% and equity multiple 1.46x

I would like to learn more about what due diligence I should be doing, what questions to ask, and anything I would need in place to transact (attorney, costs associated etc.) Thanks in advance.

Post: Lead paint inspections Cleveland

Melody T.Posted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 32
  • Votes 12
Quote from @Brian Garlington:

Jemma.............I have a lead specialist directly from the Cleveland City Website that has passed several of my units. Many of them work for PMs, but I found that if you reach out directly to them they will do it a little more reasonably then oing through the PM because they often hire the same folks, but then put their markup in as well.


Hi Brian, would you mind sending me that person's info?

Post: ISO General Contractor in Cleveland

Melody T.Posted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 32
  • Votes 12

Anyone have a good GC in the Cleveland area you would recommend? Thanks in advance

Post: Flips - to use a GC or not to use a GC??

Melody T.Posted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 32
  • Votes 12
Quote from @Domenic Passarella:

Hey, I know it’s not really answering your question directly, but I’ll give you my take.  I’m also in the middle of my first fix and flip in Cleveland (remotely, I live in Rhode Island).  Since it is remote, it is the first time I’ve ever used a GC. Before this, I’ve done six fix and rents in Providence acting as my own GC.

I can’t imagine doing my project without a GC, unless I was paying a handyman or a real estate agent every time to go meet a vendor there.   I have also really really lucked out with this GC, he started on the project a day or two after the close, and has been working on it since. Having no contacts in the area, I relied on my agent, who is investor friendly, he gave me a couple of contacts that he trusted.  I called all of them, only one of them picked up when I called, which is very important to me.  His price was reasonable, and he said he had the capacity to do it, and he came recommended, which was all I really needed to pull the trigger.

Long story short, after this experience, I would probably only do it with a general contractor, but I think the key is finding the right general contractor.  If you have a good agent, they should be able to help you with that.  

Journey Toole from Keller Williams is my agent and Darryl from World Builders And Contractors is my contractor.


Good luck


How did you flip work with Darryl?

Post: General contractor not performing

Melody T.Posted
  • Investor
  • California
  • Posts 32
  • Votes 12

@John Chan how did things work out for you? I just talked to this guy to potentially use for one of my rehabs. 

Quote from @Samuel Diouf:
Quote from @Melody T.:
Quote from @Katie Balatbat:

@Melody T.

California is generally more cumbersome than other states when it comes to taxes and filings. Even if you create a non-CA LLC, if you are managing the business from California, you will likely be deemed to be "doing business" in California and therefore likely subject to CA taxes. California charges a minimum tax of $800 a year per LLC, and more if you have gross receipts in excess of $250k. So, if you create an LLC in another state, you will likely need to register it as a foreign LLC in California. Though, this process will be the same for the other state (if you created a CA LLC you may need to register it as a foreign LLC in the state in which you are doing business/holding property). This means that you will probably need to pay registration and filing fees in at least 2 states if you don't buy CA property as a CA resident.

Be sure to tell your accountant that you may now need to file non-resident income tax returns in each state where you own property as well. CA taxes residents on worldwide income but may provide a credit for taxes paid to other states.

Most likely the state where the property is located is where lawsuits would be brought if they are something for personal injury like a trip and fall or something of that nature because the “cause of action” arose in that state. So even if you pick a state with stronger protections like WY or NV, the cause of action arose in the state where the tenant fell, so likely that the court where the accident happened would have jurisdiction. Of course, with all things, the answers to all these matters will depend on the circumstances.

California tends to have more laws on the books and requirements and restrictions that it can be a good idea to form a CA LLC for out of state property so that you as a CA resident are covered, and to try to have your contracts fall under the purview of CA courts. It also is helpful to have a California LLC in case you ever sell that property and move into another state so that you do not need to form a new LLC altogether with new operating agreement, just re-register in the new state as a new foreign LLC. Also, the state of formation is likely where internal disputes would be brought among LLC members, so if you and a partner and/or spouse live in CA, you probably want to arbitrate in CA if the two of you had a disagreement. But, that is not always the right answer and you should speak with someone familiar with your personal situation to get advice specific to you.

*This post is informational only and is not to be relied upon. Readers are advised to seek professional advice. This post does not create an attorney-client or CPA-client relationship.


One more question, is it possible (and lawful) to apply for the mortgage conventionally (under my name as an individual) for a more favorable rate, and then assign the asset to the LLC at a later date?

This is what a lot of people do. The one risk is that most mortgages will have an acceleration clause stating that if you transfer the deed your entire mortgage can be due.

Hi Samuel, what do you mean by "this is what most people do?" Katie had several different options in her response that was quoted in your reply. Thanks!
Quote from @Katie Balatbat:

@Melody T.

