Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Melissa Leo

Melissa Leo has started 1 posts and replied 4 times.

Post: Do I need to own a business?

Melissa LeoPosted
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 1

I believe you can just take out a loan and own your units independently. HOWEVER, if something happens and a tenant or previous tenant tries to sue you, if you don't have the properties in individual LLC's, then they can take all of your properties, even personal. This is what my mother, another REI, told me and my husband if we planned to expand out from 1 owned house. I am not sure about RE laws where you live, but it's good to look them up and learn more.

@sara 

@Sara Bradfordundefined Thank you so much for your input! We will definitely keep that in mind if we decide to continue following through with this property :)

Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Melissa Leo He is allowed to list his own property he just cannot be a dual agent and represent both himself AND you in the transaction since he is the owner of the property but he is allowed to represent just himself. nothing shady about i,t he actually told you so that you would have fair representation so he did his job right and legally.

 I think I see... so it would be he would work through the agent we get so instead of seller-agent-agent-buyer it would be seller-agent-buyer and it would be 100% okay? (Apologies for my greenness showing, I've only ever gone from living with my parents to renting from landlords, I've never even thought about buying a home/multi-family to fix up then rent out myself til a couple months ago)

So my husband and I are brand new, I mean we only started looking at the possibility of buying and renting out properties seriously in the last 2 months. We found a very small house (2 bed 1 bath) house for $47,000. We drove by the house to see it in person first and found several sort of big things wrong: the gravel driveway was more grass than gravel, the back yard was about 20 feet from door right up to railroad tracks, and (BIGGIE) my hubby went around the back and saw char on the back of the house, seemingly from a fairly recent fire (which wasn't disclosed on realtor (dot) com of course). We figured that we could talk down the price for a lot less than they put it up for, since it's only been on the market for 1 day only. I called up the real estate agent listed and it turns out it is the agent's personal property he's put up for sale. He said that since Illinois has a law where you can't broker your own property, we had to find ourselves an agent and he would work through them. 

Firstly, I'm not understanding because isn't he still technically brokering it himself? Secondly, is this a huge red flag? My husband thinks it is and we should just back away from this property. The guy is licensed, it's just his property. But the fact he didn't already have another agent list the property is a little sketchy. I'm too green to know if we should back away. It'd be a really good place, minus the train tracks, but if we put up a fenced deck in the back it'd be easier to rent it out if we do go for it, as it'd be safer for animals and small children. Any advice would be appreciated!