California is generally more cumbersome than other states when it comes to taxes and filings. Even if you create a non-CA LLC, if you are managing the business from California, you will likely be deemed to be "doing business" in California and therefore likely subject to CA taxes. California charges a minimum tax of $800 a year per LLC, and more if you have gross receipts in excess of $250k. So, if you create an LLC in another state, you will likely need to register it as a foreign LLC in California. Though, this process will be the same for the other state (if you created a CA LLC you may need to register it as a foreign LLC in the state in which you are doing business/holding property). This means that you will probably need to pay registration and filing fees in at least 2 states if you don't buy CA property as a CA resident.

Be sure to tell your accountant that you may now need to file non-resident income tax returns in each state where you own property as well. CA taxes residents on worldwide income but may provide a credit for taxes paid to other states.

Most likely the state where the property is located is where lawsuits would be brought if they are something for personal injury like a trip and fall or something of that nature because the “cause of action” arose in that state. So even if you pick a state with stronger protections like WY or NV, the cause of action arose in the state where the tenant fell, so likely that the court where the accident happened would have jurisdiction. Of course, with all things, the answers to all these matters will depend on the circumstances.

California tends to have more laws on the books and requirements and restrictions that it can be a good idea to form a CA LLC for out of state property so that you as a CA resident are covered, and to try to have your contracts fall under the purview of CA courts. It also is helpful to have a California LLC in case you ever sell that property and move into another state so that you do not need to form a new LLC altogether with new operating agreement, just re-register in the new state as a new foreign LLC. Also, the state of formation is likely where internal disputes would be brought among LLC members, so if you and a partner and/or spouse live in CA, you probably want to arbitrate in CA if the two of you had a disagreement. But, that is not always the right answer and you should speak with someone familiar with your personal situation to get advice specific to you.

*This post is informational only and is not to be relied upon. Readers are advised to seek professional advice. This post does not create an attorney-client or CPA-client relationship.


One more question, is it possible (and lawful) to apply for the mortgage conventionally (under my name as an individual) for a more favorable rate, and then assign the asset to the LLC at a later date?

Quote from @Katie Balatbat:

@Melody T.

California is generally more cumbersome than other states when it comes to taxes and filings. Even if you create a non-CA LLC, if you are managing the business from California, you will likely be deemed to be "doing business" in California and therefore likely subject to CA taxes. California charges a minimum tax of $800 a year per LLC, and more if you have gross receipts in excess of $250k. So, if you create an LLC in another state, you will likely need to register it as a foreign LLC in California. Though, this process will be the same for the other state (if you created a CA LLC you may need to register it as a foreign LLC in the state in which you are doing business/holding property). This means that you will probably need to pay registration and filing fees in at least 2 states if you don't buy CA property as a CA resident.

Be sure to tell your accountant that you may now need to file non-resident income tax returns in each state where you own property as well. CA taxes residents on worldwide income but may provide a credit for taxes paid to other states.

Most likely the state where the property is located is where lawsuits would be brought if they are something for personal injury like a trip and fall or something of that nature because the “cause of action” arose in that state. So even if you pick a state with stronger protections like WY or NV, the cause of action arose in the state where the tenant fell, so likely that the court where the accident happened would have jurisdiction. Of course, with all things, the answers to all these matters will depend on the circumstances.

California tends to have more laws on the books and requirements and restrictions that it can be a good idea to form a CA LLC for out of state property so that you as a CA resident are covered, and to try to have your contracts fall under the purview of CA courts. It also is helpful to have a California LLC in case you ever sell that property and move into another state so that you do not need to form a new LLC altogether with new operating agreement, just re-register in the new state as a new foreign LLC. Also, the state of formation is likely where internal disputes would be brought among LLC members, so if you and a partner and/or spouse live in CA, you probably want to arbitrate in CA if the two of you had a disagreement. But, that is not always the right answer and you should speak with someone familiar with your personal situation to get advice specific to you.

*This post is informational only and is not to be relied upon. Readers are advised to seek professional advice. This post does not create an attorney-client or CPA-client relationship.


Thanks so much for your comprehensive reply, Katie. I'm confused on one facet of your reply. You mentioned there would benefit to form the entity in CA so that my contracts fall under the purview of CA courts, but also mention that if there is a cause of action in OH, where the property is, it would fall in OH state purview, which is also my understanding. Since it doesn't appear I'm going to avoid the franchise tax in CA, would it be preferential to create the LLC in CA and register it as a foreign entity in OH, so that I can meet both of these benefits you reference, or is the reverse preferred (form in OH and register as foreign entity in CA)? I'm not entirely following the implications and fundamental differences of the two options.

Thanks again!

Quote from @Samuel Diouf:

One thing to take into consideration is.. if you buy the property with an LLC your interest rates will be higher.


Yeah, I'm aware of that and it's not ideal. Trying to figure out if I can buy as individual and then transfer the asset to an LLC afterwards.